One of greatest Germans ever

>one of greatest Germans ever
>openly admitted the superiority of French language and culture

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Roman_Empire
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>one of the great Germans ever
>homosexual

Didn't he say, when he entered Paris with his army, that if Napoleon was still alive, they'd never have won like they did?

>Germans
He wanst german. Germany didnt exist in that time.

Brainlet.

>Alexander
>Ceasar
>Fridrich
Homosexuality breeds greatness desu

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Roman_Empire

>made essay denouncing Machiavelli
>became the most Machiavellian kings of his time

Something about fucking men makes you extra manly.

>>one of greatest Germans ever
>austrian

That's the Roman Empire not Germany

>Kingdom of Germany (part of the empire since 962)

...

Ceaser was a bottom and he literally fucked his way to top office

Talk about a power bottom.

To be fair, at the time and up until the revolution, France was run by crypto-Germans, the main reason France back then was so great.

What do you see here, retard? is king of Germany? Emperor of Germany? or it is King of Prussia?

he wasn't german

Prussians are Germans....

bait?

I think he's confusing Old Fritz with Bismarck

dunno why

No.............

bavarians are germans.....

It's the other way around I think, Napoleon visited the grave of Old Fritz in 1806 and said something like "Gentlemen we shall not be here today if this man was still alive"

>Nappy looked up to Fritz when he was raping Prussia
>Prussia looked up to Nappy when raping France

pottery

>this is what krautboos believe

German race not German nationality.

Tell me France wasn't ruled by crypto-germans since the Merovingians.

Probs cause Machiavelli revealed the cheat codes to life as a prince. Wouldn't you be mad?

Was he an assassin or a Templar?

The vast majority of shit Machiavelli said was extremely obvious and self-explanatory:
>prepare for war in peace time
>don't trust anybody
>don't take men's wives or property
>be brutal rarely and in small doses to set an example
>if you can't be loved and feared, just be feared

I mean I'm not saying the guy was an idiot (he was very intelligent), but The Prince isn't some amazing philosophical work of human discovery. It's similar to Sun Tzu's Art of War in that while everything they say is pretty much true and good advice, none of it is particularly shocking or new.

>none of it is particularly shocking or new.
>yet almost nobody follows it.

I have to agree with here. I think you can only say that because of who you are and the age you live in. Barely anyone follows those rules in our societies today.

Maybe because the lessons directed specifically towards the prince of a late 15th century Italian city-state isn’t particularly relevant to people living in the 21st century?

>don't trust anybody
>don't take men's wives or property
>be brutal rarely and in small doses to set an example
>if you can't be loved and feared, just be feared
The beauty about the book is that you can apply the principles to everyday life as you have laid out. But thabks for saying yourself that these are self evident in today's society.

>had wives and children
>homosexual

>homosexuals can't marry/have children.
Also
>Applying modern sexuality perspectives to old times
kys

>homosexuals can't marry/have children
so then we can agree that homosexuality is a choice

also i was wrong about Frederick, he didnt have children apparently he really was a homo

typical germ shit that hated Poles
now Prussia is dead and I dance over its grave

Deciding to marry and have children was/is a choice (to continue your family name/dinasty).

And i must repeat:
>Applying modern sexuality perspectives to old times

his dad was better and he knew how shit the fr*nch were

true

he should've at least went the Hadrian route and adopted

That's just a good ol' German tradition. Nietzsche insisted on being considered Polish.

>German Larps as a Frenchman
>Italian Larps as a Frenchman
>Austrian Larps as a German

Is autism a disease of great leaders?

Wasn't pretending to not be machiavellian the most machiavellian thing to do?

The real thing about it though is how to manipulate and use other peoples emotions, wants, and desires to your advantage.

Its essentially How to Win Friends and Influence people but without the facade of being friendly.

And yes its not like these things are revolutionary, its just laid out for people to read and study the art of being manipulative.