Is "magical realm" actually a thing...

I've only seen it in more subtle ways. Usually an NPC the party can immediately identify as important as it clearly represents the DM's ideal waifu. The most reaction that gets is a sort of collective-yet-hidden-from-the-GM sigh. I imagine most people who want to go full piss forest either turn to online ERP or are just autistic (or both)

It is absolutely a thing, yes. Far more prevalent online as far as I'm concerned, but yes people do insert their fetishes into tabletop roleplaying games. 90% stories on Veeky Forums are fake or highly exaggerated for effect, but that doesn't change the fact that some people are just horndogs with no social grace.

Hell, let me put it that way, people insert their fetishes into Fallout mods. Why do you think they wouldn't do so in a much more malleable medium?

Well, magical realm is different from that, since it involves sharing your fetishes with people who aren't specifically looking for weird sex stuff. Porny Fallout mods more imply the genuine existence of ERP.

It is. It's especially noticeable among the more spergy people who cannot into impulse control or social interaction. And it's not exclusive to GM:s, but it's the most noticeable when they do it.

>mfw furfaggot at my table starts calling my setting "uncreative" because it only got humans in it

No, that comic only works if everyone turns off their brain and accepts the idea that it's okay for someone to use their fetish in place of logic, humor, or style.

It's not even an amusing comic, just one with some really awful attempts at jokes followed by a flyweight attempt at a punchline, all with the stupid message of "if you give the pee fetish guy a chance, he'll show you how 'compelling' pee can be," all without actually showing anything that makes the idea a good one.

It's the sort of thing you could expect from tumblr. Unfunny, and with a backwards message about tolerance that borders on insanity.

Or it's irony.

I don't think you really understand what irony is, which I guess is ironic.

The idea of "dude you can make everything work with RP! Lmao! Just give it a chance!" that people on here love to regurgitate only works if you are going in with literally no expectations and aren't taking anything seriously. Then it can be fun for a session or two.

But if I am expecting a gritty medieval game, for example, get myself into an appropriate mood and develop my character accordingly, I will get very pissed indeed (no pun intended) if the DM eventually springs his magical realm on us or does something lolsorandumb. It would completely ruin the mood. I'm here for the game that was advertised, not some wacky fantasy mad libs.

It think the message was less about pee and more about "you could still have fun", but don't really disagree with you. I certainly enjoy a few things that are intentionally dumb, but there's a vague line where shit just becomes insufferable, and it's usually where someone with questionable tastes asks "why you can't just turn your brain off"

No it's irony. It assumes you've read the original and then does the opposite you expect. That makes it irony.

>But if I am expecting a gritty medieval game, for example, get myself into an appropriate mood and develop my character accordingly, I will get very pissed indeed (no pun intended) if the DM eventually springs his magical realm on us or does something lolsorandumb. It would completely ruin the mood. I'm here for the game that was advertised, not some wacky fantasy mad libs.

>tfw the DM literally put Megaman into their campaign

Have you read the original post the responses to you're responding to now?

>this comic is what happens if you don't take things too seriously, i would love to come across something like this

>in place of logic, humor, or style.
This is not expressed in the comic at all.
Rather the opposite.
It is okay for someone to use their fetish WITH logic, humor and style.

>without showing anything that makes the idea a good one.
Since you dislike the comic you fail to entertain the things it brings up for long enough to see that each of the panels from the first implies certain virtues necessary for a good RPG.
4th panel: combat and somewhat interesting enemies
5th panel: good party interaction and downtime activities, and a group that gets along.
6th panel: epic conclusion, a point to the storyline, useful abilities
7th panel: humor and a character that's actually roleplaying
8th panel: depth to the character, consequences, humor and tragedy, actual prose, more actual roleplaying

Meanwhile the original comic had
>players not giving a shit about the DMs plothooks
>no actual roleplaying
>not liking some part of the game being resolved with IRL physical violence

... wait
>Unfunny, and with a backwards message about tolerance that borders on insanity.
Oh that explains that.
/pol/ pls go.

