What are some valid criticisms against Age of Sigmar besides "old is good, new is dumb"?

What are some valid criticisms against Age of Sigmar besides "old is good, new is dumb"?

Other urls found in this thread:

games-workshop.com/en-GB/Sanguinary-Guard
games-workshop.com/en-GB/Blood-Angels-The-Sanguinor-Exemplar-of-the-Host
twitter.com/AnonBabble

The game is actually fun.

Just needs a system to balance games.

It's more expensive than buying the old one second hand.

Also, 40k conversion potential

My main gripe is about the new setting.
I loved the medieval/renaissance look of the Old world, it was at once familiar and fantastical. I've also played the setting since the days of Heroquest and I grew fond of how the setting treated Fantasy elements.

Now, it's a very shallow setting, full of bling and superheroes fighting at a cosmic scale. It's not as appealing.

This.

If they wanted to reboot the game, fine.

There was no need to throw out a beautiful, deep setting with decades of lore.

Want to rehaul your game with new rules that make it easier? Fine. But this was a mistake.

Also, the game lacks any semblance of balance whatsoever.

casual shit that destroyed old WHFB

You betcha!

This, to me, mostly.

The old world was a good setting and I liked the delicate politics of the empire and the danger of other nations ambitious and all of that. Now is just the fighty bits, in fantasy space.

read the original post, dipshit.