>"The anti‐Semite has chosen hate because hate is a faith; at the outset he has chosen to devaluate words and reasons. How entirely at ease he feels as a result. How futile and frivolous discussions about the rights of the Jew appear to him. He has placed himself on other ground from the beginning. If out of courtesy he consents for a moment to defend his point of view, he lends himself but does not give himself. He tries simply to project his intuitive certainty onto the plane of discourse. I mentioned awhile back some remarks by anti‐Semites, all of them absurd: "I hate Jews because they make servants insubordinate, because a Jewish furrier robbed me, etc." Never believe that anti‐ Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti‐Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. It is not that they are afraid of being convinced. They fear only to appear ridiculous or to prejudice by their embarrassment their hope of winning over some third person to their side."
Read 'The Culture of Critique' by Kevin Macdonald. It'll answer why people become counter-semites.
Luke Martin
I hate /pol/, but your literally going to quote a cuck Stalinist?
Lucas Butler
What's the difference between an anti-semite and counter-semite?
Jason Edwards
>Sartre o... Stopped reading there.
Landon Hughes
One is a snarl word used to discredit rational discourse.
Justin Ward
>The sheer amount of ad hominem dehunaminization of a subject he doesn't like to talk about Sure hope this guy doesn't like Voltaire or Bakunin
Adam Green
>Sartre
Anti-science and stalinist.
Austin Wilson
>only /pol/ hates Jews Surely there are people not stupid enough to think this?
James Bell
Continental "philosophers" are truly repulsive.
Angel Howard
>I hate /pol/, but
Sure you do.
Oliver Morgan
And the other on an already widely used term, so why do you have to be a faggot about it instead of just using the term anti-semite?
Brandon Johnson
Counter-semites are what anti-semites call themselves to make it appear as if the Jews deserve it.
Jack Morgan
>SARTRE
Jackson Kelly
Thanks for the recommendation as always Kevin, but please try to contribute to the discussion rather than posting the title of your book in every single thread pertaining to Jews.
Levi Parker
Sure thing schlomo, even Theodor Herzl realised that anti-semitism was a naturual reaction to jews in large numbers.
Luis Collins
Bakunin was leftypol
William Anderson
Doesn't mean Sartre is wrong. The way he characterizes anti-semites in that monologue is literally how /pol/acks acts everywhere.
Adrian Ortiz
No he is wrong, because this pseudo psychological profile of anti-semities is nothing but a long list of false ad hominems that could be boiled down to >Anti semites are all just angry, irrational, and stupid so so sayeth me Sartre
John Butler
I wouldn't hate Jews if they didn't claim to be white and undermine white advocacy while steadfastly engaging in Jewish advocacy.
Jacob Rodriguez
>He is wrong >Literally demonstrate how he is correct by acting like a butthurt /pol/fag
Alexander Ortiz
Oh so I'm trying to intimidate you right now because I'm arguing on bad faith (because anyone who argues that Jews are not Gods chosen people inherently argue on bad faith).
Right. It's not you've been psychologically impressed of what a /pol/ack ought to be and now experience cognitive dissonance when someone provides counter examples to your stereotype, it's just that anyone who disagrees with you *has* to follow your predetermined pattern. Like okay, whatever you say my dude
Tyler Turner
You're literally following that predetermined pattern.
Look see here:
>"They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words."
You're obviously just a shitposter who really doesn't give a shit about rationality, argumentation nor do you believe that you can change your mind by engaging in debate.
The fact that you're even in this thread being asspained because of a 40 year old quote by a leftie, literally proves that you subconsciously agree with what he is saying.
Asher Phillips
>The fact that you're even in this thread being asspained because of a 40 year old quote by a leftie, literally proves that you subconsciously agree with what he is saying. Wew lad.
Cameron Thompson
WOAH you sure told them
Xavier Cooper
>he can’t even read
Jaxon Russell
>Anti semites are all just angry, irrational, and stupid I mean, if /pol/ is any indication
Lucas Mitchell
>because anyone who argues that Jews are not Gods chosen people inherently argue on bad faith Lol, you made an argument in bad faith right there. You actually know that not wanting to exterminate Jews isn't the same as believing they're God's chosen people, yet you make that ludicrous statement because you don't care about truthfully explaining yourself. You try to batter everyone with insults and hyperbole, assured you're in the right no matter what you actually say, because of your quasi-religious faith in your own anti-semitism.
You're following Sartre's description to a T
Adam Roberts
In my opinion, the extreme levels of Jew hate on /pol/ is because of the very large mixed race and Mexican majority there. They know they're not white but still want to bond with "Aryan /pol/" minority and hatred of Jews is the path of least resistance here.
Aiden Sanchez
Nice Pic. Who is the artist?
Nicholas Barnes
Experience of Veeky Forums has taught me that the people shrieking the loudest about this or that kind of -pol are migrants from reddit or 9gag. Like the people who respond to any negative criticism with 'wow triggered' or something like that, because it seems formally appropriate. Similarly, it seems to be redditors who most often go on about reddit spacing. They are the modern equivalent to the 13 y.o. boys who used ED to learn how to 'fit in' here ten years ago.
Jaxson Miller
You are battering what he's saying into a different shape so that it fits your description. He's not arguing in bad faith, he's being sarcastic, and you pretend to be oblivious to that in order to 'pin' Satre's criticism to le pol/ - that is bad faith.
Logan Edwards
>i hate /pol/ >calls someone a cuck You almost had me
Aaron Rivera
>Satre
Charles Mitchell
He does hate /pol/. All of you bedwetting nevilloid bugmen fling shit at /pol/acki, but you fall over yourselves aping the way they post with a fresh and interesting 'eyerolling twat' attitude. I bet there is one fruit bat on this board who is making sanitised Veeky Forums-tier smuggies as we speak.