>It would completely ruin the mood
This should go without saying.
Jarring shifts of tone are bad whether it's magical realm or not.
If i come into a game expecting semi dark but whacky adventurer antics and we end up dealing with genocide, that would be off putting.
If i come into a game expecting diplomatic resolutions to most conflicts, and lots of roleplaying and i get to besiege barbarian hordes instead, that would be off putting.
If i come into a game expecting long intriguing horror with some connection to the characters and i get PCs dying every session, that would be off putting.
If i come into a game expecting a lighthearted high fantasy epic, and end up with a lolsorandom wacky adventure, that would be off putting.

But the players are taking it seriously. They're not treating it like a joke, but in absolute earnest, to the point of tears.

The original comic got it right. This comic somehow managed to miss the point by a mile.

>This comic somehow managed to miss the point by a mile.

That's because it's making a different point. This isn't hard to get.

It's long, drawn-out, and utterly devoid of humor, even with the insistence that it's supposed to be ironic. Even if it were three panels long it still wouldn't have been particularly amusing.

>But the players are taking it seriously. They're not treating it like a joke, but in absolute earnest, to the point of tears.
So?
Why is something having a connection to sexuality automatically either hidden away and not talked about ever, or the butt of jokes and "brain turned off" dumb shit?

If you actually are playing a game where random weird things happen, (not a gritty realistic serious one) then one of those random weird things being something that is sexual for some people is not an awful thing.

It seems I'm not talking to someone intelligent.
The first comic was a joke about terrible GM's that do dumb things like repeatedly inserting their fetishes into games and thinking they're being clever about them.
This comic is just an unamusing "but they could have had fun anyway!" response that doesn't understand any of the humor in the original.

It doesn't even understand the basics of a comedic foil.

It's just a bad comic, from every perspective.

Whoa, dude, you don't want to paint yourself into a corner now. You're almost at the point where you have to try and defend taking the Piss Forest seriously.

Even the comic couldn't do it without ignoring that it's piss.

The problem appears when inserting your fetishes into a game makes the other players uncomfortable.
Nobody (or at least few) people will take offense to a throwaway line about x medieval city having a brothel or two.
But quite a few people really don't want to hear about the GMs special kingdom of bikini-clad lesbian sexcrazy catgirls.

It's less "talking about sexuality" and more the feeling of "our overweight neckbeard GM who i don't want to think about in that context ever really obviously gets off on this".
Which does not make a comfortable and relaxing gaming environment for most people.

Reminder that nobody on Veeky Forums actually plays games, so any descriptions of interaction with actual people should be entirely disbelieved.

>again
Can I join your group?

>But quite a few people really don't want to hear about the GMs special kingdom of bikini-clad lesbian sexcrazy catgirls.
This i don't understand.
Sure, as i said, if it's a game about gritty realistic medieval times it's one thing, but in a setting with high fantasy weird cultures why couldn't one of them be a matriarchy with scantily clad women.

Why do you care if someone gets off on something?
In the end it just boils down to you being uncomfortable with acknowledging that other people are sexual beings too, because you "don't want to think about them in that way".

This is dumb.

Whereas if you could just not care about it and try to take it lightly and engage with the things in character most likely nothing too awful would come out of it, at least not in the game.
This was the point in the comic which i agree with 100%.

>actually a thing, or is it just some meme

Does it matter?

>? I simply cannot imagine young men describing their fetish in front of other young men

Get out more often.

That guy did a poor job of explaining things, because he made the mistake of thinking you weren't an idiot.

But, since you are an idiot, let me explain.
The comic is dumb. The adventure? Dumb. The characters? Stupid.

You don't understand why, because you are so stupid, that even the simple idea of "a piss forest is stupid" is lost on you. Your personal lack of self-awareness leads you to the idea that not only is it a good idea, but that people who would disagree with it and call it stupid are being too serious and missing out on a chance for a good time.

