>"Celestial Bureaucracy" means he's using Chinese thematics.
No it doesn't, especially since he didn't reference it as a celestial bureaucracy, he referenced it as a divine bureaucracy.
>Have you tried not playing D&D?
Shit, I never play D&D, but all the autistics on this board are absolutely addicted to it and use it as the base reference for all their shitty, speculative, NARPfag threads, like this one.
>We have access to practically infinite energy, since the sun keeps shooting it at us, yet somehow electricity still costs money.
1. Electricity does not cost money. Access to the electrical grid does.
2. We don't have the means to eliminate energy, let alone material scarcity at this point in time. A high fantasy world, or an interstellar civilization, however, certainly would.
3. Even setting aside the fact that we don't yet have the means to defeat scarcity, it's more than obvious that the contemporary economy is an incredibly irrational and inefficient means to distribute the resources we do have, especially when it comes to something like electrical power.
>Not automatically implied by space travel, mate.
Seeing as that we already have quite advanced 3D printing and experimental nanofabrication today, a civilization that has the capacity to readily travel between stars will be significantly more advanced in that regard. Even if it isn't the case, there are the two other facts I mentioned that effectively eliminate scarcity - 1) the vast abundance of resources in space, and 2) virtual reality.
>That's a big assumption you've got there.
Capitalism past the point of scarcity is simply madness.
>You are entitled to hold this opinion, as people do now and did throughout history. But there's no evidence to suggest that it'll become more correct as time progresses.
It's already true now, and has been for a few decades.
>Sounds like you need to study cultures other than your own as well as basic economics
>t. bourgeoisie high school student