>we're playing Pathfinder
>to keep things balanced, we only use material from the CRB
We're playing Pathfinder
>We're going to try [X Type of Game/Setting/Theme]
>Because we don't know anything else we're playing a modified Pathfinder
It's decent for what it does but people need to expand their horizons.
Reminder that this is what shitty GMs ACTUALLY think. Because they don't understand the 3e framework and are fucking retard losers with retard loser taste.
>5% chance of critical failure or success
>binary pass/fail system based on a swingy d20 roll
>Fuckfinder is a ripoff with retard fanboys
When 4th edition came out. And fuck Pathfinder, the D&D clone. AD&D has the best writing and adventures of any swords and sorcery RPG I've ever played.
And I've played...
>AD&D
>D&D 3rd/3.5
>Mongoose's settings
>Pathfinder
>WoD (depends on the game)
>GURPS 3rd (low tech settings)
>Green Ronin shit
>d20 system
And about 12 more systems I can't remember since I started going for a security clearance and had to delete them 'cause, you know, Uncle Sam and copyright law.
Anyway, the writing for the others SUCKS.
When a single four on one fight lasted four sessions.
That was your DM.
You made this thread like, three days ago.
We get it, dnd is shit.
>liking 3.x
>good taste
Pick one.
ADnD had good settings. But the rules are bonkers and cumbersome, the layout and editing trash, and the writing is some of the dorkiest sperg shit I've ever seen. I mean, q. v's, really?