WOW VITALIK THAT'S FUCKED UP

fake tweet

It's a true, but not socially acceptable position to hold
Based money skeleton knows he's rich, and untouchable so he doesn't care what normalfags think

RIP career.

You will be missed money skeleton.

...

dump eth. hurting children is not based. locations will be tracked of anyone promoting hurting children on the internet. you have been warned

Won't be so untouchable once they find his CP stash, nonces like him don't last long in jail

Saying you can argue for something is not the same as saying you agree with it.

>hurting children is not based
whos hurting children though

fucking this
he doesn't need to tiptoe around normies' feelings anymore. He says the truth because hes untouchable.

>simple possession of child porn does not impose risks on others
>It does imply you bought it or helped fund CP

And the production of CP imposes risks on others. Are you retarded?

Typo, I meant "doesn't imply". This is why he explicitly stressed "simple possession".

If you lack the reading comprehension to make that out, you are the Norman.

What if the cp is 18 years old?

how is it true cp requries a child being raped you moron you and money skelly should get some sun

ETH literally has not stopped mooning since that post. kek

I read what you wrote, not what you meant to write. My reading comprehension was on point. I agree with you though.

The point one could make is that one guy's possession fosters networks of pedos, and those encourage production of new cp

Exactly

Witch hunting someone because they stumbled across CP is insane. Going after torrents and purchasers makes perfect sense.

Doing heroin affects others in terms of where you do it, the health costs, children nearby, disposal, and the fact that the god damn Mexico Cartels that murder thousands of people are the ones bringing it up destroying the communities of white men.

Buddy, he could hire the best lawyers in the world. The only reason people go to jail for possession half the time is because they plea bargain immediately

Japanese sites have a shitload of cp flying around.
Im not going to browse japanese sites ever again after what I saw

I dont even know what I was searching for but I never expected to see cp as soon as I opened a search result from google

If you don't know how supply and demand works, it's you who's the Norman.

More consumption = more production
Man, did you go all in on LINK with those kind of "critical thinking" skills.

discord.gg/ESrPQ5E

crytpo chat group

>WOW VITALIK THAT'S FUCKED UP
not an argument

>The point one could make is that one guy's possession fosters networks of pedos,
and what happens to pedos that have absolutely 0 access to cp?

when sex robots become a real thing do you think child models should be illegal? would child sex robots increase, decrease, or have no effect on actual child sexual abuse?

I'm not into it at all but they really need to make a distinction between child and adolescent porn, alot of people get pinned as a full blown pedophiles for looking at pictures of 16-17 year olds

Irrelevant, once the child has been raped, they can't be unraped regardless of what you do with the evidence

fuck off with your scam pnd groups faggot. i hope you knos that the founder of those groups is getting rich off of dumping on you idiots

You're reading comprehension was perhaps less than on point if you missed the entire point of the post due to a typo. Perhaps your accuracy, but not comprehension. The typo went in direct opposition to everything else I said. Not like it really matters anyway though.

>one guy's possession fosters networks of pedos
This is only if you're seeding, sharing, or somehow helping the revenue of the distributors. There are a lot of implicit assumptions you make in saying that, and Vitalik was arguing a pure case of "simple possession".

Real life isn't really this clear cut and pure though, so I think his adversaries got lost in that, as their normies brains applied these implicit assumptions casually and subconsciously. Vitalik was arguing like the situation was as pure as mathematics, and while that's the foundations for any good logical argument, it's bound to trip up normies.

16 17 is legal to fuck though but not legal to film.

t. 24 and going to sex a 16 year old next week (hopefully)

>a child can "consent" to being put onto hormones before puberty which completely destroy its physiology for life

>a child cannot consent to a sexual act

both of these cannot exist in the same reality

should have been named tranny

My father had someone at his company plant CP on multiple people's computers. Not his own, but some employee who was mad did it.

They found out it was the guy because he was sloppy about it, but before they did, the first person they found was a man and his life was almost ruined in a day. Luckily for him a bunch of other people "also had CP" which led them to actually investigate it closer.

You're assuming the demand has monetary value attached to it. In this case, he was arguing possession, not demand. He could've quite literally purchased a computer with CP already on it (unknowingly, say from Goodwill).

This is an example of a situation in which Vitalik is absolutely right.

