>>5034230

Gonna start with $1000 and i like stellar so much I'm thinking about making it 50% of the portfolio. Its like the new link.

discord.gg/bF9Fbez

Congraz dude, smart money.

x5 would be an INSANE market cap. If it did anywhere near that the coin would still be worth less than 50 cents

If it beat BTC market cap itd still be worth less than 10usd

just not a good investment or opportunity for x100 etc unless you got in real early

if you spent $300 usd on REQ and XLM right now and both hit 15B market cap
Your XLM would be worth like 900 bucks
Your REQ would be worth like 23,000 bucks

also I suck at math good luck

New to investing just bought a little under 600 of them... Pls xlm bby be my ticket to easy street

>INSANE market cap
>between IOTA and Litecoin
>way after Ripple, to which it is superior
What are you talking about?

>If it beat BTC market cap itd still be worth less than 10usd
It would be 100 $. Did you fail calculus or what?

>x5 would be an INSANE market cap.

No it wouldn't? x5 from here would put it just between IOTA and LTC, not remotely "insane" for a project like XLM.

IOTA pumped higher than that simply on the PREMISE of a microsoft partnership. XLM has actual partnerhsips and a working product, it is miles ahead of anything in the top 10 right now.

Fuck me for having a mini-stroke just as I shit-talked you. Meant to say 100 x.

lol do you understand supply?

Not sure about him but you clearly don't understand supply based on your previous statement of

>market cap and supply kills my dreams though

Market cap sure. Supply is utterly irrelevant, or XRP wouldn't have hovered around the top 5 for the past few years.

You could actually argue that high supply is a benefit, because ignorant normies will be inclined to see it as "cheap".

That only matters if they dump more of it in the market suddenly. Aren't they holding the majority of it to slowly inflate it 1 % a year? The supply doesn't matter, the price it's settled at considering the current market cap matters

It's simple dude. 300B market cap (higher than BTC) with a supply of 103,511,312,336

can you do that math for me? divide those two numbers? let me know what you get

even use the current circulating supply to give yourself a big advantage: 17,851,921,404

wow Veeky Forums never fails to deliver retardation

the price per is literally defined by the market cap and supply

there is no "it doesn't matter"

holy fuck pls

Hmm let's see then

cap $2,722,684,344
price $0.152515
supply 17,851,911,904 XLM

supply * price = 2.7b = cap

So the price does match and there are no looming whale dumps to roll into the market.

And what exactly is your problem here?

Ok, 300B market cap would be a roughly 100x increase if the supply remained the same, each XLM would be worth somewhere in the region of $15. I don't really see the point you're trying to make here though.

>>If it beat BTC market cap itd still be worth less than 10usd
>It would be 100 $. Did you fail calculus or what?
Uh, the guy claiming $100/XLM?
Did you even read anything?
My math is right, I'm right, my point is that the cost of each XLM is limited by supply. This doesn't reduce your % gains, but it does limit the lambo opportunities if you're a small amount investor.

>>It would be 100 $. Did you fail calculus or what?

Yeah the thing is, I never said that. I simply pointed out that your assertion that XLM supply will limit it's growth is retarded and goes against observable evidence.

>This doesn't reduce your % gains, but it does limit the lambo opportunities if you're a small amount investor.

No it doesn't it makes literally no difference you complete brainlet. How can it limit you if the % gains are the same?

What the fuck are you on about? You yourself claimed that BTC-level marketcap would be 10 $, I said it would be 100 x, that's 15 not 10 $.

> cost of each XLM is limited by supply
Doesn't that apply to all coins? Why are you whining about it here?

> This doesn't reduce your % gains, but it does limit the lambo opportunities if you're a small amount investor.
Well no shit. If it costs less, you buy more of them, brainlet. The supply doesn't limit anything.

XLM trading at $500 a lumen when lads?????

What part of XLM can't go 100x don't you understand? With its supply it would require basically TOO MANY BILLIONS of USD to give you very high returns. When there's a money flow, you spread the money flow to the amount of stuff there is.

Too many coins -> less effective money is in increasing its price

the absolute state of biz

Not very likely considering how many are in circulation.

>What part of XLM can't go 100x don't you understand?