Daniel Hughes
...
Easton Bailey
Bakunin's antisemitism is well known, same with Proudhon.
Charles Scott
It’s not an accurate or truthful term, so it’s use must be rejected
Xavier Richardson
>sartre
Zachary Martinez
If jews disappeared overnight anti-semites would just find someone else to hate immediately desu
Jonathan Ortiz
Ah, yes, "The Jew Cope."
Jaxson Diaz
Throw the jew down the well So my country can be free Then we have big party
Aaron Garcia
tl;dr
Grayson Russell
"First they came for the niggers, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't nigger. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew. Then they realised that all the problems had pretty much been solved, so they stopped coming for people."
Bertholt Brecht
Anthony Sanchez
>You're obviously just a shitposter who really doesn't give a shit about rationality, argumentation nor do you believe that you can change your mind by engaging in debate. >The fact that you're even in this thread being asspained because of a 40 year old quote by a leftie, literally proves that you subconsciously agree with what he is saying. Aooo yeah everything I said about you being hardlined psychologically impressed about what anti semiyies *need* to be is true. Okay. Like how any of this sounded intelligent to you amazes me, because it essentially confines that anything I say only fuels your confirmation bias
Luis Wood
>It's just blind hatred >There is absolutely 100% no reason to ever not likes Jews ever >Hatred of Jews is essentially a mental conditions
Hunter Long
Kek, you don't sound like someone who's problems will ever be solved.
Jace Adams
>everyone is part of some borg-like group and no one is an individual.
Identity politics are so boring, you special snowflake.
Nathan Murphy
>implying /pol/ aren't cucks who want to be dominated by strong man leaders
William Clark
>I'm so triggered >I want a safespace
Justin Walker
>I never engage in idpol >I have transended myself >I have no identity Hey guys, look at this user and LAUGH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Jaxon Rivera
>sex with children should be legal You're sick, user, kek.
Aaron Wright
One thing I like to do is look at contemporary people and imagine them in ethnically appropriate historical contexts, like for example if I see a white guy I try to imagine him as a medieval peasant or a viking.
Today I saw a surprisingly cute teenage Orthodox Jewish girl so I imagined her with a shaved head wearing a striped concentration camp uniform looking desperate. It was kind of hot actually.
Adam Cooper
How do you know he's Jewish?
Alexander Rogers
did Lincoln really say that
Aiden Campbell
>the Jews deserve it.
They do deserve it desu. Indeed, the original meaning of "antisemitism" is literally, opposition towards Jewish interests.
Parker Carter
I hate clickbait as much as the next guy but if you think it justifies genocide and proves there's a worldwide conspiracy, you are legitimately mentally ill.
Connor Foster
I don't speak for him and I don't think this justifies genocide. But there is an open anti-white agenda promoted by jews. That's not a matter of opinion at this point anymore.
Hudson Gomez
>But there is an open anti-white agenda promoted by jews.
You say it's promoted by Jews because that's what you're looking for. Have you been looking for the other people who have the same agenda? Because everyone knows that America in general is a race-baiting shithole, so everyone from Cletus in Alabama to Oprah Winfrey are doing it.
Eli White
You can do all you want after you go back to europe.
America belongs to Amerindians the same as europe belongs to europeans. How is this hard to get?
Cameron Kelly
Why do you think I care about sartre
Camden Flores
Yes.
Nolan Cruz
Why does America belong to the Amerindians? If the only claim to ownership to America is "they were here first" then we'd have to clarify which side you stand on in the Out-of-Africa Theory Vs. the Multiregional Theory.
Gavin Parker
...
Luis Wright
Yeah no fuck you. The natives are either all dead or stuck on reservation casinos huffing various chemical substances. The white population of America will not stand idly by and allow themselves to share in that sorry fate.
Ian Robinson
Amerindians are as native to America the same as europeans are native to europe.
America belongs to Amerindians the same as europe belongs to europeans.
So you agree with european replacement?
Elijah Miller
Wrong, everything belongs to the dinosaurs. Because dinosaurs are native to Pangea
Cooper Martinez
>So you agree with european replacement? By assorted third-worlders? Fuck no. Not in the US, not in Europe, and not in Asia either.
Evan Young
Checkmate, Atheists
Jordan Cooper
There is a difference between immigrants and settlers. Europeans built America (the country). t. Latino
Jeremiah Mitchell
Funny Thread.
Ethan Morales
So you agree with european replacement? So you agree with America belonging to Amerindians the same as europe belongs to europeans, then. Great for ya. >invaders need more than 20 diseases to replace inhabitants, even then they still lose most battles >invaders don't need anything more than their presence to replace inhabitants That's the difference. Then, you agree with european replacement?
Michael Harris
define "European replacement"
David Parker
>Sartres
Tyler Morales
>implying you have to be /pol/ to be antisemitic I'm a nationalist and I hate both G*rmans and J*ws.
Why is this text a spitting image of Goebbels rant?
Xavier Mitchell
Sorry, wrong image
Lincoln Nelson
I choose the 3rd Option: If the natives can show they can peacefully coexist and are willing to adapt to new cultures that positively affect their quality of life then they can be left unmolested. However if their culture, ideology, or practices are regressive or non-conducive to adaption and improvement and show an aggressive unwillingness to coexist, then they should be eradicated and replaced. and this is on a case by case basis. there is more to the criteria but i don't have much time to go into detail.
Wyatt Wright
>So you agree with America belonging to Amerindians the same as europe belongs to europeans, then. Great for ya. That is not what I said you disingenous fuckwad. The natives are either dead or stuck on reservations huffing paint. White europeans are the Americans now, America belongs to us.