This is the point where we stop pretending we can have a discussion, because you are clearly too stupid to be reasoned with. You lack the basic comprehension of "Piss Forest is a terrible idea", and that leaves you with dancing around it to try and say that people need to be comfortable when dealing with idiots like yourself, regardless of how stupid you are, because if they just ignore how stupid you are they can have a mediocre and shitty game that's cheapened by your forced insertion of awful ideas just so you can masturbate to them later.

This is the part I call you an idiot that can't be saved, and to tell you to at the very least to develop enough self-awareness to stop making a fool of yourself by opening your mouth.

I wouldn't know, I roleplay with my friends from high school to this day as god intended. No one would risk the scorn and mockery that would follow for the rest of their life if they would try to use our sessions for their own sexual pleasure.

>The comic is dumb. The adventure? Dumb. The characters? Stupid.
>the comic is making a point i don't like
>i refuse to entertain the idea that things could happen that way
>everything in that comic is thus stupid.

Your inability to see how engaging with something (despite the fact that it doesn't seem appealing) can produce nice results, explains your inability to see how engaging with something (despite the fact that it doesn't seem appealing) can produce results.

You don't understand why, because you are so stupid, that even the simple idea of "giving things a chance is good" is lost on you. Your personal lack of self awareness leads you to the idea that not only is it a bad idea, but that people who would disagree with you and call it a good idea are being too stupid to understand and are missing out to have "proper, good" kind of roleplaying experiences.

Seriously. All you said just equates to. "You think something might be fun that i don't think would be fun? I'm going to go ahead and provide no arguments for my standpoint and just insult you for my entire post"

Turn around. Start running. Don't stop until your legs give out. It's your only option to stay relatively innocent.

Please. Go on. Tell me how wonderful the Piss Forest is.

Oh wait, it's fucking retarded.
But do go on about "nice results" like you think that somehow you can just treat piss like water, or that someone who made the concsious effort of devoting an adventure to piss would be even sensible enough to keep it to that level.

First comic had it right. Five steps in, you'd find trolls asking to pee in their mouths, and somehow you're going to argue that makes for a great adventure.

Get bent, you dumb creep. You can take your "b-but it c-could be nice" sentimenality and shove it up your peehole.

>or that someone who made the concsious effort of devoting an adventure to piss would be even sensible enough to keep it to that level.
Why not?
Why do you automatically assume that anything involving something sexual has got to be asinine?
I think this was the point of the comic.
If magical realms are treated sensibly not just "lol here's a fetish thing let me masturbate to it" then it can be good roleplaying as said in >Five steps in,
No you seem to misremember the first comic.
The guys deliberately refused the plothook by the GM after which they got presented with a different one of the same type.
Upon which they physically beat him up, embodying the perfect violent prudish fuckhead stereotype.

>You can take your "b-but it c-could be nice" sentimenality and shove it up your peehole.
That's a fetish you know.

>Please. Go on. Tell me how wonderful the Piss Forest is.
Not him, but that depends on the setting. If the setting's tone is lighthearted and comedic, a piss forest could fit right in purely because of how bizarre it is.

Because it isn't trying to, do you really not understand this?

Burden of proof is kind of on you.

Comic does a poor job of explaining what made the pee adventure good. There's even a panel with the whizzard shooting pee at a pee golem. That doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

All it's got is the two guys crying about how pee can be so compelling, but nothing in any of the panels suggests that. It's basically an adventure that has no reason to include pee, and the comic writer actually seems to have come to the conclusion that they couldn't treat pee like anything other than yellow water without completely destroying the fragile point they were hoping to force.

It's essentially "inserting your fetish can be okay, as long as you do your best to keep your fetish out of context and ultimately make it a neglible point that can be easily and more sensibly replaced with something that isn't awkward/disgusting."

And that's still pretty nonsensical.

You really sound like you need to go outside once in a while. Mostly just so someone can hit you, while they embody the stereotype of "person compelled to violence by someone being an irreconcilable idiot."

>There's even a panel with the whizzard shooting pee at a pee golem
Makes about sense as a barbarian smacking a stone club at a stone golem, which can actually happen in D&D. Or a monk punching a flesh golem.

