Then I hereby raid this thread in the names of space piracy, debauchery, and general blackshieldery!
Joseph Smith
>Need warp charge to trigger gun of its suit.
wot
Austin Hughes
What the zog?
Daniel Sanders
Xeno loving bitch aint my sister.
Nathan Rogers
Tzeentch tech man. also, wow, the autism.
Dylan Morales
...
Cooper Martinez
nofunallowed.jpg
Jonathan Brooks
Or, using old fluff, where it says that some MkV were made using MkIV armour materials and cabling, resulting in no external cables on limbs and no need for extra plates (no studs). Some even used MkIV helmets, when available. So get some X-cable torsos from bits stores and, make your MkVIIs with them and put spare MkIV helmets on them. Or maybe use the SW torsos on them and use them as assault or despoiler squads.
Brayden Kelly
It's going to be a pretty even spread of FW Legion MkV, SW box, and the BaC MkIV. I am going to keep the SW specific parts (mainly the legs and torso's) for Sgt's, as 'artificer armor' but other than that it is supposed to look like beat MkV (using that old fluff)
Dylan Reed
How long until these start getting good again?
Parker Sanders
Ugh
Daniel Watson
They were good?
Jordan Foster
How about you make a good one next time?
Kevin Thomas
You know, maybe I should someday share the Primach's Daughters version of this I did years ago. It can't be worse than this.
Colton Morris
How long until people stop complaining for no good reason?
Jayden Cox
Don't get me wrong, it's neat, but it must of taken some serious autism to put that together.
Wyatt Young
Once Inferno comes out. Yes. Once upon a time(read after Book 6 and way before we got bothered by the wait for Inferno) these threads were great.
Wyatt Sanchez
Probably when Inferno comes out
so never
Kevin Robinson
Or just have skills in photoshop. I made one for a bunch of RG units and characters. And the Destroyer fix. Not very difficult.
Gabriel Jenkins
I am not responsible for the shitposters who infest these threads.
Wyatt Smith
What would you like to see in a Rite of War, for all legions or whichever you like?
Anthony Robinson
>shitposters >implying you are not the shitposters
Angel Ward
Please, stop before its too late!
Luis Hall
I've posted shit before, though none of it was my shit.
All this general has become is a place for autism over armour, weapons and Legions, Primarchfuing, posting semi-well-painted models and bitching over lists. Plus memes. All the fucking memes. It's like an inoperable cancer at this point. This was never what I was hoping for when a Horus heresy General began.
Eli Reed
I want a generic Destroyer Corps with all sorts of F O R B I D D E N W E A P O N S that can destroy objectives.
Then for RG I want them to redo Liberation Force and make it not absolutely unbelievably terrible crunch wise.
Then add a XIX Predation Fleet RoW. What I'm imagining is pretty close to Blackshield Outlanders so I'm less jazzed about this as I was pre book 6.
David Adams
Stop!
Aiden Johnson
Well, my superglue bottle has glued the cap on, the test model I had planned won't pan out yet but I should have one before the end of the thread.
Lincoln Wood
ok, the part about Malcador objecting her destruction is cute.
Mason Torres
a legion and mechanicum joint Rite could be cool
Oliver Wright
If there was ever a Female Primarch or Daughter Primarch Project, he'd be the one helming it.
Jaxson Anderson
Whoah man, don't lose your head of this.
Dominic Wood
I want a rite that has heavy support as optional troops and does something to boost cover's usefulness. Preferably it would be good in both attack and defense (with some restrictions, obviously), but if they wanted to make it "the super-fort rite" that wouldn't be so bad.
Nathaniel Williams
1 question;
Armoured Spearhead.
The rite says I can have Command tank who can be warlord and get master of legion for unlocking Rite of War.
Battlescribe and 1d4chan says I must have master of legion character for unlocking rite of war.
Is battlescribe and 1d4chan wrong and Stupid and Am I stupid for asking question, or is only I stupid for missing something in rules?
Anthony Fisher
Maybe a rite that not only makes generic destroyers troops but also makes the legion specific destroyer alternatives (pyroclasts, grave wardens, ashen circle) troops too?
