Did the "Hindi speaking" people of north India ever do anything significant in history?
Once you omit: The Indus valley region of Pakistan, Punjab region and Kashmir Buddhist ideology from Nepal Dravidian/Hindu culture of South India Muslim contributions of the Persianised/Turkic Mughals.
I cannot think of a single thing other than Ganges river that is significant in north India.
Is this the single most cucked group in all of Asia?
Ayden Carter
>They don't speak Armenian in Nagorno-Karabakh Trash map.
Jackson Reyes
They don't speak Ossetian in Ossetia
Henry Mitchell
triggered are we?
Jacob Bell
Almost all of Indian civilization developed and happened in the Hindi region. If anything, it's the Indian core. However it went into steep decline in medieval times and it's rich culture only survives in neighboring regions
Jayden Sanders
>it's rich culture only survives in neighboring regions
The classic wewuzz argument. Do you have any evidence whatsoever to support this horseshit?
Where are the monuments, great cities, civilisations, cultures, ideologies that originated from this region? As far as historical records are concerned, the neighboring regions are responsible for all of it.
Blake Mitchell
I mean... what's the point if it's not accurate?
Asher Evans
It is pretty fucking accurate as far as the topic is concerned.
Oliver Butler
>Buddha >Ashoka >Mahabharata Pretty much everything happened there
Andrew Hernandez
t. Davit Armeni Kevoladorian
Justin Barnes
>Buddha Nope.
>Ashoka Lasted 30 years. Shunned native cultures and converted to Buddhism. wow.
>Mahabharata Literally who tier. Pajeet babble with not a single shred of physical evidence.
Austin Howard
>Buddha wasn't from North India
Yeah you have retardation
Anthony Stewart
>Yeah you have retardation
Buddha was from Nepal you fucking retard.
Jonathan Sullivan
>500B.C. >Nepal
I'm sorry to tell you you have a mental disability
Brody Butler
>Nepali people weren't invented yet
So a date is an argument to wewuzz another region that has nothing to do with your people.
This is why you are a fucking meme Pajeet
Alexander Miller
According to your logic, every Byzantine emperor was born in Turkey
Wyatt Roberts
>>it's rich culture only survives in neighboring regions >Nepal didn't exist, so Buddha was a Pajeet. >> Modern names did not exist, so naturally everyone is a Pajeet
It's amazing how your mind works.
Justin Flores
buddha was not an ethnic pajeet, he was probably similar to uygurs of today
Adam Miller
On the same topic, what did punjabis ever do in history besides getting conquered by virtually anybody who crossed the indus river?
Jacob Hall
They fought Alexander the great and he acknowledged their greatness, they were important in ancient mathematics and spawned Sikhism.
Jonathan Flores
Birthplace of IVC Birthplace of Vedic culture Fought and recognised by Alexander Fought off Mongols Actually retained their culture and language regardless of Islamic, Hindu or Sikh religions
Try again Pageet
Andrew Reyes
>Birthplace of IVC geographically sure, but can we say that the people are 100% the same as the people who inhabited the IVC? I would say that punjabis and hindkowans are the people MOST related to the ivc dwellers, and that pajeets below punjab aren't related to ivc to the same extent. >Birthplace of Vedic culture debatable >Fought and recognised by Alexander sure >Fought off Mongols debatable >Actually retained their culture and language regardless of Islamic, Hindu or Sikh religions partially true, if muslims had wanted it, the indian subcontinent would be muslim, usually they did not want converts because taxing non believers was a better alternative, iranics and turkics also viewed themselves as racially superior to subcontinental muslims and did not even pray in the same mosques as them so there's that too
Jose Wilson
Punjab and Sindh was largely the birthplace of IVC. A lot of people have settled from all over Asia, but most tribes who claim to be native are in fact native. Though a lot of central asian and afghan migration since forever.
The region of Ravi river was the birthplace of Vedic culture according to plenty of sources.
Levi Richardson
>The region of Ravi river was the birthplace of Vedic culture according to plenty of sources. it is, but can you say punjabis living there now are the same as the people who brought the subcontinent sanskrit and hinduism?
Lincoln Lee
>did not even pray in the same mosques as them so there's that too Source? That's oddly specific
Justin Wright
Dude, the people who live there now are by definition going to be more related than any other group. If you are suggesting any mass migration, the burden of proof is on yourself.
John Miller
>sanskrit Fairly certain that linguistic evidence points to a Central Asian origin.
Lucas Murphy
eh too lazy to produce the sources, but the tl;dr of it was that the khiljis, babur and some of the afghan/iranic invaders did not like indians too much, saw them as feeble and weak and wanted to exploit their work for money/wealth rather than converting them. They had their own mosques. Babur himself said the subcontinent is a terrible place, filled with horrible people, the only redeeming factor was it's got lots of resources.
What I'm trying to point at is why try and identify with your invaders, who so clearly historically despised you, rather than with your fellow pajeet who looks no different to you and shares the same culture and languages.
Anthony Harris
>looks no different to you and shares the same culture and languages.
The Indian subcontinent has more cultures and languages than any other region of Asia. It's the last place you can say shares anything.
Ryan Cooper
>pajeets aside from the chink ones in the north east look the fucking same >indian groups in pakistan look no different from the average pajeet either K