Please, go back to telling people about how great a piss adventure is, while we watch you make ever increasingly stupid statements.

You're like 95% of all that guy stories rolled up into one person, and all just because you lack basic self-awareness.

The reason why nobody responded to your first post was because it was boring progressive word salad, and most of Veeky Forums is smart enough not to mistake verbosity for wisdom. Please stop bringing your magical realms into games.

You mean shooting fire at a fire elemental or water at a water elemental.

>I simply cannot imagine young men describing their fetish in front of other young men.
Some people are just THAT socially autistic, and some of those people play Veeky Forums. Is it really so hard to realize? How new are you to Veeky Forums?

>why do you think DnD has at least two erotic extensions?

Because sex sells and 3aboos are degenerates?

>burden of proof
the comic is nice you say it's dumb. you prove it.
>Comic does a poor job of explaining what made the pee adventure good.
As i said before, i literally said it all here:

Since you dislike the comic you fail to entertain the things it brings up for long enough to see that each of the panels from the first implies certain virtues necessary for a good RPG.
4th panel: combat and somewhat interesting enemies
5th panel: good party interaction and downtime activities, and a group that gets along.
6th panel: epic conclusion, a point to the storyline, useful abilities
7th panel: humor and a character that's actually roleplaying
8th panel: depth to the character, consequences, humor and tragedy, actual prose, more actual roleplaying

Meanwhile the original comic had
>players not giving a shit about the DMs plothooks
>no actual roleplaying
>not liking some part of the game being resolved with IRL physical violence

>"...a neglible point that can be easily and more sensibly replaced with something that isn't awkward/disgusting."

But it wasn't easily replaceable. It was particularly piss.
It's like making a forest of fire trees. Sure you could have roughly the same effect with normal wood, but the fluff is different and you wouldn't want to touch trees in a piss/fire forest.
Same with enemies, abilities, the availability of piss, the possible motivations of some evil king in a piss kingdom, the "think of me every time you take a piss", thing etc,
It's different. It can of course be overdone, but it adds a different flavor to the campaign.

>"person compelled to violence by someone being an irreconcilable idiot."
I see you like people being beat up for not thinking what you think they should be thinking.
Have you been bullied so much that you internalized it and are projecting?

i had arguments. You had insults.

>word salad
You have done nothing but sling insults without arguments at me.

Sometimes, magical realm happens in a meta-context.

In my campaign, one of our female players is playing the male tank of the group and I'm the male spellcaster. She's maybe genderqueer and almost certainly bi in irl, so the tank turned out to be gay. And is in love with my character. Which is awesome in its own way, because I would love to fuck her senseless irl. I think I'm the only one completely aware of the fact that the reverse of real life is going on in the game right now (someone mad wanting to knock boots with someone who's oblivious to their attraction).

Those are both things that can happen in D&D though. But yeah, you're right.

It's a "it's fine if a woman does it" episode

It only really comes out in the campaign itself as the tank being really protective over the my spellcaster and my spellcaster just thinking that he's his best bro of all time. The tank's also a pally, so he's ultra conflicted about the allure of playing competitive Hide-the-Pickle, so his attraction has helped move his character arc along. Until the revelation that he was gay, the DM was having trouble challenging his oath when he's got an INT of 9 and is basically Superman levels of boy scout when he does realize something isn't kosher.

wut

You straw man?

My brother would absolutely refuse to play Birthright campaigns with his old collage roommate, because they all ended up being way to impregnation fetishy.

>degenerates?
OH. MY. GOD.

This is the most fucking conceited and vacuous insult ever. People saying this unironically, and not just in character for some 40k bullshit makes me weep for this community.
Or are we being invaded by /pol/ or something.

Nothing is intrinsically different if you color the piss blue and call it water.

Also, for a guy trying to defend a stupid comic, you don't really seem to appreciate what "stupid" is, despite embodying it.

Like, you just tried to call diaper-wearing incontinent bears "somewhat interesting enemies."

