Did Monkey Skeleton get BTFO by IOTA Founder??
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
twitter.com
IOTA AKBARRRRRRRR
>SMART REFUGEE CITIES
are there smart refugees?
doesn't even know definition of refugee, they are meant to leave again
>Monkey Skeleton
>phone posting
>building permanent internet-of-things little Africas throughout Europe
this might be the most reddit thing I've ever read in my life
anyone who still has IOTA needs to sell immediately
...
> Did Monkey Skeleton get BTFO by IOTA Founder??
Are you reading the same OP pic as me? I see precisely the opposite.
Vitalik is right though. I bet you don't even understand the "discussion".
Won't this attract rich neo libs and globalists, thus increasing the price? Why would you guys sell it, seems like a cash cow
Former ETH holder here- it's fucking hilarious watching this malnourished Russian crash and burn. But in all seriousness, we can't let this guy get efficient smart contracts.
So we’re watching two guys fight over which one of their shitcoin monopoly internet money is better?
Am I getting that right?
read the tweets not the pic...
This is why I'm never touching IOTA. Fuck that cuck douche bag.
they are both fucking geniuses, why does everyone have to defend their shitty crypto like football teams and drag down other projects
is he r-right? vitalik seems scared of him
Vitalik is 100% right. So many people in CS are so bad at security...
I don't understand this debate but I'm gonna side with Vitalik just because he's way too autistic to be wrong
I like IOTA, but they toot their own horn so much that it seems they know that they don't have a decent product that speaks for itself.
>they are both fucking geniuses
this is wrong though
Yup Vitalik seemed like he got served but who knows that was like the worst fight ever, why ? Because no one knows if either one is right lmao
Lmao vitalik got destroyed.
> no one knows if either one is right lmao
Speak for yourself, brainlet.
The discussion wasn't very in-depth.
Sonstebo basically admitted that any hacker could spoof any devices locally (for example, set up your spoofing device to steal IOTA at a road toll point, or worse) but that "it doesn't matter because IOTA wouldn't be globally compromised" by an EM spectrum attack.
The basis of their "refutation" of the claim that you could network attack globally in the first place was based on the idea that you couldn't EM spectrum attack, so all their arguments were torn to shreds.
Sonstebo tries to marginalize the vulnerability for local EM attacks by reasserting a claim about global invulnerability that relied on there not being such a vulnerability to begin with (at least as far as the IOTA side argued).
Sonstebo isn't a genius. He's just "good" at being a shady marketer and hyper. Vitalik has his flaws but he's an actual newton/riemann tier genius and will be remembered as such.
>he's an actual newton/riemann tier genius and will be remembered as such
stopped reading there
but thats the last sentence
...
The IOTA fag's pink wojaks will be so ssevere when IOTA's flaws prove unacceptable in real world usage and it's top 5 market cap too. So many gona get hurt. Serves em.
He didn't read the period.
/pol/ here, what the flying fuck did I just read?
>REEEEEEing at refugees
>{{{white genocide}}}
>implying most of the crypto community is /pol/-tier dumb
kek
LMFAOOOO
Anyone with a fucking brain would understand the opposite happened.
Thread full of brainlets
He's a commie the tangle is a commie peer to peer