Angel Gutierrez
battlescribe and 1d4chan don't trump the rulebook... they are often outdated. so no. you dont need an extra charecter with motl
Elijah Robinson
That's a nice idea.
Gavin Evans
>one of either can be taken as a HQ (gaining Super-heavy Command Tank and +1 BS as it's Warlord trait and counts as having Master of the Legion for this RoW only) Now why would you go on the internet and tell lies?
Ian Ross
>(like lone HQ choices, you'll still need a non-tank HQ to get the MotL rule) Oh. Well, that's being edited out.
Jaxson Sanders
>people actually think Inferno coming out will solve all their problems and MHHGGA
Joseph Brown
Something like
>Imperial Fist Last Wall RoW -Tactical/Breacher Squads may buy an Imperial Bastion or Bunker instead of a dedicated transport -Any unit may make a disordered charge when deploying out of an escape hatch -Must have a Fortification and a third compulsory unit -Assault Squads are not compulsory troops for this RoW
>Imperial Fist Brothers of the Temple -Templar Brethren are compulsory troops and must be taken as such -Oath bound: Must choose one oath to complete at the end of the game, failure to do so will make you unable to win the game i)Conquer All: Choose an objective in your oponents deployment zone, must be scoring that objective at the end of the game ii)Glory to the VIIth: Must kill at least 3 enemy characters iii)To the Last!: Choose an objective in your deployment zone, your enemy cannot be scoring that objective at the end of the game Blaze of Glory: Templar Brethren gain Fleet when charging an enemy that has been hit by barrage weapons -Sigismund must be the warlord and only Legion Champions may be taken as consuls. -No Allies
Anthony Evans
yeah, and maybe the ability to swap frag and krak missiles for rad missiles for any missile launcher in the detatchment. down side is that there must be more infantry than vehicles (not counting dedicated transports) in the list
Blake Ramirez
Hi guys,
I have an mk4 helmet with terminator honours. Do I have to take it away to use it in 30k?
Thanks in advance
Daniel Martinez
When Phantom Pain posting comes back and the new novels have lulzy resolutions.
Joshua Davis
That is a great Pic. When Inferno comes out that has to the the OP Pic.
Justin Brooks
>Sigismund must be the warlord Or Dorn.
David Fisher
Would an X Legion breacher legionary have a chance at fighting alongside some IV Legion legionaries?
Camden Barnes
So how long after Inferno comes out will we have to wait for Scans?
Aiden Price
What? terminator honors are on shoulders not helmets. its the Crux Terminatus
Noah Miller
Forever.
Jackson Evans
The crux comes in many forms, not just shoulder mounted. I think one of the Sternguard helmets is a MkIV with a crux on the forehead.
Charles Thompson
>may buy an Imperial Bastion or Bunker instead of a dedicated transport Never knew I needed this. Holy moly! Extend it to all non-jump non-terminator infantry (of 10 or more?) and it's great. Make heavy support squads optional troops too. Probably a limit on fast-attack as well, I imagine. And some generic bonuses as well, perhaps boosting buildings and letting rapid-fire weapons inside buildings rapid-fire at 3/4 range instead of half range.
Can you show a picture of which one it is from a site like Bitzbox?
If you're Imperial Fists I'd personally say it's almost always fine because muh crosses and them being the ones who accompanied the Emperor to the final battle.
Jordan Richardson
I'm equally excited and terrified, it's weird to finally get rules and a nice FW treatment (as a long, loooonnngtime TS fan) but as the forever losers, I expect lots of things I like being made fun of and muh fragile feelings
not really, the only thing I'm dreading is if there's some bullshit in there that triggers autists
Hunter Kelly
Don't worry, I fully expect TS to get nerfed because no one else has psykers.
I have high hopes for FW magnus however.
Isaac Davis
>some bullshit in there that triggers autists There's nothing that isn't this.
Grayson Bennett
Armoured Breakthrough != Armoured Spearhead
Jose Price
When FW gives us the truth of the Space Wolves and the Emperor's Executioners, there's going to be a torrent of Butthurt. Either from Wolvesfags or Antiwolvesfags.
Vanguard, actually. This one up right, and it's for an IW.