No. Those are stupid. They might very well be designed to be stupid, but the person who made the comic just isn't really all that good at being absurd and instead just settled for "forest encounter plus diapers" because they might just be as stupid as you are.

And, so far, you've had zero good points, which is why calling you an idiot isn't just warranted, it's neccesary.

Wow, this is the first time I've seen someone sperg out over being called a degenerate.

>tumblr triggered by being called degenerate

Stop being a degenerate if you don't want to be called one. It doesn't take someone from /pol/ to recognize someone so far gone that they've got mental issues.

You're wasting your time, he's probably the 3aboo that's been invading threads for the last few weeks.

>since it involves sharing your fetishes with people who aren't specifically looking for weird sex stuff.
Yet bronies, furries and other weirdos stamp their fetish on as much shit as possible. They even do it IRL.

He's more likely one of the ETBAs, considering how triggered he is.

Meh, most of the people that get called ETBA are people who've called third edition shit.

Besides, everyone knows the only ETBA around Veeky Forums is the 3aboo considering how often he shows up just to sperg out over people not liking his pet game.

>Nothing is intrinsically different if you color the piss blue and call it water.
Everything is. The feeling of the adventure would be different.
People wouldn't be able to conjure water out of nothing while in the desert.
People wouldn't be hesitant to touch the monsters.
The abilities of the wizard would probably not provoke disgust in people.
You generally have more water available than piss outside of the realm of piss.
A king of a piss kingdom would have radically different motivations than the king of the water kingdom.
and these are just things visible in the comic.

There is not a long text explaining why the elements of each picture were enjoyable, because it is a comic not a thesis, but it is implied that they were.

>you're stupid, the comic is stupid
>yet again
great

>Like, you just tried to call diaper-wearing incontinent bears "somewhat interesting enemies."
In fact i did. Because if piss is the weakness of a piss wizard, or something then that is mechanically interesting.
Otherwise it's interesting in fluff, because the enemies fit the theme.
It mixes things up a little. Just because "eeewww it's pee xD" doesn't make this any less valid a point.
>forest encounter with diapers
it's better than "forest encounter with normal bears #63231"

>people unironically using the word degenerate.
Just because someone likes things that you or indeed the majority don't like, doesn't mean you have any right to call them the modern trendy replacement for "sub-human"

I mean you're on Veeky Forums discussing playing pretend games.
You definitely are not to call people out on liking things the majority doesn't.

And no, "not having a weird prudish attitude to anything sexual being mentioned" is not any worse out of the norm than grown men playing pretend.

Oh look, an ETBA.

>He doesn't agree with me
>must be ETBA

You seem adept at missing the point and typing a lot of nonsense.

It's not even worth going through each point to explain how stupid you are. Even just a quick quote makes you look like an idiot not worth talking to.

>forest encounter with diapers
>it's better than "forest encounter with normal bears #63231"

And, we're done.

Nice bait, degenerate, but you're really just too stupid to take seriously anymore.

I'll call you a degenerate when you do creepy/weird/uncouth shit that makes me want to throw up in my mouth user.

If you don't like being called a degenerate, either keep your weird fetishes to yourself like a normal person or take your business elsewhere amongst the rest of your kind.

>im a bitch and eternally triggered

That's why you're ETBA.

No, this is an eternally triggered bitch user.

Can you stop trying to force your shitty meme?

It's already hard enough to have a conversation on this shitty fucking ass board.

So explain to me how weird sentient bears wearing diapers is now worse than yet another repetitive encounter?

I honestly am legitimately curious as to what the hell goes on in your head to make you choose boredom just because the other thing could be sexual for someone.

>I'll call you a degenerate when you do creepy/weird/uncouth shit that makes me want to throw up in my mouth user.
Well in that case i'll call you a degenerate, because your almost victorian prudishness makes me want to fucking kill myself.

