Why did the request network holders allow REQ to rise infinitely but the chainlink holders don't let it move five cents...

I don't get it

Because link is a shitty project, outside of biz you never even hear about it.

Its only here that it has this weird autistic cult following

Thank you. I greatly appreciate it.

SWIFT Alliance Connect, and the secure Alliance Lite2 USB token provided by SWIFT

Reminds me of eth circa 1 year ago

Spread the word, you are correct.

>a shitty project
>moving information to and from blockchains in a trustless way is a shitty project
>why am I even in crypto

What is happening here? Are you seriously getting your panties in a twist because of a USB?

Not really wadded up. Just sharing news to encourage hope. People can intrepret this how ever they choose.

How would one interpret it? All I'm getting is that Chainlink did a PoC with Swift which we knew already.

What are you getting from it?

Maybe because nobody knows what going on at Smartcontract?

That chainlink is the backend support to intigrate all systems onto alliance. Which fits in line with getting all banks up to ISO 20022 by spring, which the alliance platform should accomplish.

This is basically conspiracy theory. AllianceLite has been around forever and even the diagram shows Link is just a service offered on it.

well, for me, I sold because of those retards misinterpreting SWIFT's tweet. It would be bad if the pump was indeed because of the tweet, so I de-risked. Blade those idiots

>blade
blame, though I wouldn't mind blading them

Alliance lite 2, is cloud based.

As are most services these days. The diagram still shows it as a service that is available on it.

Look I'm not saying Chainlink won't be a service on it that banks will be able to access easily via AllianceLite but Chainlink isn't the backend support to integrate everying because that doesn't make any sense for what Link is.

Where in the world is Sergey Sandiego?

What do you guys think about LINKPool? I'm pretty hype.

medium.com/@jonnyhuxtable/linkpool-the-first-network-of-chainlink-nodes-backed-by-a-smart-contract-9dc34593c4d

agree, i got greedy and chose not to sell at 34 cents thinking that it would pump a little more on dumbasses misreading the tweet. that tweet is the ONLY reason this pumped. ended up selling @ 30 cents, will buy back in with this inevitably drops back to 20-23c. feelsbadman

If nothing else it tells you how closely people are watching Link and how quickly and hard it will pump with news.

It went up 10 cents on people misinterpreting a tweet that clearly had nothing to do with Link. Any actual news will send it into orbit.

>It won't stop dumping

I'd see it as a way to help bring offchain data(old alliant data) into the new blockchain enviroment. Section 2, first paragraph of the white paper. You bring up some very good questions.

this, or it says how many bagholders there are ready to exit when they break even or just take a smaller loss

There are some amazing mental gymnastics and large leaps of logic itt

Newfags like you that want to make it yesterday are not going to make it tomorrow.

Be patient fuckstick.