/whf/ Warhammer Fantasy General - Brets Are Back Edition

> What's the font you're using?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caslon_Antique

> You should definitely post some of this to the 1d4chan
I intend on it, but wanted to see if there was any quick feedback from here before I did.

> connect Garudas more clearly to Tzeentch and Naga to Slaanesh
Their caste section was getting a bit long so I didn't want to put anything more than needed as far as a summary goes. I fully intend on doing an extended write up for the two since they're unusual from the rest of the Beastmen, though, and that will include their relations to the Dark Gods.

>matchlock pistol

Heresy.

But seriously, if the Bretonnian peasants looked as crazy as that, they'd be almost justified in it. But as far as I can tell, they just look like...well, peasants. None of that crazy stuff really included, sadly.

...

...

And that, I believe, is me out.
I might be able to find a few stragglers.

It's not included because it's a pain in the ass to include on models which aren't SUPPOSED to be insane (like Flagellants or Chaos). Just for flavor purposes. But in the Bret books I read (from the point of view of knights), I remember the attitude being closer to the one that an owner shows a pet rather than a feudal lord his servants.

Like, some of the knights saw their peasants as complete moron/idiots who couldn't take care of themselves and could barely hold a spear and thus needed their protection (but should also do their duty as pole-axe-carrying guard dogs) while others saw them in the old-fashioned/third-world view of dogs as useful tools, but don't bring them inside or we might catch fleas and kill them if they're a burden.

And when describing the peasants, they were mutated and inbred (albeit with a few able serjeants).

I feel ya. Didn't want it to be too long.

(Anti Raj Bagha crowd is going to throw a fit...)

...

...

Shame that the resolution on these pdfs is so bad.
I might have to look at stripping these images from more conventional scans.