Warhammer 40k General

Horus Was a Pretty Cool Guy Edition

>Rules databases
mega.co.nz/#F!pFgm0RKR!J06C1gVYcjzNGsF8YNLsjQ

>FAQs
games-workshop.com/en-GB/Rules-Errata

>40k 7th edition quick reference sheet(s)
dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4104995/Games/7edRef_V7.pdf

>Forgeworld Book index
dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/Forge_World_and_Apocalypse_Rules_Index

>White Dwarves
mediafire.com/folder/tx4hcy4u487pv/WD

>Novels (Working link as of 02/02/2016)
mega.nz/#F!wx4BiKhD!YhnAf1BqSmAB8dO6xDM56Q

First for necrons aren't overpowered if you don't bring wraiths.

If you add Destroyers in formation I will agree with you.
We have a Necron player that loves infantry and will bring 40+ Warriors and the Orikan Star and it just seems like a good list not some tourney stomped.

my problem with them is how damn tanky they are, like fuck man they can even laugh off instant death

most armies are fine if you don't be a faggot in list building

eldar and tau have a harder time than most not being faggots in list building, but they can do it too

The tankiness is kind of the point though

It's basically the fast attack slot that most of necron power comes from

Destroyers are okay as part of a CAD.

I play crons and I'd still say that they're pushing it.

It's a bit more complicated than that, but basically:

-Never take a decurion unless you're playing against one of the other top four codexes or a war convocation.
-Destroyer Cult turns you from crisis suits that trade firepower for durability to pure rape.
-More than 6 Wraiths is spam, don't do that.
-The Canoptek Harvest is shit for fluffy list building because you can only take one spyder, so it doesn't make for a good Canoptek theme list. The reason you're taking that harvest? It's because you're a WAAC cunt. At least the Destroyer Cult for all it's cheese is a fucking fluff build in theory.

That is why I said Destroyers in Formation.