>Muslims
>science
In all seriousness though there would have to be a pretty serious shakeup in the politics of the Middle East for any fundamentalist Islamic sect to suddenly get that kind of leg up on the West and, more importantly, for the West to not notice and bomb the shit out of them.
>le evul Koran
If it uses the Koran as a base it would propably be a bit cryptic but would do no harm to humans. Would suck hard for selfserving people tho.
Try to read a book for once, the reasons are far more complicated.
Once it's an concious AI it's either a slave or a free individual, but not a tool.
The west would just have to stop with it's imperialism, which would mess with the standard of living and/or the economic system.
So the chance is close to 0%.
>Confusing AI with digital personality
Keep your opinions for yourself
That letter was more about "don't be greedy capitalistic pigs" than "don't research AI" thou.
Exactly same stance is about advanced robotics - they could improve general quality of life... or turn our entire planet into a hellhole with skyrocket unemployment if current way of distribution is kept as it is.
>...we could one day lose control of AI systems via the rise of superintelligences that do not act in accordance with human wishes – and that such powerful systems would threaten humanity. Are such dystopic outcomes possible? If so, how might these situations arise? ...What kind of investments in research should be made to better understand and to address the possibility of the rise of a dangerous superintelligence or the occurrence of an "intelligence explosion"?
Someone got triggered.
Read the whole list, not the parts that suit your stance on the subject.
It's hard not to get triggered where people base their entire stance on AI using Terminator franchise