Reminder that LINK is fucked

reminder that LINK is fucked

Remember that LINK can be staked so you earn dividends

I feel sorry for all these poeple who bought 25 plus cent bags last night after that LARPER asshole blaster tricked them. Newfags will believe anything and he's been waitig to drop his 75c link bags for months now.

no it cant

remidner that developmennt on link stopped a month ago and contrary to popular belief there is not 2 devs, there is only 1

>some random asshole one post

Or

>consistent well thought out posts with proof

Sounds like your asshole is blasted mate

Yes it can.

>what is a private repo
reminder that you fucking retards gonna kill yourselfs in a year.

okay boys time to invest in LINK the fudfags are here

Hahaha some people bought link for 30. my sides

>what is an open source project

do you need your brain checked? or did your bull just f*** you too hard last night after he got done with your wife?

t uninformed bagholder

no, it literally can't. what you're referring to was a TWEET from a non-LINK affiliated project referring to a NONEXISTENT suggestion of something that COULD be possible. also, such a scheme would more than likely carry the risk of you forfeiting your LINK if the node failed to meet SLA terms.

This argument again... Realize decentralization means trustless. This is HUGELY important. If some centralized node was providing the data, you're now trusting that node alone and lose all the dispute resolution benefits that public ledger distributed systems bring.

hi mr bagels, how about you suck our cocks instead huh? do you have some beaten wife syndrome that makes you stuck on chainlink slack too?

what a loser, LMAO

kek, just make sure to announce your live stream on here when you do it user, I wanna see that shit.

Example:
Bank A initiates a SWIFT transfer with Bank B with Bank A's private, centralized node. But somehow it gets messed up, maybe a clerk typed something wrong. Now you have a he said she said battle between Bank A who says yes we sent it and Bank B who says they didn't get it. This is now a costly problem.

Same situation but on a public, decentralized ledger, they both just look at the history on the blockchain and say oh, looks like there was a mistake on Bank A's end and then fixes it.

Huge, huge, huge difference.

i hope swift just drops link
the pink wojaks will be great

do you really think it would even be a good idea to keep that open source if he is going to be having the big banks etc as majority node operators? Do you think the banks like the idea of open source or proprietary platform?

Git is just a tool, not the fucking end all of development.

minibagels is a fucking basement dwelling 450lb NEET that likes to larp as a whale. The only thing he has in common with a whale is the size of his wasitline.

He tries to act holier than thou but the closest this faggot has been to a woman is when his mum brings in his tendies.

He still hasn't apologised to her for punching her last night when he got JUST'd from missing out on the moon.

I bet his dick is crusted over with so must kraft cheese smegma. He sits in slacks and discords 24 fucking 7 picking said cheese off his dick and licking it.

The only comfort he has is when Tyrone comes over to service his mum and he gets fleeting experience of a father figure though the moans of, "Das rite, suck dat nigga dik white bitch" through his bedroom wall.

Reminder, already priced in.

What about high value uses like remittances? Derivatives?

Yeah thought so.

>"hurrdurr they'll just run their own nodes!"

Look up PSD2.
Financial institutions are about to be FORCED to open up their APIs to third-party providers.

Decentralized nodes are coming, whether the banks like it or not.

And that's without bringing up the obvious benefits regarding quality, price, and security of having a free marketplace of nodes.

You don't earn dividends per se, but staking link does get you more contracts, thus more revenue.
It boils down to the same thing: stake Link = more money.