>either keep your weird fetishes to yourself like a normal person
>being a prode fuck and purging anything that could be a fetish out of your game is normal

Only in fucking america which was founded by moral prudes.

youtube.com/watch?v=O4p0uw42cdo

the fuck is an etba?

It's an eternally triggered bitch user.

They get triggered when anyone mentions 3rd edition, so they need to bitch about it, and since people will never stop talking about 3rd edition, the will be eternally triggered.

Don't worry about it though. They're just dumb trolls, and all you have to do is call them an ETBA and watch them self-destruct.

>Well in that case i'll call you a degenerate, because your almost victorian prudishness makes me want to fucking kill myself.

Most people don't want to deal with degenerates who get off to diaper shit and piss user.

In fact, I cannot think of a healthy human being who willingly drinks piss or jerks off into a used diaper for sexual gratification.

Can you stop being eternally triggered?
Or, at the very least, stop being a bitch, user?

Wow, was right, Eternally Triggered Bitch user, no doubt about it.

>victorian prudishness
>for thinking bears wearing diapers is dumber than just bears

Long live the Queen then.

I'm pretty sure the comic was just an excuse to make a ton of bad pee jokes.

Do they like 3rd edition or do they hate it?

>i can't stand your sexuality so i don't want to deal with you
please conform more to the prudish american stereotype.

Also the piss forest was just an example used to say that people have literally no reason to be so fucking hostile about others bringing up fetish shit.
How does it hurt you?
What does it matter if someone gets off on it?

>for thinking bears wearing diapers is dumber than just bears
No, for thinking that bears wearing diapers is always worse than just normal bears.

Seriously.
Please tell me what the fuck the harm is in engaging with a setting like that.
Please.

And don't just tell me "because i don't want to". I want to know WHY.

>They get triggered when anyone mentions 3rd edition
>First mention of 3rd edition was in reference to the "erotic" expansions they released for 3rd edition.

Should also be noted, first post in response to "3aboo" being used was some bitch user who got butthurt over being called a degenerate.

But no, keep forcing this shitty meme in the hopes that you make it big on (you)'s.

>Do they like 3rd edition or do they hate it?

Neither. They like being eternally triggered, and with 4e not really being popular anymore, they need something else to complain about.

It's like watching some retarded dog bite its own tail off then get mad at us for it.

>How does it hurt you?

It makes me throw up from the thought of some beluga spanking his vienna sausage to someone shitting in a diaper and eating it.

So I guess if you count malnutrition as "harm," that's one way it hurts me.

>What does it matter if someone gets off on it?

It doesn't, until people like you feel the need to shove your weird fetishes down my throat while expecting me to accept it with open arms, as if you're a fag coming out of the closet.

I couldn't care less what sort of fetishes you enjoy, just don't tell me about it and if you do, don't expect not to be call you a degenerate.

It should be noted that no one really cared about the use of 3aboo, and the person was offended by someone using "degenerate" (with emphasis on their horror at the idea that it can be used unironically), rather than someone calling 3aboo's degenerate.

So, quit being triggered.
Also, lose the bitchiness.

>call them an ETBA and watch them self-destruct.
What the hell is ETBA?

>first post in response to "3aboo" being used was some bitch user who got butthurt over being called a degenerate.
I was the user displeased with the usage of the word "degenerate" and i also have no idea what this whole 3aboo shit is.
presumably people who like 3rd ed?

You have still not provided any actual arguments, just insults.
But sure keep thinking that you're totally the superior nondegenerate intelligent being here.

>from the thought of some beluga spanking his vienna sausage
a) no one is forcing you to think that
b) if someone did that, how does it hurt you?
this is like muslims saying that females should be covered at all times, because seeing such sexual parts like a thigh or an ankle makes them think of all the vile sexual acts they commit with their possibly ugly husbands and that makes them throw up.

Also all fat women should wear bags over their heads, because looking at them makes me imagine them having sex and that's disgusting.

>just don't tell me about it
Why not?
Why are you refusing to accept others fetishes?
What makes your fetishes any less disgusting?

Wouldn't be an example of someone caring about someone using 3aboo though?

