How do you paladin?

Secretly.

>a literal shit-eating cuckold
>Antifa to boot
lolwut

...

You seem to be lost.

Cheerfulness, reason, common sense.
In seven game sessions my lad has only drawn his sword twice.

Don't you have something to burn in Berkeley, Antifag?

...

>tfw you will never succerpunch a nazi

>Rogue sneak attacks Paladin.
Poor taste.

Eh, shit-eating Antifa cuckold suckerpunchs a literally who trying to ride on the coattails of someone else's success.
>Rogue sneak attacks Bard
is probably more fitting. Besides, the MAGA party laughed as hard at Spencer getting popped as they did at finding out just how filthy the rat that slugged him was. Spencer's a shit, not even a shitlord.

>all these fucking cowards to afraid to call this dude an anti fascist.
You're fascists, stop running from that you fucking cuckolds, admit that you're a nazi, get punched and fuck off.

...

If your answer isn't this there's something wrong with you

You know nothing of justice!
enjoy your new wife

It's amazing you seem to think anti-fascist is some kind of insult.

Like... 90% of our medias heroes aren't based around that.

You will always have the moral high ground if there's nobody to challenge it.

>I don't like what someone's saying
>they shouldn't be allowed to say it
>I'm going to use violence to prove it!

Who's the fascist here, exactly?

Still a nazi.

The person calling for genocide?

Rather be called a nazi than a suckerpuncher.

Good. Becouse the good times are over for you.

Enjoy getting suckerpunched.

Nazi.

He's not German. He's not a member of the National Socialist Party. He's not a member of the Wehrmacht.

He's literally not a Nazi. He could be a racist, white supremacist, etc, etc, whatever shit you want to call the man, but by any and all definitions, Nazi is not one of them.

>hurr hurr Nazi means person I don't like

Genocide existed before Nazis. It's like the Holodomor never happened for you people.

Why don't you call him a Communist?

>Trump is literally Hitler and everyone that voted for him are Nazis!
>half of America are Nazis
>the good time for Nazis are over

Yes, amazing. This is exactly why Hilldawg lost.

My Templar.

>lost
More people voted for her. She won.

...

The holodomor targeted an economic group, not a racial one. Hence, not technically a genocide

You want to talk about pre-nazi genocides? Look at the Armenian massacres in the late Ottoman empire

How come Google says the president is Trump.

What kind of economic grup are ukrainians?

Taking more pieces in Chess doesn't mean you win.

The electoral college is in place to ensure shitholes like California and New York don't singlehandedly determine the President for the entire country.

She had less than a 3% voter turnout in comparison to Trump, yet lost staggeringly in terms of the percentages of people living in each State that preferred Trump.

She won nothing.

Only good answer in this thread.

>shitholes like California and New York
Oh, so instead shining beacons of progres like wyoming or texas should?

Farmers, peasants

Like the Azerbaijani and other northeastern europeans under the soviet union that died during the Holodomor

Don't get me wrong here, the Holodomor was horrific, but the clear intent was to stamp out the middle-class of farmers and rural workers across the entire soviet union, not just in Ukraine, even if Ukraine was where most of them were

>Holodomor
Never happened, asshole.

No, and that's the point. That's why the electoral college is in place. So that the majority of the states decides the outcome, not the majority of the people. When you live in a democratic republic, you must take the results of DEMOCRACY.

His approval rating is below 50% in 8 days and the election had a record setting low turnout

People were stupid and apathetic and are now regretting everything.

Oh and this also isn't getting into things like suspect voter registration which is a whole other kettle of fish.

Isn't that what the senate is for?

Why do you have two layers of government that both exist to ensure that less populated states have more of a say? Shouldn't one be enough?

Not even the lowest approval rating of a president. "People" is too generic; I know tons of Trump supporters that regret nothing and are still very passionate.

Anecdotal evidence is trash.

You mean like the 800,000 minimum confirmed illegal votes for Shillary?

Senate is for legislation, not elections. Both are monsterous enough endeavors to require separate attention.

So, ok, what layer of government then favors the actual populations over the states?

Surely there should be at least one that doesn't care about what individual states say and focuses on the actual number of voters

>You mean like the 800,000 minimum confirmed illegal votes for Shillary?

Like to see where you got that number.

>Anecdotal evidence is trash.

2017inagurationcrowd.jpg

While still illegal to assault, white supremacy, neo nazis, and fascism have no place in reasonable discourse.

It's a complete false equivalence to equate violent rejection of those that violate some of the most basic, inherent ideas of our collective society to "somebody you don't like" or "somebody you disagree with"

You disagree about shit like taxes, inspection standards, political shit like that, not where or not human beings are worthy of living.

you ought to realize that nazi, much like fascist, has taken on meanings beyond its literal definition. Jackass.

>there should be at least one that doesn't care about what individual states say and focuses on the actual number of voters

That's literally not a democratic republic though, user.

The entire country is founded on ideals strictly contrary to that.