>Too many coins -> less effective money is in increasing its price

Provide some evidence for this claim.

Remember, even low supply coins like BTC are divisible down to the hundred millionth. Whole BTC trades are much rarer than satoshi trades.

lmao little soyboy didn't even try to respond.

The only difference supply makes is where you put the decimal point while trading.

tfw lumen can't 100x

I don' give a fuck if it goes x100, I'll sell at x5, which it will undoubtedly hit unless the whole market implodes.

lmao I understand what you are thinking bro. Problem is, you are assuming the price of the two coins to be the same. But the price of a coin with much larger supply is much smaller. I keep hearing this stupid shit on biz so I'll type this for you:
Total mcap for coin A = Total mcap for coin B = $100 (say)
total supply coin A = 10; Total supply for coin B = 1000
Price coin A = $100/10 = $10
Price coin B = $100/1000 = $0.10

When the mcap doubles:

Price coin A = $200/10 = $20 = 100% increase
Price coin B = $200/1000 = $0.20 = 100% increase

So basically what said

Proof?

Mate, I do give a fuck. I want this to be the new world currency. Everything would be so much fucking better. This is what I was promised with bitcoin years back, except now I can have it.

I'm holding until I can buy bananas from the store with it.

>buying bananas from the store

maybe you guys saw my dumb thread a couple hours ago about how i lost my xlm transaction. well i should get it but bittrex could take a week or even a month to do it. im glad that im in a coin that's very stable at least and i dont worry at all that it will tank while I cant do anything about it

Where should I buy them ;_;

Ok do the math, $300 into XLM and REQ right now.

Tell me what % each one gets if they both hit 100B market cap.

the supply is literally, mathematically, limiting

do the math, $300 into XLM and REQ right now.

Tell me what % each one gets if they both hit 100B market cap

get back to me bby girl

>not knowing where to buy them

Yes REQ would give you a bigger gain if it hit 100B market cap but that has nothing to do with the supply, it's due to REQ currently having a lower market cap you single digit IQ mongloid.

ANSWER ME

You said XLM can't 100 x, pajeet. The supply has nothing to do with that since the market cap matches the supply.

>Tell me what % each one gets if they both hit 100B market cap.
If XLM grows 100 % it gets 100 % the price. If REQ grows 100 % it gets 100 % the price. This has nothing to do with supply. Obviously REQ has a higher potential theoretical potential for growth assuming static max market cap, but that's because it has a lower market cap than XLM, not because its supply is somehow different from XLM. Do I really have to spell this out for you?

that's my fucking point you god damn brain dead retard can you read?

scroll up u autist piece of shit

enjoy staying poor

lol an equal increase in mcap would give equal gains. if they both increase by 100B, they will provide equal gains. if one gains 50B and other gains 100B, the 100B will give you double gains.

How old are you?

im so glad dumb investors like you are around to help fill my bags

lmao are you actually denying you said

>the supply is literally, mathematically, limiting

This is objectively wrong, and that's what I was responding to. You're not only retarded, you're a fucking coward.

that's not an equal increase in mcap considering the coins HAVE DIFFERENT MARKET CAPS RIGHT NOW

holy fuck the younger i am the more embarassed you should be so im not sure you want to ask that question

>lol do you understand supply?

It has nothing to do with supply, brainlet. I'm sorry about your disability.

That is not objectively wrong, but i'll let you keep believing dumb shit like that because I need idiots like you to buy and sell shit coins to help my gains

Brainlet please go.

ypou are right in this specific instance
youare right in this specific instance

Can i have 10k of those? Plz

I have a buyorder at 780. How optimistic am i

Holy fuck you are easily the most dishonest, sniveling little brainlet I've encountered on Veeky Forums and that's saying something.

NO ONE disagreed with you that a lower market cap means higher room for growth. The disagreement was over your claim that high supply limits growth which you have not once attempted to back up, and now you're attempting to trumpet an imaginary victory about market cap when no one even disagreed with you about this. Kill yourself you pathetic cunt.

lmao stay mad kid

lol nice admission of defeat kid. Come back when you can actually string a coherent thought together ;-)

...

