>WITHIN EACH HERO THERE IS POTENTIAL TO IMPLODE IN BLAZING FURY, BECOMING A SCINTILLATING STAR, THROUGH CRITICAL TRAUMATIC STRESS; AS A LAST RESORT, THIS MECHANISM OF SELFSACRIFICIAL DESTRUCTION CAN BE ACTUATED IN A MOMENT OF CRISIS —THIS IS TACTICAL SELFIMMOLATION.
Is this meant literally, or figuratively? What did he mean by this?
Even Veeky Forums pseuds are less pathetic than the ammount of ideology wordplay this little guy spouts.
Cringe.
Ian Mitchell
Whoah...
Jason Butler
...
Jacob Lewis
What's wrong with this aphorism? If he knows nothing then this should all be bullshit, so explain how it is. Or is there too much ideology wordplay for you to understand it? I'll give you a pic and audio in case you can't read. vocaroo.com/i/s05sd075uz9Y
Carter Bennett
Lmao, the audio...
Nathan Nelson
Then, show me what's the structure of this kid's philosophy.
David Harris
? You haven’t addressed any of that user’s questions. Either explain how Mundus Millennialis is shit, or shut up.
Jack Jones
If it's not ideology wordplay. Explain the kid's philosophy structure.
Tyler Gutierrez
Three principles in man, body, mind, and soul. Gnosticism with a bit of Hegel and Nietzsche. The hero integrates and overcomes, the rest don't.
Angel Rodriguez
>gnosticism Explain his "gnosticism" idea structure. >nietzsche Explain this.
Tyler Bell
You’re wrong, and you’re playing into this idiot’s game. The burden proof is on him, claiming that MM is “ideology wordplay”.
Brayden Garcia
Man emerges out of unreflective immersion in his environment into integral knowledge of himself and the world. The inferior element in him exerts a gravity on his faculties that he must overcome. The in-itself is reconciled with the for-itself.
>Nietzsche
The emphasis on self and self-overcoming
Brayden Perry
>it's obscurantist so anything I think it is it is Oh jeez
Justin Myers
>poor guy is suffering from severe schizophrenia and psychosis >insecure try-hard brainlets on this site actually take his ramblings seriously Jesus Christ, this board has hit rock bottom.
Ryan Hall
>I can't read fucking words and understand them
brainlet
Landon Long
>I don't understand it so it must be mental illness
brainlet central itt
David Bell
Seek help, m8.
Josiah Hill
Hahaha What about a "kosmic struggle" is enlightening to you? It's a fancy way of saying what every philosopher (and average person) knows or infers about the world, only everyone else tries to make it digestible because they aren't trying to market virally on Veeky Forums It's not WRONG it's just not saying anything profound at all
Colton Mitchell
things are as profound as you are. sorry not everything caters to your brainlet sensibilities
Charles Phillips
>I'll call him a brainlet again, that'll teach him You know what, keep reading this drivel, it suits you
Sebastian Morgan
another pseud who confuses incomprehension for intelligence. fuck off
Connor Morales
Rei, I see a lot of viral marketers on this site and you are hands down the worst one with the lamest crap to sell I'm sorry you are so insecure about being autistic but that's life kid, you aren't special in your misery Wendy's is always hiring bud
Ryder Rodriguez
literally delusional
Thomas Ortiz
>burden of proof 1. Spamming one guy's persona is banned 2. Not being banned is a consequence of OP's implication of the ideology wordplay having relevance 3. If it's relevant. Explain to me his philosophy structure.
>Man emerges out of unreflective immersion in his environment into integral knowledge of himself and the world. Man knows.* Wordplay. >faculties Explain this. >inferior So it plagiarizes everything from past gnostic philosophy structures, or he makes something new? >autism verses It's fucking stupid. You can find easily concepts this kid uses deliberately and he doesn't even define them before.
Jesus Christ, even pseuds on Veeky Forums are less pathetic than this guy.
Are you mexican hahaha
Angel Murphy
>am I reading into nonsense psychobabble? >no no. It's everyone in the thread who is wrong You see how funny this is for me right?
Kevin Gutierrez
it's so fucking funny to me you can't read words in your mother tongue and comprehend them. unbelievable. in-itself, for-itself, and the in-and-for-itself is straight out of Hegel. am I reading too much into it or am I not a fucking pleb like you?
Jack Russell
Ooooooh, what an argument!!! Whether you're rei or a deluded sycophant your lack of suitable defense of the source material implies that you don't understand it
Ayden Peterson
It baffles me that you accept that he is ripping things from Hegel yet my critique of him saying nothing new sounded wrong to you Are you just stupid or is this a joke?
