(3.5e_Feat)

dandwiki.com/wiki/Vore_(3.5e_Feat)

Why? Just fucking why? What DM would allow this shit? I was looking through the 3.5e wiki to see if there was some genuinely good feats I could use, and then I found this! Please tell me that there is nothing like this for 5e.

Other urls found in this thread:

dandwiki.com/wiki/Vore_(3.5e_Feat)
d20pfsrd.com/classes/base-classes/witch/archetypes/paizo---witch-archetypes/gingerbread-witch-witch-archetype
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

At least it isn't Pathfinder...

...

>Dandwiki has shitty homebrew
Wow what a shocker somebody alert the press

In all actuality that particular wiki is one of the shittiest sources of homebrew content on the internet, and it's made doubly shitty by the fact they're not great at labeling what's homebrew and what isn't.

To make this clear: "Vore" is not official 3.5 content. It's someone's shitty fetish homebrew that's masquerading as a real D&D feat because of bad labeling. If you use DanDwiki, get used to seeing a lot of really shitty homebrew. If you aren't looking for shitty homebrew, hop on over to the file share thread and download the PDFs of all the 3.5 content, or at least find a more reliable online source (I haven't played 3.5 in ages and all the stuff I used to use has been shut down by now afaik).

Have some more.

That's why dandwiki is shit, it's full of a bunch of awful internet homebrew that anyone can make. At least it isn't...

>dandwiki.com/wiki/Vore_(3.5e_Feat)
Its homebrew content
Its for some weirdos games
Its not for you to worry about
Its not for us to care

Oh no! So creepy! How depraved!

It's my fetish, tho...

...

>2 medium creatures
you what?

>going to dandy
>ever
For what purpose?

Mine too, but it still feels weird to see it. Even weirder when it's official content. Have you seen the Gingerbread Witch archetype in Horror Adventures?

Notice if you follow the line of page directions at the bottom, it plain out says they are homebrew feats.

Just about everything not directly stolen from open licences on dandy is homebrew.

Problem?

I wasn't talking about OP's post, I was talking about the archetype in Horror Adventures. Specifically -
d20pfsrd.com/classes/base-classes/witch/archetypes/paizo---witch-archetypes/gingerbread-witch-witch-archetype
What the fuck, Paizo?

...

This clearly isn't from a published paizo product

I have seen much worse out of CoC adventures.

The toad monster who used to rape his family, make star spawn children and eat the ones too mutated to survive and turns them into mummified pellets beats this by miles.

>Like a panda who can only eat eucalyptus leaves

...

That completely slipped by me until I read the filename.

I mean, witch that eats children is a pretty common fairy tale trope.

Who is drawing these and where can I find them?

Also you can play a literal Mary Sue with the same supplement.

It was the supplement of the month in Paizo's web magazine the month when it came out.

Is this acceptable?

>make riddle have more than one answer, but only one acceptable one
>player who guesses one gets a hefty WIS bonus to roll, but still has to roll for it

Huh.

Shiniez on dA would be a good place to start your search. Don't get your hopes up for more FF content though, he's doing mostly capeshit and lesbian BDSM.

To be honest I was really happy to see a gingerbread witch archetype until I got to those last two skills. What the fuck, why not something about building gingerbread golems or poisoning existing candy? Did a team of writers actually agree on this or did an autistic night janitor slip it in?