Who was included in Hitler's end game? His perfect world. Did the Bulgarians, Greeks and so forth have a place in his world?
What did he think about the Irish, Greek, Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, French, Spanish, Italian, Basque, Breton (France), English, Welsh, Irish, Scottish, Finnish, Danish, Swedish and Norwegian, Volga Finns, Chechens, Albanians and so forth, like literally every somewhat major cultures. Which ones would be allowed to "stay" without being 100% Germanized and have their women relaitvely un-KRAUTED? Did any other culture than Germans have a place in his perfect world? Thanks in advance my dudes.
According to Hitler >irish Good >greek Bad >bulgarian Good >croatian Good >czech Bad >french Bad >spanish Good >italian Good >Basque, Breton Who cares >english Bad >welsh, scottish Discount english >finnish,danish,swedish,norwegian Not too bothered >volga fins Who cares >chechens Tool >albanians Tool Hitler wasn't a strict racist. Plenty of what the Nazis would consider subhuman were allied with them against pure white people when it came to politics. The spaniards and italians were on his good side for the fascist alliance. The Bulgarians and Albanians were quite literally brown tools used to chip away at Yugoslavia and Greece who were respectively allied with the Soviets and British. The whole masterrace bullshit was a flexible facade for the Germs to gaze upon so he could secure his territorial goals. Basically any country that he offered his honorary aryan status to and was accepted, aka puppet states, should have been nuked.
Jeremiah Gomez
wow you read the txtboks
Lucas Rivera
You'd be surprised how basic knowledge gets raped on a daily basis on this board
Joseph Nelson
>Who was included in Hitler's end game? Whoever helped and agreed with him.
Seriously, he was retarded. If you were white and against communism, but opposed him, it made you untermensh or race traitor. If you were exactly the opposite of what their mythical aryan looked like, and you helped the nazis during war, you would be an honorary arian.
All this shit about master aryan race was cringe level propaganda.
Oliver Taylor
The more I look into Hitlers motives the more it looks like he is a mad man that just wanted total pointless war rather achieving anything possible.
Only reason the Germans rallied behind him was because they where pissed about WW1 and wanted to Make Germany Great Again so they gave the Nazi's the keys to the country and let them go ham
Not even Hitler's perfect world would save one of the dullest regimes in the history of totalitarian states. Seriously, each history chapter surrounding the failed painter and his pals from the National Socialist German Workers' Party as they fight what they call the „international Jewry“ has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the monumental imagery, the regimes‘ only consistency has been it’s lack of excitement and ineffective use of it’s military, all to make anti-semitism seem tactically Jewish, to make it’s misinterpreted Nietzschean inspiration seem inert. Perhaps the die was cast when Hitler ordered the Night of the Long Knives: he made sure his regime would never be taken seriously by anyone besides the world’s most ignorant, moronic extremists. Just a ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for his book. The Third Reich might have been anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly anti-adventurous in it’s refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least their military was good though „No!“ The Wehrmacht was dreadful, their campaigns ultimately a disaster. As I studied, I noticed that everytime they went to war, the Germans conducted one or another atrocity. I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that the Wehrmacht conducted an atrocity or conducted some form of „Jewish“ act, such as false-flag attacks. I stopped only after I marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. The mind of a National Socialist is so governed by autistic fantasies of romantism that they have no other way of acting. Later I read a lavish, Holocaust-denying paper on Adolf Hitler by David Irving. He wrote something to the effect of, „If these kids are reading /pol/, they will go on to read David Irving.“ And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read /pol/, you are, in fact, trained to read David Irving.
Heard a minimal amount of info about Greece in WW2.
Robert Green
I'm not sure anyone is surprised by that.
Evan Sanchez
I'd suggest going back and hitting the books some more, if those are your conclusions.
Nathan Sanchez
Literally just made some of these up or lied.
Gavin Martin
top kek
marry me
Hudson Myers
I dont think he cared as long as rivals (France, UK and SU) would be dismantled. Scandinavians would probably get annexed at some point. The rest would be too weak and divided to pose a threat.
Ryan Jackson
>invading Russia
Adrian Nelson
Not at all
Joseph Russell
>french >english >bad Hitler wanted UK to join the Axis and loved the French so much he wanted to conquer it and its peoples and it's cultural heritage instead of merely conquering their land and displacing their native populations to replace with Germans.
He didn't have an endgame, he made shit up on the run as he went
Aiden Reed
What part of >flexible Did you not understand? Whatever Hitler's initial plans they, evidently, didn't materialise and he went berserk on the Anglo. Have you even seen Nazi German propaganda? As for France, upon invading them, Hitler reenacted the railway scene the French did to the Germans in WWI, on the same railroad with the same coaches, just to humiliate them. He took direct control of a huge chunk of France with most of it's resources and only allowed Pétain to have his Vichy France when he begged for it, and he barely gave him anything in terms of territory. Not to mention that he never viewed Pétain as am equal to Mussolini, despite the old man constantly sucking up to him.
Adam Reyes
>„No!“ Holy shit haha This is a top tier shitpost
Adam Parker
unfortunately all of them had a place. Hitler is oft mistaken for a genocidal maniac and Germanic imperialist. He wasn't. Though he should have been
John Sanchez
Vichy France was perfectly acceptable to Hitler as well. There's a reason there was a puppet government instead of just becoming a conquered land. UK/France were political/ideological enemies of Germany, not racial enemies like the Jews.