Levi Wilson
this is stupid. There is no self apart from the other. Family is the comprehension of self and other, reconcilitation of it through the fact that there is something bounding you to the other, and, therefore, something you have to deal with, something undodgeable. To see the collective as an institutionalized slavery is pure childish philosophy, because you cannot fully comprehend and create what is your "self" without a frame of reference, some kind of otherness, and without realizing there is always a self in the other, a sort of identity, just like looking at the mirror. Of course that the blind exercise of authority over the child limps their growth, but legitimate authority, well exercised authority, gives them a mirror and a goal, an aspiration and, at the same time, "an enemy". If you can't realize this, it's time to get away from your juvenile dreams of unbound "freedom" and "individuality", which not only do not exist, but are actually harmful both to your actual freedom and individuality.
Dylan Martinez
>being influenced by a philosopher means ripping him off
So Nietzsche ripped of Schopenhauer I take it? Hegel Kant? Autism
Carson Martin
an argument wasn't even made to shoot down. you don't get to use buzzwords, call them axiomatic, and charge me with refuting them. are you retarded?
Nathaniel Walker
>influenced See
Colton Howard
the family is the collectivity that enslaves, he doesn't reject the other as such
Alexander Sanders
No You can describe any of their theorems without falling back on "you know, like that other guy who said this thing" You clearly can't do the same with this idiot so I don't see what we're even disagreeing on
Hunter Peterson
That's not nasus romanus. He has mestizo-eagle nose.
HE HAS NATIVE BLOOD. AKA. HE IS A MONGREL.
Zachary Davis
>he responds Rei stop they're picking on you
John Campbell
He has low Iq what do you expect from this mexican
Camden Gray
...
Dominic Harris
in-itself: unconsciousness of the self, the body in its becoming. corresponds to the past
for-itself: rational ego, rational self-directed agent of the body. corresponds to the present
in-and-for-itself: self-realization. integrality. reconciliation of self with its otherness. corresponds to the future
all three in harmony produce wisdom, Sofia, the centralization and consolidation of the self as a power over its parts.
David Jenkins
He really is astoundingly dense; every thread starts as a request for input And ends as a declaration that "everyone is stupid but me!" I guess he really is autistic
Cooper Johnson
Holy shit, dude, calm down and listen to me I understand it. It's not anything special. Would you like to go back to square one where you tell me I DONT understand it or can you find that post yourself?
Adam Lee
that tends to happen when people meme and don't have anything to say at all
Jonathan Taylor
m8 I really don't think you do. explain in your own words
Bentley Harris
>what is id ego and superego >what is a man riding a horse, if you like the romans Kid, grow up, this is the oldest perception of the psyche: uncontrollable past/subconscious, the society you reckon with and the internal mechanisms you have for reckoning with it
It's boring. It was boring when Freud re oackaged it and time has only made it more boring Not more wrong, just borig
Brayden Peterson
YOUAREIGNORANT
Jack Nelson
freud has no concept corresponding to the fourth reconciliatory principle
he interprets the state of Sofia on an ontologically higher level than the mere eudaimonistic mastery of the passions in Greece/rome
there are subtle differences between all of these philosophies. hence why it's philosophy
you're a pleb
Jaxon Cruz
YOUAREALSOIGNORANT
Caleb Taylor
This kid is a great example of tequila overdose.
>roman nose Actually has an amerindian nose. >aphorism Actually isn't concise and uses acontextual babble. >gnosticism More like "seer" tarot wordplay. >"it h-has N-Nietzsche influence, o-ok?" More like Anthony Robbins influence lol
Adam King
Eh fuck you too buddy
Wyatt Nguyen
>you're a pleb because you didn't notice he subtle differences in my favorite neckbeards theorem Again, grow up
>getting calling out on my shit means you're the one who needs to grow up
delusional
Hudson Nguyen
>aryan All of them had african skulls. Cro-magnon and neolithic farmer admixtured people are the chosen ones. lol you really are that polish kid spamming shit about "indo-germanic" garbage.
Alexander Morgan
YOUAREANIGNORANTTURANIAN
Logan James
No. posting obscurantist plagiarizism, having everyone point out to you that that's what it is and wiping that away because of differences you admit are subtle and then thinking others are plebs/delusional is why you should grow up Also marketing your blog on Veeky Forums is always a sure sign of retardation (inb4 I'm not home- I mean, him)
Samuel Brown
His shit doesn't make sense, everyone knows this
Ethan Green
YOUTWOAREBOTHIGNORANTANDALSOPROBABLYTURANIAN
Cameron Hill
Are you aware that not using space between words actually makes your entire post violate any linguistic layer rules?
Also, I doubt you are actually "german", and that's pathetic enough.