I mean, as soon as it was used, the dude started calling him an ETBA, which is almost exactly what that one troll does in every thread he showed up in.

You are literally getting off to ingesting bodily waste and somehow I'm being unreasonable in saying that I don't want to hear about it?

Why do you feel the need to share your sexual preferences so much?

Not really. Guy doesn't even call the guy who uses 3aboo an ETBA, but the guy that guy was calling a 3aboo.

Also, if you don't want to be called an ETBA, you shouldn't be so obviously an eternally triggered bitch. user, you might want to think about not being a troll before you call other people them.

I'm just the peanut gallery, and rather than examining your argument, let's examine your behavior in this thread, as that's what this is really about. I couldn't give a Rat's Ass about who's right in this argument, nor do I care to. What's happening is that every small remark, every snide comment, and every statement against your cause sends you on a tirade of posts, all of which can be read as angry stupidity rather than actual cases in an arguments. Who gives a fuck what you're fighting over, you're angry, easily triggered, and fun to watch.

>Why do you feel the need to share your sexual preferences so much?
That's not what we're talking about.

The comic wasn't about masturbating to piss.
The comic was about making an adventure around a concept that is ALSO for some people a fetish.

I mean if i have tiles in a dungeon now am i an asshole, because some guy gets off to it?

The fact that someone gets off to something doesn't make that something inherently bad, and you're being unreasonable to hate it, unless a sexual act itself is described in vivid detail, but even then you could simply choose to ignore it.

>The comic was about making an adventure around a concept that is ALSO for some people a fetish.

You mean a comic about making an adventure around piss.

How the fuck are people even still trying to defend that.

The only people I've seen using ETBA unironically was people who have made it their duty to derail threads JUST because someone ITT mentioned how they didn't like some aspect of 3rd edition.

I'm honestly more mad about you forcing the ETBA meme than I am about anything else, and it's mainly because I can see it being used to describe "people I don't like/don't agree with me" and making it even harder to have a decent discussion on this board simply because of how easy it can derail threads.

Anyways, I've wasted enough time with this.

>every small remark, every snide comment, and every statement against your cause sends you on a tirade of posts
That's generally how i am.
I once argued with a troll for 9 hours straight, until he stopped because of exhaustion.

I, contrary to others in this thread take every remark seriously and assume the other person has some reason for it, and don't just dismiss people as stupid, so naturally i try to argue against every small thing.

And no i actually did have arguments.

>How the fuck are people even still trying to defend that.
How the fuck are people even still trying to argue against that

Look if you present no arguments, you're not going to get anywhere.
I clearly won't just back down and say something like "yeah.. actually now that i think about it... piss? sexual fetishes possibly? eewwwww disgusting... it's wrong to bring it into a nice game of bloody murder and necromancy"

You see it as inherently awful without any actual reason, and i don't see it as inherently awful.
Just reminding me of the subject matter and presenting it as absurd won't win the argument, precisely because i don't think it to be absurd.

>The comic was about making an adventure around a concept that is ALSO for some people a fetish.

Y'mean a comic that's based around one degenerate who tried to base an entire adventure around piss, pissing, and drinking piss?

Tell me something, why do you feel the need to broadcast your sexual preferences into your campaigns, without your player's consent?

>Tell me something, why do you feel the need to broadcast your sexual preferences into your campaigns, without your player's consent?
I don't feel the need to do so.
My first post ITT was how i would love to be in a campaign like that, because i think exploring a concept i don't usually explore because it's not my fetish would be interesting and fun for a roleplaying game that is not too gritty serious.

>I, contrary to others in this thread take every remark seriously and assume the other person has some reason for it.

>On Veeky Forums

Well, found your fucking problem!

>I once argued with a troll for 9 hours straight, until he stopped because of exhaustion.

That's not something to be proud of mate.

>You see it as inherently awful without any actual reason

No, I find it inherently awful because it's gross and it makes me uncomfortable because a) drinking piss isn't healthy and b) I now know that you whack off to someone doing it.