Great. Another animal person depiction of a kobold. It's mice this time

Great. Another animal person depiction of a kobold. It's mice this time.

Weren't they originally just ugly little men?

Other urls found in this thread:

christies.com/LotFinder/lot_details.aspx?from=searchresults&intObjectID=4204177&sid=90568c80-c1bd-4eed-8de5-c4c8cee01523
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Pretty much. They've been interpreted as lizards by D&D (and establish a draconic connection somehow), rat-creatures by Warcraft, dogs by the Japanese for some reason, and now what looks like a gopher.

Honestly, a gopher actually makes sense to be as a design, as they actually tunnel, which is a key trait of kobolds in general.

On a similar not, gnolls used to be just kind of ugly dudes as well, but they seem to have been universally accepted as a kind of humanoid hyena as society acquaints itself with the hyena's rather disgusting habits.

Is it actually preferable to have every fictional being default to ugly person or pretty person? I think not, I like when people use their imagination to think up different thinks.

>ugly person or pretty person
You forgot animal person.

I didn't forget. OP bitched about animal persons, thus I only listed the traditional alternatives, which I don't regard as particularly dazzling choices.

That's a beaver

>Goblins
>Ugly people
>Orcs
>Ugly people
>Gnolls
>Ugly people
>Kogolds
>Ugly people
>Trolls
>Ugly people
Etc

>Humans
>People
>Dwarves
>Short people
>Elves
>Pretty People

It makes sense to me.

WHAT A CUTE LITTLE BEASTMAN

>>Goblins
>>Ugly people
>>Kobolds
>>Ugly people
Makes sense, as they were originally regional variants of the same type of being. "Goblin" is literally a distant corruption of "Kobold".
>>Orcs
>>Ugly people
According to Tolkien. He probably derived the word from either the name of the demon Orcus (which looks nothing like a human) or from the proto-English "warg", which is literally just an evil murderer.
>>Gnolls
>>Ugly people
>>Trolls
>>Ugly people
Yeah, with massive noses, foot long ears, cow's tails, and hairy backs. Plenty of identifying marks.

>Dwarves
>pretty

Confusingly, the dwarfs of the later Heroes' games setting live underground, but use bears as mounts. You try bringing a bear underground like that.

Living in caves isn't the same as living in tunnels.

Maybe it is just arguing semantics?

Anyway, what is your gripe with the design, OP?

In the original Germanic folklore origina, they could appear as flames, animals or child-sized men.

I'm more offended by the design of that fucking crossbow.

Art gets crossbows wrong more often than not.

How are you even supposed to put your foot through the stirrup?

Just because the artist didn't bother to learn anything about the subject he was drawing doesn't mean he's a bad artist!

It actually means he's a terrible artist.

It also has two triggers.

Well,you see, Might and Magic draws heavily from RPGs, not from actual mythology. The first RPG picture of kobols in first D&D depicted them as a sort of small dog guys with pointy tails,and over tail evolved into the dragon-worshiping small lizard fags we know today.

Monster representation in pop culture products also evolves and changes over time,user. You can either be a whiny bitch about, take it as it is, or make your own version in your setting.

Gnolls used to be,literally, gnome and troll hybrids,similar in aspect to hobgoblins, in the first edition of D&D back in 1974. And they come from a novel from 1920 or so, and there they weren't given a defined shape; the only thing said about them is that they have tentacles.

>"hey, crossbows have those... metal thingies on front. I wonder why"
>"Wondering complete, I don't give a fuck. Time to make it ~fancy~"

I'm triggered

If you're going with Tolkien, peoples tend to stand more for various classes and monsters are generally some form of representation of a more nebulous concept. Of course, it's very loose on the interpretations but it can make sense through that kind of lens.

>gopher actually makes sense to be as a design, as they actually tunnel, which is a key trait of kobolds in general

I like this. It makes the whole dungeon thing start to make a lot more sense.

isn't that what his pointy shoes are for? :^)

Doubtful, as he would only awkwardly fit the frontmost tip and could easily slide off while pulling the string.

>According to Tolkien. He probably derived the word from either the name of the demon Orcus (which looks nothing like a human) or from the proto-English "warg", which is literally just an evil murderer.

No. Tolkien derived the word from "Orcneas", which appears as the name of a type of foul creature listed in Beowulf. The poem does not give any further information about it, however.

>In the original Germanic folklore origina, they could appear as flames, animals or child-sized men.

Now I want to make kobolds in my setting into child-sized fire elementals.

That's at once the most fitting and most terrifying personality for fire elementals, that of children. I know it specified size, not personality, but a toddler in the terrible twos but MADE OF FIRE is not exactly what you want in a fire elemental.

>first D&D depicted them as a sort of small dog guys with pointy tails.

Here's your pic.

Learn to read

...

Tunneling is really just a D&D thing though. Wasn't their original shtick just being fairies that weren't weak to iron?

>A little fire person running around your house touching all your stuff
>You tell him to stop but he just yells "NO" and hides in the closet. Your clothes are now all on fire
>It's not that big a deal, really, compared to the larger matter that everything else you own is on fire too
>Goblin pacts, not even once

Nope. Mine spirits. Kobold=Cobalt. They were originally used to explain why people who worked in certain mines were prone to getting sick (cobalt poisoning, natch). Around the late Middle Ages they had an image change and turned from evil mine disease spirits who cause collapses into benevolent dwarflike beings who secretly guide miners to rich veins of ore and knock on the walls to warn from incoming cave-ins.

Yep,that's it,though I remembered them with fur instead of scales. Seems the reptilian theme was present way before I thought. Thanks for contributin',user.

Still doesn't have much to do with the folklore.

Is there something wrong with me when I see that, and I image hobbits are sentient Irish cats with an intense dislike of bullshit?

How dare you insult Casanunda, the greatest ladies man to ever carry around his own stepladder.

It really depends who was drawing them. here's a nice 2e one.

Crossbows obviously reload by themselves, fueled by your hatred of demons. That's why you can dual-wield hand crossbows, right?

It's narrativium. The instant someone picks up two pistol like weapons, they instantly become capable of shooting people while striking weird poses and firing doves out of their ass.

Man, this would make for some great adventures.

Didn't ancient and medieval cultures use children to work in the mines due to the cramped working conditions?

What if kobolds are created from the spirits of child laborers that died in the mines? Their ectoplasm congeals into a wax-like substance. Their apparitions become sparks of life within their tallow forms. They become living candles in the dark doomed to haunt the mines forever.

Hand crossbows are just the most unaesthetic weapons in my opinion. Fucking weak try making a pistol proxy.

>"2nd greatest lover on the disk"
>"2nd only?"
>"I try harder."

At least one seems to have existed IRL though.
christies.com/LotFinder/lot_details.aspx?from=searchresults&intObjectID=4204177&sid=90568c80-c1bd-4eed-8de5-c4c8cee01523