>2017inagurationcrowd.jpg
You mean the mass media pics that show the event well before it actually started?

The way presidential elections work, she lost. I do think the electoral college is massively flawed, but that doesn't change anything. It is what it is.

>800k+ minimum confirmed illegal votes
Still no actual sources on that, nor an answer as to how somebody so manipulative and ingrained into the system was stupid enough to not put those voters in states that she needed to win the electoral college instead of stuffing liberal states she would win by a huge margin anyway.

Wait... a democratic republic isn't a democracy?

The fuck? I knew various dictatorships named countries retarded lie-filled names like "Democratic people's republic of Korea" but I didn't realise that the very term "democratic republic" meant "not a democracy"

I don't care. The left acts more fascist than the right in America by a wide margin. Attempting to censor what people say, think or do is revolting.

If someone says something you don't like, yes, they might get punched. But that's still assault, and the man should be held accountable for assault.

We already have provocation laws for a reason and regardless if you disagree on the man's opinion, what he's said to date is not in violation of those to incite violence against him.

People that have a problem with it should deal with it through legal means.

Uh.... yeah.

A democratic republic is a REPUBLIC, *not* a democracy.

>A Republic is representative government ruled by law (the Constitution). A democracy is direct government ruled by the majority (mob rule). A Republic recognizes the inalienable rights of individuals while democracies are only concerned with group wants or needs (the public good).

>thread about paladins
>40 or so posts later, /pol/

Huh

Ok, wasn't aware of that difference in meaning

Thanks

Still glad I live in a country where the city I live in doesn't determine whether I get 3.5 times more votes as someone else living in a different city. Must really feel like shit knowing that your vote straight up doesn't matter as much as someone else's just because of location

>Attempting to censor what people say or think

While I've got a plethora of problems with the left, last I saw there was zero legislation proposed to limit peoples' speech.

Even the scapegoat of tumblr says "you shouldn't say things" not "it should be illegal"
They're called "Social Justice Warriors" not "Legal Justice Warriors"

Sadly most Americans do not realize that they live in a republic and most of the things they like are actually because of the republic and not democracy.

>mfw people don't understand that Hilldawg lost because America isn't a democracy

So by your definition, the US electoral system is not representative of either a republic nor a democracy?

...

Correct. America is a democratic republic. It's kind of a mishmash of both concepts that the founding fathers attempting to superglue together with the Constitution.

It's why some things in America make zero fucking sense.

You ultimately cannot preserve the inalienable rights of the individual AND attempt to push for the good of the people. At some point there must be concessions on either the masses or the individual.

Yup, been that way for a long time. Comes from back when states were more like mini-countries, so they were concerned about federal law ruining a state's well-being. Although that also came typically because of concerns about trade laws, particularly those involving slavery.

The electoral college can seem fair from a certain point of view, if you think of it from a geographical/class based perspective.
Liberals tend to congregate into larger populations, Conservatives tend to spread out. The culture of said places influences those there, so large populations lean liberal, smaller ones lean conservative.

On a pure 'democracy' level it's horseshit, but on a level of equal stake in federal representation, the fairness is plausible. I still think it's dumb, but it makes a certain sense.

90% of our heroes are not based around vandalism and cowardly ganging up to attack people. Antifa are literally the goons that any hero has too beat before the BBEG.

So rather than try to protect the rights of the individual or the whole, it protects neither.
Makes about as much sense as creating a classless society by making everyone a peasant..

To be fair that's how most classless societies work, briefly, before people jockey internally for power.

Although I believe the intention was rather than try to protect the rights of individuals or the whole, it protects BOTH... within reason.

The founding fathers were basically a bunch of hard ass gun nuts that believed everyone should be armed, everyone else should fuck off, and that everyone who shared these beliefs should move here legally and reinforce them in kind.

Most modern people are way, way too soft for what the constitution has in mind. Masses do not give one insular fuck about their inalienable rights and would gladly trade them for creature comforts.

This is usually the source of most strife - do you either change the constitution to match the people of the times, or do you reinforce the constitution and tell people to nut up?

The latter is more "AMERICAN" but the former is more modern.

>Its not okay to assault someone
>Unless the strawman I make of them is unpalatable
>Then its ok to attack them for wrong think
really makes you think

>you ought to realize that nazi, much like fascist, has taken on meanings beyond its literal definition.
Yeah Nazi/fascist now means person I dont like

What is hate speech legislation?

The house of representatives idk how you know about the senate but have no idea about our other legislative body. Pro-tip next time try google

the only proper way to paladin
youtube.com/watch?v=yE8C1WWixgc&t=6s

My current GM is currently serving six months in prison because he thought that he would get away with socking a naz-

HANG ON A FUCKING SECOND, I've been seeing a lot of pro-violence stances against nazis lately on here, on Imgur, on Reddit, on Voat and people who call them out or remind people that we have laws on this fucking planet get threatened/downvoted/slid into silence.

There's shilling going on and I don't like it.