”””Indo-Europeans”””

>”””Indo-Europeans”””

Attached: image.jpg (1125x743, 785K)

>Dravidians are Indo-Europeans

Those are Pakistanis you mong

>genetics arent real because fuck ypeepeaux

Pakistanis are Indians from anywhere on the subcontinent who are Muslim. There were tons of populations exchanges after the creation of Pakistan. Pakistan doesn't exist for ethnic or historical reasons. It only exists because Muslims cannot live along side other people unless they are in control.

Those people are totally not native to Pakistan. Also google images says they are Tamil, a Dravidian people in southern India and Sri Lanka.

>white
No such thing.
Pseudoscience lovers are surely entertaining.

No, those people are native Punjabi Pakistanis.

My family and I look like that, only much darker.

And we're all North Indians who speak an Indo-European language.

Fuck off brown subhuman
My afghan ancestors conquered yours

>implying that Pakistanis are ethnically differentiable from Indians

How come Gypsies look lighter than Pakistanis?
Did they abduct Slavs?

You see non-Whites, i see Nordic Slavs with a cephalic index of 73.5 :)

Attached: R1a-M417_The_Beast.png (630x472, 134K)

The point is that Pakistanis and North Indians and Bangladeshis are Indo-Europeans yet are darker than niggers.

The whole Indo-European meme is trash.

Now picture them with White skin

Attached: a.jpg (483x727, 113K)

Some dirty shitskin towelhead from Iran came up to me today and said he was an Aryan and an Indo-European and related to us European people.

I just laughed and smacked the shit out the deluded little hadji in front of his woman and kids.

785 KB JPG
>”””Indo-Europeans”””
is a linguistic group, not a racial one, you absolute retard

Malwa Punjabis are pic related

Indians are mix of Aryan and Yamanya Ancient races

Attached: image.jpg (1125x927, 1.08M)

>People who got conquered and converted by Aryan migrants are Indo-Europeans.

This is what happened in everywhere, so yes?

Well, most of the modern day European groups are autosomally very closely related to the early Indo-Europeans. However, the same is true only for a minority of Indian groups (though a minority of 1.3 billion would still amount in many millions of people).

By your shit logic, Europeans and Russians wouldn't be Indo-European either

Well, most of the modern day European groups are autosomally very closely related to the early Indo-Europeans. However, the same is true only for a minority of Indian groups (though a minority of 1.3 billion would still amount in many millions of people).

Read

>Well, most of the modern day European groups are autosomally very closely related to the early Indo-Europeans. However, the same is true only for a minority of Indian groups

Except that's absolutely false though

If by early Indo-Europeans you mean Yamna then no, they aren't.

56%

Sure. But you can tell there's a strong ethnic connection.

Bottom mid could pass for an Irishman

Compare it with this.

Attached: black+albino-384x640.jpg (384x640, 57K)

Attached: Colored_people.jpg (1504x1470, 1.55M)

>By your shit logic, Europeans and Russians wouldn't be Indo-European either
But that's wrong. There is a clear progression from Corded Ware -> Trzciniec -> Balts and Slavs. Eastern and Northern Europeans still look like their ancestors.

You can't say the same about Iranians and Indians.