Nah dude. Only if they had the exact same MC now. If a 1B MC coin increases 100B it gains a lot more than a 1000B MC coin increasing 100B.

admission of defeat?

if you don't factor in supply and market cap when buying coins i can't help you - can't explain it any more.

good luck out there son

>OH SHIT THIS COIN IS ONLY 10 CENTS IM OFF TO THE MOON WHEN IT GOES TO 50

I do factor in market cap. I don't factor in supply.

If you can explain to me why I should, I'll be more than happy to take your advice.

...

anyways, go long!

blog.coinfund.io/cryptoeconomics-is-hard-market-cap-4833c378a3e0

i'm not your teacher son, DYOR

bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/comparing-digital-currencies-market-cap-doesn-t-tell-the-whole-story-1482418052/

"Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pidgeon. It'll just knock over all the pieces, shit on the board, and strut about like it's won anyway."

We already established that XLM is almost 100 % in circulation. Stop moving the goalposts, everybody knows you're a retard by now and that's it.

>blog.coinfund.io/cryptoeconomics-is-hard-market-cap-4833c378a3e0

That article is about market cap, over which we have no disagreement.

Why can't you just admit you were wrong about supply limiting growth? Why can't you admit that you just meant market cap? What's going on in that tiny little brain of yours?

That article says market cap doesn't matter.

>didnt even read the article, stuck in a retard echo chamber

For example, it would be pointless to compare the market cap of one currency with the market cap of another (without regard to all these other factors) and on that basis alone make conclusions about the relative value of their networks.

>thinks total supply of 103billion is relevant today

CIRCULATING SUPPLY IS WHAT MATTERS U KEKS. they need a massive total supply because of future demand.

agree, but when predicting future prices, it can help to look at the total supply

Ok, so you're accusing me of being in an echo chamber when your post is a direct copy paste of a line from an article that doesn't even back up your hypothesis in any way shape of form

Come back when you are willing to back up your argument that a high supply is intrinsically limiting. Otherwise you're just wasting our time. Come on little boy, explain to me how

>For example, it would be pointless to compare the market cap of one currency with the market cap of another (without regard to all these other factors) and on that basis alone make conclusions about the relative value of their networks.

translates to

>>the supply is literally, mathematically, limiting

Like Ripple?

>I do factor in market cap. I don't factor in supply.

LOL brainlet, enjoy being dumb forever

There's nothing negative about xlm supply. As mentioned, it's all in circulation by now. What's wrong with you?

high supply just means that people buy more... I'm in awe of how hard that is for you to realize.

Yep, another deflecting reply that doesn't even pretend to address my post. You're not even trying to argue anymore. It's a little bit sad that you don't have the dignity to just admit defeat, or walk away entirely.

I tried to help you educate yourself, you waived off an entire article explaining why looking at only MCAP is dumb

but hey, you do you.

Wowzers this is a retarded thread. What worries me about stellar is that there is a total of 100bil coins which arnt released yet.

>why looking at only MCAP is dumb

Oh cool, did I disagree with that? No, I simply asked you to back up your very specific assertion that a high supply is limiting. You have so far failed to do this and resorted to pathetic deflection tactics like linking to long winded articles unrelated to your point.

what a stupid thread, i regret having read it all. no one cares about market caps or circulating supplies or what the fuck ever. is the price going up or down, is all i give 2 shits about.

>thinks article is unrelated
>says article is unrelated
>either can't read or didn't read
>is dumb

>it's all in circulation by now
source?

Well you've already quoted the article, and the quote was totally unrelated to your point.

It's really, really simple, if there's something in the article that backs up your assertion, you'd point it out You haven't though, because you know there isn't. But because you're a coward, you can't just admit it.

you could read it for yourself
you want me to get you a tissue and hold your hand as well?

I remember reading that somewhere but am unable to find an answer now. The price matches all coins being in circulation, though.

They need to actually publicize their news instead of letting people know literally nothing of what is happening at these conferences

I have read it, and there's nothing in it about supply limiting growth. You know this, so why do you keep claiming otherwise? I honestly don't get it, what are you trying to achieve?

o no, its retarded

they're definitly working on their marketing right now. there's a thread on the subreddit with the new marketing-teamleader

>maybe if I keep flinging insults I'll stop being objectively wrong!

lmao

maybe if i can't comprehend simple math and english i'll think i win every argument i get in