He'll be driving lambos on D-wing

further, you're making continued implicit assumptions. Vitalik never mentioned consumption, only possession.

You have to learn to stick the argument, and not bury it in potential implications which aren't applicable in the strict terms of the debate, Norman. Hopefully my example above helped.

A lot of people post these child model videos. I forgot the name but i think its kinda popular.
Theyre supposed to be tame but also kinda lewd at the same time

What I saw was a fucking cp video from them with the same "model" people posted around.

Cant fucking see that shit anymore

>i'm a werewolFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

I'm pretty sure people only do this because, if you KNOW your kid is going to transition (how do you know, rite? that's the trick) but if you get in there before puberty kicks in, you can actually transition and LOOK like the gender you want to be, rather than looking like a male that transitioned to a female or vis versa.

I'm not gonna argue against more passable dickgrills out in the wild.

Not sure if it was a tiger but its awfuly similar

Do you have anymore avant-garde wojaks?

Unless there's a documented medical scan or chemical test that can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that a child would transition (which there isn't) then it shouldn't be up to them at all.

It's abuse at the highest level, all for political leftism

transexualism is a mental illness or it's forced on kids by dyke parents. it's child abuse and these parents should be publicly hanged.

in about 10 years there is going to be a huge wave of lawsuits. these kids who were permanently physiologically crippled are going to jew-up and sue the absolute dogshit out of the doctors, insurers, and their parents. screencap this. if i could put money on it i would

...

ok no thats fucking pedophilia. I hope you get arrested

You enrich the producers of it, in one way or another. Either directly, by buying it from them, or indirectly, by supplying ad revenue to distributors of the material. If you are in possession of child porn, then you have contributed to the problem by being part of the demand for that material. So long as that demand exists, the porn will continue to be produced.

When I establish my Reich, child molestors, pornographers, and CP holders will be summarily rounded up and raped to death by feral niggers

>t. was molested as a kid

what about having pictures of cute lollis?

You probably deserved it you gargantuan faggot.

priced in

you're both retarded. his whole point is that you can argue the inverse of either position just as easily, hes just fucking with the guy

>fucking a sexually mature woman who is fully of reproductive age
>pedophilia

AYO HOL UP

so you be saying that humans have been pedophiles up until Our Savior Legislatures artificially imposed 18 as an "adult"?

SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEIIIIIITTTTTTT

Sadly its legal son. She wants my dick and theres nothing you can do about it.

Unless you give me 1 eth or ltc

>his whole point is that you can argue the inverse of either position just as easily
Nope, Vitalik is objectively correct here. If you think you can argue the inverse of his stance effectively, I invite you to do so. But please at least read my comments above first, in which I BTFO a couple Norman's before you who tried to do so.

>16
>sexually mature
then I guess its okay to fuck early bleeders too. time to lower the age to 10

>16
>sexually mature
absolutely correct

>then I guess its okay to fuck early bleeders too. time to lower the age to 10
strawman.

Learn about David Peter Reimer and Dr. John Money and realize how terrible an idea this is to do to your child. And David Reimer had his dick burned off at birth so he had legitimate reason to be trans, but it still failed miserably, began presenting himself as a man as an adult and killed himself. These stupid lesbos are playing with fire.

He's objectively right though.

SELL SELL SELL NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Yett somehow there's brainlets in this very thread who don't see that.

He is 100% correct though?

hurry up you faggot bitch I'm waiting to rape you

...

Possession of child porn does not cause harm. The harm has already been done in the production.

A similar example can be said for the produce of slavery.
Imagine the clothing you are wearing was made by child slaves. Who is being harmed from you wearing it?

No one.
Of course the production of it does.
If you are complicit in the production of such things then you are culpable and should be punished.

the demand it causes it to be produced tho.
It wouldnt be produced if people didnt buy it.

Drawing pictures of kids harms nobody. I don't see the problem with it. Same with child sex dolls and other things of the sort.

I hope you never have a kid who gets molested, even though you probably deserve it

you forgot to address this argument:

>death by feral niggers
topkek

Buying it make you complicit in the production.

What if you stumble upon it?
What if someone sends you that in a letter?
Do you go to jail because you opened that letter?

That was his point. You'd know if you read his argument above, retard.

All the things you listed are not complicit in the production, thus cause no harm.

Oh sorry.