Benjamin Hall
>Plus memes. All the fucking memes. If you know the path, show it to us. Please don't say "lore". BL is the memiest of them all.
Mason Adams
You forget Word Bearers who have Psyker Praetors, Centurions, Diabolists, and Chaplains.
Joshua Myers
Honestly? They already did Armoured Breakthrough, so I can bliztkrieg to my heart's content. It's such a weird outlier for a generic RoW, too, in that it fundamentally changes your force disposition rather radically and lets you build an entire army that doesn't have a single infantry model in it if you really want to go all out with it. I'm surprised they did anything that wild, much less something available to (almost) any legion.
Like, vehicles never being scoring units, even if they're a dedicated transport, is a BIG part of HH games and missions, and then they let you take Predators as troops that can score while being fast for basically no point tax? Shit is nuts, man.
I don't think I could have even wishlisted a RoW as good as Armoured Breakthrough has ended up being, especially now that the Master of Armour counts as your Master of the Legion so you don't even have to take the old Praetor/Primarch + Transport tax you did before the red book update. The only debatable thing I'd like to do that I'm not sure you can do is to take pintle-mounted heavy bolters on the troop Predators (since they're only 10 points per upgrade and the tanks are fast)... but given how expensive that is to buy without recasting I'm okay with not doing that.
Brayden Lee
I feel the bigger issue is you're considering using the terrible anteater variant of the mk IV helmet.
Dylan Ramirez
So, you want The Reaping ;^)? I'd fix the ones we have before proposing new ones.
Adrian Walker
Even the lore's gone to fucking shit, so that's no option.
What were Horus heresy threads like before the General? They were mostly just discussion. Not just lore, but models and armies. A lot of your dudes stuff (which I rarely if ever see here) and ideas for armies. And campaign ideas, ideas for warzones, sectors and linked games to decide the fate of dozens of worlds.
I think we need more of the wonder and openness of those early days, and not the weary, stodgy self-ironic shitposting we have these days.
Connor Long
I personally don't like it and don't feel like it looks very IW, but at the end of the day they are "your dudes", and it's Mark 4 so anything can happen.
Caleb Martinez
I forgot Vanguard had MkIV as well. Confused it with regular AssMarines.
I used the Sternguard MkIV helmet with optics on my support squad.
Lincoln Richardson
A rite of war that represents this method of conducting war.
Henry Martin
Yes. Why wouldn't he? Say it was a Mechanicum muster, they are both sworn brothers to the Mechanicus
Blake Wood
...
Lincoln Reyes
Thread began to slide when anyone tabletop standard and below started getting shat on when they post pics and most Your Dudes write ups got holes picked in and autisted to death.
Rosterposting still seems helpful in the main, however. Some people just shit on them, but most comments seem positive crits (even if they turn out to be shit advice in practice).
Leo Walker
XIth thread for the XIth!
Asher Rogers
Battlescribe is wrong (it's currently being rewritten for the new app and has a TON of issues), and 1d4chan is very often out of date.
When Armoured Breakthrough was first written, you did need to have someone else that had MotL in the army in order to actually use the RoW. This is the RAW from HH6: Retribution. However, when the new generic legions book came out a few months later it contained updated rules for Armoured Breakthrough. The MoA now counts as a MotL for the purposes of taking the Armoured Breakthrough RoW (and that RoW only), which means you don't have to take a Delegatus, Praetor or Primarch if you don't want to.
It also clears up that the MoA doesn't HAVE to be your Warlord (previously it did), but since his warlord trait is the +1BS and Command Tank upgrade you have to keep him as the warlord or he becomes a generic Sicaran/Predator like any other. For example, if you want to run Armoured Breakthough and stick Castrmen Orth in a super heavy tank to hide your warlord behind 12 hull points of heavy armour your MoA is going to lose all his handy warlord perks and just turn in a vanilla tank; however, you can still do that, keep the MoA as your warlord, but your big fuck-off tank just gets Orth's rules bonuses and your warlord is still (relatively) vulnerable in that he's just a tank that can get blown up.
