Why do people here admire the romanovs?

>soviets were wise enough to kill innocent children
nazis were wise enough to kill commies like you

>They were corrupt dictators
Yes, but they were less corrupt dictators than every single Russian leader that came after they were slaughtered.

Maria was so beautiful

lol muh boi pudin isnt corrupt he just likes his oligarch nibbas

Not only in physical appearance, but also in mind.
She was the most devoted of the romanov sisters and was so kind and gentle, while always joyful and full of life

+
>Maria Nikolaevna was the most beautiful, typical Russian, good-natured, cheerful, even-tempered, friendly girl. She loved and was able to converse with everyone, especially with common people, soldiers. She always had a lot in common with them. They said that she resembled Alexander III in appearance and strength. She was very strong. When it was necessary to move the ailing Alexei Nikolaevich anywhere, [he’d] shout, “Mashka, carry me!” She always carried him. Commissar Pankratov loved her very much, outright adored her. She had the ability for drawing and needlework.

A true angel

Attached: Maria_Anastasia (6).jpg (1280x1119, 577K)

>they kept the Russian people oppressed and had no plans to do otherwise
>good thing the Soviets were wise

freemasonry has been a force for good mostly though.

larping autists who lose their shit over everything communists do

because I wanna pound alexei's tight little boipucci

monarcucks to the firing squad

>tfw she got horribly killed by subhuman jewish commies

Attached: 9e411f3df8fd288de05c6d028dc6069f.jpg (310x236, 21K)

>tfw there is no more White Russian diaspora
>only seedy Russian Jews and human traffickers

The Russian people were infinitely better under the Soviets.

Attached: 25FC8433-8DC4-4B78-BC57-1677B7E691E3.jpg (500x704, 93K)

Attached: 1515535162042.png (633x758, 293K)

Their killers and what came after them were so despicable, that even most liberal democrats would admire a monarchy by comparison to the Red Guard, Cheka, Lenin, and the Bolsheviks.

If you want moralize history, you can find a more comparable match in the Bolsheviks and various White factions, who were both ready to massacre and destroy without regard.

It's important to note that Tsar Nicholas II was mostly an incompetent leader, and that his loss of power was due more to being entirely out of touch with the country, than some popular uprising throwing off Tsardom and embracing communism. (the Bolshevik party was barely a blip until after Nicholas had fallen)

He was blamed for Russia's disastrous involvement in WWI, and it's humiliation before Germany. You couple this with no clear policy on the various leftist and reformist movements bubbling up, and it's a powder keg waiting to explode.

Socialist and communist activists might be "exiled" (read, neetdom with a state pension) and not even forced to remain in their exile, or forced into labor. Many simply took a train right back to where they were before, with a heroic story of suffering in the name of revolution. Then, despite no actual crackdown on the socialist agitators, even a democratic popular protest would be met with soldiers gunning down the protesters. There was simply no coherent policy other than weakness and occasional 'tard rage. Tsarism was not destroyed in 1917, it was destroyed some thirty or so years earlier, when the state became scared of revolutionary agitators, ready to gun down any anonymous citizens that gathered to call for reform, and even Tsarist officers would refuse to shake the hands of gendarmes. That was the doom of Tsarism.

Finally, I'd add that no one seems to outright defend Nicholas on his own, but that an incompetent tyrant (Nicholas) is preferable to a competent one (Stalin).

Didn't he also try to initiate "Russification" of the minorities living in Russia? Doesn't sound like that's a smart idea when the 1897 census literally shows Russians only make up 44% of your population.

He was certainly better than rennin, marx & stalin.....

Say what ever you want but the bolsheviks fucked russia up.....no matter who is in charge , Russia is a wild land full of awesome people....

Imperialist russia was preferable to communism which is an impossibility with frail humans

Lennin....i meant

Attached: nobis.png (1192x1192, 246K)

Sure you did, Tojo.

Attached: 259686_orig.jpg (631x800, 153K)

Only a bunch of monarchist LARPers do, which is hardly the majority of the board. Russian and French Revolutions were 100% justified.

And they weren't even Russian, they were Germans who barely spoke the language. Yes what happened to them was a mistake, they should've just been exiled and I don't advocate for mass murder, but they were also inept rulers that brought Russia to ruin. Same case with the Bourbons who wasted their entire budget on propping up a foreign revolution just to get revenge on their Hannover Brit rivals and ended up bankrupting France.

The French Republic+Empire and the Soviet Union were MASSIVE improvements over their predecessor states.

Name an event in Russian history from 18th till 20th century where 650,000 people were killed intentionally by their own government.

only sub-humans would hurt that qt

Attached: 1519592703163.jpg (768x768, 418K)

They were dangerous to the bolsheviks as they could have Been the face of a rebellion against them.

The French Revolution was messy, but ultimately a good thing because it resulted in the creation of a free republic. The Russian revolution ended up creating the most oppressive state of the 20th century, a state so vile that it had to build a double-wall covered in barbed wire to stop people from trying to leave.

They were totally inept but weren't consciously killing millions like Stalin.

but /pol/ hates communism