Who would win WW3?

the USA or China?

With nukes? USA
Conventional war? USA
Conventional war would be a one sided ass rape. At present usa has complete naval dominance

I have on good authority that China numba 1

w-wwhat about their numbers? *shudders with fear and disgust*

Just more people to starve and rebel after the inevitable trade embargo hits and the power and water supply is cut off every single night. As long as the US doesn't get dumb and put boots on the ground it will win. The Chinese leadership would sue for peace once it's clear they can't win. Any prolonged war would destroy their legitimacy

Just because "muh waves of chinese over the yalu" doesn't mean we didn't utterly ass blast them body count wise.

But that was before they had superpower status. things are different now.

Frankly speaking, America have more nukes is simply because China intentionally restrict the warheads they own, they can easily produce as many as America has if they want.

>Conventional war would be a one sided ass rape. At present usa has complete naval dominance
Yeah, America also had naval dominance, even air dominance, in Korea war and Vietnam war, but you still can't "one sided ass rape" them. And now China is even more stronger than before,...geeze, I wonder...

Your idiotic, cocky attitude won't save you, Amerimutts. Your time is numbered!

>after the inevitable trade embargo hits
Trade embargoes cut both ways, user. The fat and lazy American populace would riot in 5 minutes if China stopped supplying their toys and trinkets.

The USA would probably win a war against all enemy nations combined.

Would hurt China more. Unskilled labor exists outside China, eg india or Philippines would gladly take up the slack.
China's conventional forces would be destroyed. As long as usa doesn't put boots on the ground China can't hit hem back and usa can just take out key assets like power stations and reservoirs and wait for the regime to crumble and Sue for peace

I think you should probably look up the definition of "conventional war," user.

t. Chang

>who would win
the rest of the world.

>India
good luck trusting Pajeet with your manufacturing

>implying it could be any worse than the garbage they're replacing

>With nukes?
Nobody.

>who wouldn't win
The rest of the world

Have fun starving in a nuclear winter user..

>implying a lot of high-end consumer goods aren't made in China

not Veeky Forums

like the McDonalds toy country could hold a candle to even one branch of the American military. The Air Force alone could take on China easy.

Nobody cares if everybody hates your "freedom".

>c
20 years after the US destroys and then rebuilds the Chinese economy they would revere America, just like Japan after WWII. Most of the hordes of Chinese I meet in Central Europe hate their country anyway.

Assuming Japanese economy rebuilt by US is beyond absurd.

>being this deluded
Goddamn american exceptionalism. Can't wait for the 'Pax' americana to finally end & for the chinese to take their place in the sun once again.

usa has the bigger army, the better funding and the better trained forces. how could china ever compete? nevermind the fact that everyone in the world feels nervous about the savage, semi-psychopathic culture of china, while the first world has normalized USA, as indeed usa is just a poor man's copy of europe with a few eccentricities, and would be inclined to side with them

It's not a coincidence that all of the really good Asian countries are countries that were taught how to be countries by Europeans.

>Japan - Occupied by America
>South Korea - US puppet state
>Taiwan - US puppet state
>Singapore - Former British colony
>Hong Kong - Former British colony

The best thing that could happen to China is a ruthless burgering so they end up looking more like Taiwan or Hong Kong.

The united states, basically it comes down to this: who can survive the longest without starving and running out of fuel.
America is a self sufficient nation, we actually do not need trade--us burgers would get along fine without it, and perhaps loose a little weight in the process.
China on the other hand is highly dependent on imports of grain and fuel, and can only sustain its population through extensive trade.
If anything, I think ethnic tensions within China itself could be exploited during a time of war.
Another big problem for china is their aging population, their one child policy in the long run, has screwed them, pic related.
Being a manufacturing nation, they are pretty dependent on having labor.

>nuclear war
>winnig

again?
When have the Chinese been anything more than a middle power in an obscure part of the world? Militarily they were routinely beat by much smaller countries. Technologically they have not been relevant since at least the age of discovery. Artistically and aesthetically they are a derivative culture only able to imitate other cultures. I will give you that once they were a fairly advanced people in matters of religion developing Taoism and Confucianism, but those days are long over.

If its fought in Asia China wins