Hope that clears things up for you. In general, though, DO NOT TRUST BATTLESCRIBE. It's RIDDLED with errors, many of which were from reverting to previous old files when the new program version was released and everyone had to scramble to redo all the data files. ALWAYS double check against the rulebooks.
Grayson Gray
>A lot of your dudes stuff (which I rarely if ever see here) and ideas for armies. We have them. We call it "Knight user". Make of it what you will. >And campaign ideas, ideas for warzones, sectors and linked games to decide the fate of dozens of worlds. So, rules writing? We also have those, I thought you didn't like it. I've been here since HH3. Or HH4, I don't remember. All I've known is scanbegging and memes.
Jack Parker
[REDACTKEKED]
Henry Roberts
Gimp actually, while we're on the subject does anyone have an Imperial document sanctioned for purging stamp?
Camden Anderson
I think that symbol is post-heresy but I am not sure.
Gabriel Brooks
It's not, it's just a general variant of the elites symbol. People just confuse it with the Crux Terminatus sub variant.
Zachary Gray
What's this thing with people saying the Stormlord isn't an assault vehicle? It even has it in the name.
Matthew Morales
>assault cannon >heavy flamer
Matthew Morgan
Because it isn't.
David Ward
Original guy asking, thank you, you are right!
Hunter Reed
Sorry. I'm stupid
Connor Bell
Oh, I thought it was like open topped except for the +1 vehicle damage. Booooooo!
John Campbell
>Stormlord I don't see the words "Assault Vehicle" in there at all. In fact, Stormlord is one word!
Cameron Thompson
No, there different versions across the black books and transfer sheets.
Christian Phillips
Fair.
It literally says it's open-topped when you disembark.
Page 88 of the mini rulebook:
>PASSENGERS CHARGING FROM OPEN-TOPPED TRANSPORTS
"Acting as an ideal attack platform, all Open-topped Transports have the Assault Vehicle special rule."
immediately below that:
>ASSAULT VEHICLE
"Passengers disembarking from Access Points on a vehicle with this special rule can charge on the turn they do so (even on a turn that the vehicle was destroyed) unless the vehicle arrived from Reserve that turn."
Since it is Open-topped when you disembark, it has the Assault Vehicle special rule when you disembark. Since that rule specifically refers to disembarking, you can charge when you disembark from a Stormlord.
Luke Phillips
NEVER! CURZEFAG!
Cameron Hill
It's treated as open-topped for embarking and disembarking purposes and usually that lets you assault after disembarking.
Then again, I looked at the rulebook and it says that all models with Open-Topped rule have the Assault Vehicle rule. But the Stormlord is not Open-Topped, it's merely treated as such for the purpose of embarking and disembarking. Like how a model can move like jump infantry, but would not be considered as jump infantry in any other respects.
So does this mean units cannot charge out of the Stormlord? Would seem so.
Jackson Moore
But... what else would being open topped for embarking and disembarking even mean? Just that the entire hull can be treated as an access point?
You can shoot out of it as if it's open topped, too, can't you? Pretty sure the reason it's not explicitly open topped is so that you don't get +1 on the damage table like you would against other open topped vehicles.
Noah Edwards
>Acting as an ideal attack platform, all Open-topped Transports have the Assault Vehicle special rule. But it's not an open topped vehicle. It's not an open topped vehicle in the movement phase. You disembark from it as though it was an open topped vehicle, which means you disembark from any point of the vehicle.
Xavier Wilson
How do people here customize their Rhino's? Especially what kind of addons do you use to represent extra armor?
Grayson Hall
>Just that the entire hull can be treated as an access point? Yes exactly that. >You can shoot out of it as if it's open topped, too, can't you? No, no you can't, read fire points here
Luke Cook
>But it's not an open topped vehicle.
It is when you disembark from it, which is when Assault Vehicle matters.
A) I would have thought that Assault Vehicle mattered in the assault phase, which is not at all when you disembark. B) It's not an open topped vehicle when you disembark from it, it counts as one for disembarking purposes i.e. where the access points are, and nothing else.
Gabriel Lewis
I don't bother with extra armour, but 15 point multi-meltas are pretty sick on Rhinos, and you get two of them in the pintle-mounted weapons pack