Can someone explain me the "lets"
>manlets
>lanklets
>etc
Can someone explain me the "lets"
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wiktionary.org
twitter.com
Think
>pig
>piglet
Lanklet makes no grammatical sense. But leave it to manlets to be stupid and short as well.
>t. brainlet
Manlet - too short
Lanklet - too tall
Someone lacking something in some department.
>tfw letlet
6'0" and under is manlet region
6'1" - 6'7" is God tier height
6'8" is too tall unless you're a pro athlete height.
6'2'' here. I feel 6'3'' is optimal height.
and what about the other "lets" i've seen on /fit?
Correction
Lanklet - tall but skinny dyel
When I think of manlet I always think of the German word "Männlein" (transl. "little man"). Apparently there's an English equivalent, too: "manling" en.wiktionary.org
Suffix[edit]
-ling
A suffix forming diminutives with the meanings of:
a small, immature, or miniature version of what is denoted by the main stem.
a follower or resident of what is denoted by the original root or stem.
I come to the conclusion that "manling" is the correct word in this context.
>manlet
>"-let" implies a shortage or lack of something, in this case manhood. the implication is that short men are lesser men
>lanklet
>"-let" doesn't imply anything, it's just there as a direct and lazy rebuttal to "manlet"
wow manlets can't even come up with good insults
manlet = op of this thread, becase he hasnt learned yet and probably never will
Brainlet
Little brain
Testlet
Little test
And so on
Hamlet = no ham.
lanklet?
Lanklet doesn't even make sense, manlets are fucking retarded
lanklet = tall with no muscle mass (small)
Lanklet is when you are tall and skinny, like scrawny
You can be tall and not be a lanklet
Someone said "parentlet" the other day and it had me cracking up
But lankLET implies a lack of lank. Lanky guys should just be called lanks. If you're not lanky you're a lanklet.
I agree but lanklet already stuck
True. It just shows that manlets are brainlets.
t. lanklet