Was he really the villain after all?

Was he really the villain after all?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=R_FQU4KzN7A
youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

No.

You're a fucking idiot if you think the Potion Seller was in the right to not give him the potion.

He was warned. He knew what he wanted. He heard the risks. He was a sane man. Now he's a dead man, because he had to settle for a cut rate potion, or even no potion at all.

The potion seller's arrogance killed the knight and left him without money in his pocket. He's not only wrong, but he is ALSO a fucking idiot.

Eat shit and die.

What is villanous about wanting only the steongest potions?

But they could kill a dragon.

How would a man fare in a battle without only the strongest potions?

Could. How does the potion seller know?

Has he tried? If he has, how does he know it will kill the knight, or even a housecat? Has he killed people with his strongest potion before?

If he has, how can he even pretend to have the moral high ground?

The Potion Seller should drink his own potion.

Perhaps the seller tasted his potions and knew they were of the strongest and not for the weakest, so he was attempting to save the Traveller from his strongest potions, since they could kill a dragon let alone a man?

But why would you open a potion shop if your potions are lethal even for magical megafauna?
Why not call it, Dragon and Pest Control Shop?

Perhaps he was intending to sell them to other sellers, and not knights considering his potions could do everything they could and more.