You are probably mexican lol
The way you express yourself in every post shows us the brainlet you are, ray. I'm really really sorry that you are not able to grasp intuitive matters from reality, but that's how life is. Sometimes, there are better people than you, and sometimes the things you talk are all bullshit. ;)
Ryder Wright
he's the first intellectual giant to be produced by Veeky Forums. one can only hope that we produce more luminaries
Connor Miller
>rei is a /hi/ luminary I agree with that but not as a god thing
David Sanders
>REMEMBER WHEN ONE WAS NOT AFRAID OF GOING OUTSIDE? REMEMBER WHEN ONE FELT FREE IN THE WORLD —NOT BESET BY DANGER, NOT AN ALIEN AMONG STRANGERS— AND THERE WAS EVERYWHERE TO GO —NOT JUST INSIDE ONESELF? REMEMBER WHEN ONE WAS PURE? "Pure" here means ignorant. You are only not afraid of going outside when you're young because you are ignorant. If you're afraid of going outside when you're older, it means you're now a coward.
I wonder, does anyone else notice the Christian sentiment in his philosophy yet?
>The Nazarene was indeed free of ressentiment — or at any rate as free of it as any man can be. But not because he was too great a man, but an extremely small one. Which is more or less what Dostoevsky had in mind when he called him an idiot.
>In Paradise there will be no thinking because thinking is an activity that presupposes flux, and flux presupposes conflict. But lack of conflict is Paradise's essential feature! therefore lack of flux, therefore lack of thinking. Therefore thinking beings will not be possible there. Which is why it was such a stroke of genius on the part of him who said that only the "poor in spirit" will inherit Paradise. Indeed!
Zachary Thomas
It's basically the gnostic world view that the material being is to be shunned in favourite of higher truth and transcending this imperfect world.
I think he may be creating spiritual justification for neetdom which is top kek in my book.
Dylan Rogers
>browse Veeky Forums a year ago and still do from time to time but rarely >this drivel is posted in a thread that gets 3 replies and dies >come back today >see this
What went wrong? No one was taking this shit seriously .
Angel Cook
I decided to help him by insulting his work and provoking him to chimp out and leave.
His pathetic blog is literally below pseud tier, so he wouldn't get any replies even samefagging as he always does. The unique way for him to be somehow "famous" is as a retard.
>redefine So you admite you are incapable of pointing out or solve these events? This is high-school tier philosophy capability. >intelectual honesty More than your spam of "turanian/aryan" brainletism, of course.
This gives you at least the intelligence of a mexican. rofl
>why are you biased againts mexicans Wow, this was unexpected. Maybe you are not a mexican. Maybe the fact that you are north-american and look like OP's pic was all a ruse. ;) >you will consistently You are literally admiting you cannot point out these events, you dumb brainlet! lol!
>profound Jesus Christ. Have I ever seen a pseud post who isn't mainly concerned about his "profoundness"?
>i do not Well, at least you aren't commiting any typos faults in your little no-space world. That's a hint of improvement! >you will constantly You have repeated this with no evidence. That means you are incapable of pointing out any fault commited by anyone. You really are a brainlet. >chess I don't play board games, never did, never will.
>cheer ray up because he didn't commit typos in his war against spacing >"IHAVENOTCOMMITTEDTYPOSPREVIOUSLYYOUAREIGNORANTANDIHAVEPLENTYOFEVIDENCEINTHEFORMOFYOURBASELESSANDMEANINGLESSACCUSATIONSAGAINSTMEANDEVERYONEELSEWHOISINSPIREDBYREISWORDSYOUSIMPLYDEFINEANYTHINGYOUDISLIKEASSTUPIDANDFOOLISHANDPROCEEDFROMTHEREITISNOTSURPRISINGTHATYOUSHRINKFROMADEMONSTRATIONOFYOURINTELLECTUALINFERIORITYTAKEUPTHECHALLENGEBEAREALMANFORONCEINYOURPATHETICLIFE" You really are a brainlet. >ventures on metaphysics and epistemology There is literally no confrontation to Nietzsche's judgement against metaphysics in Rei's babble. So it literally inherits gnosticism wordplay. Pathetic. >individual accomplishment Yeah, he got this from Tony Robbins. LOL! >keeps avoiding IQ Hmm... so I guess the only part that is concordant with science is that "racial" component, right?
You haven't showed a hint of having at least the intelligence of Veeky Forums pseuds. Will you make it next time?
Owen Baker
When something, or someone, generates this kind of vile irrational vitriol, you just have to wonder if the object of scorn is perhaps more important and in the right than it appears...
Carson Peterson
Thank me for shilling this kid's ideology wordplay.
James Cruz
>95 Replies >19 posters Don’t you guys have a job?