Would you let a kitsune in your party?

Would you let a kitsune in your party?

Other urls found in this thread:

i.4cdn.org/tg/1495520444156.jpg
docs.google.com/document/d/1GvwMclLSw15slYI7D5xLdjMzr-Nau92hNha9Sx0LOk4/edit#
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

DOTS

No, since I don't play inferior editions.

I see you and raise you this.

>PFG's current OP Image
i.4cdn.org/tg/1495520444156.jpg

Holy fuck, is this Pathfinder, or MAID RPG?

Yes.

Only if they were playing an actual kitsune, and not just a fox furry.

>Kitsune
>Not just a girl with fox traits but a full fledged furry
NO

Dunno, is the player good and trustworthy? 'Coz your picture is 3 out of 10 kenders

>monstergirlfaggotry
>not shit tier
Either stay human or go full furfag.
Sticking fox ears on a girl does not make her a foxgirl, just a girl with fox ears.
Girl monsters not monster girls, okay?

...

>5EG's current OP Image

>weeaboo mad at being called out on his shit taste

Black people exist. Time to accept it.

only if they identified as a "fleshy" and wore a rubber fleshsuit and went to fleshy conventions

prove it faggot

I'm pretty sure the point was that the image WASN'T weeaboo anime fur-faggotry, not that the character was black.

Weeaboo anime fur-faggotry is preferable to blacks.

...

Fuck you

no, because i don't play D&D

>weeaboo
>unironically using this buzzword
go back to /v/ or /pol/ or whatever shithole you crawled out from

No. I'm GM, and I'm not writing the lore needed to throw fucking furfaggotry into my setting. I'm also not reading whatever shitpost-given-publishing you've got for kitsune. I've got more important things to work on than your fetish. Also you can't be a golem, vampire, lycanthrope, dragon, or anything that begins with "Half" and does not end with either Orc, Elf, or Ling.

>i hate fun: the post
fuck off, you are ruining this hobby

For you.

I play with a lot of people in a club, so I tend to play with random people.

If someone is playing a kitsune, tengu, or other furry/scaly race, I will play with them (because I am signed up for it). If there is any kind of magical realm shit involved, then fuck no.

So, it depends why they made it.

damn you really showed me. great comeback. really.

Is the player a fur-fag? Then heck no, because this is going to get magical realmy in no time.
Is the player a normal, functional person? Then go ahead. This might be fun.

>if it's fun for me it's fun for everybody
I'm glad you're upset and I pity your GM.

>implying it's a buzzword
Go jerk off into your jap pillow, fag

Hotheads, get out.

restriction of creative freedom is usually a bad thing user.
yes it is when its used to mean "anyone that likes anime or anything japanese". so fuck off.

Restriction breeds creativity.

I disagree

That's what weeaboo means. It doesn't mean anything else.

They can be okay. Sometimes the race has better features than any of the humanoid races. The shape-change thing is pretty powerful.

>yes it is when its used to mean "anyone that likes anime or anything japanese". so fuck off.
t. weeb
Anyone who cares enough about japshit to call out the usage of "weeb" is so obviously a weeb it's not even funny.

I can litterally smell the pocky and wasabi kitkat from you through my monitor.

Your opinion is wrong, mi famigo.

Fuck off, furfag

>That's what weeaboo means.
No it doesn't. The term has been co-oped to mean something entirely different.
It is obvious you are just looking for reasons to hate anything that is vaguely "anime". I just hate it when people dismiss things because of superficial looks and it is a rampant problem on boards like this one as well as /v/.

No

>implying I hate anime
>implying I don't watch it fairly regularly
It's not the anime, it's that your an autistic shitlicker that's so in love with his big-eyed oriental slipcover that he can't bare the thought of anyone saying anything mean ever about grorious nippon.

The fact that "weeaboo" is the part of my post you latched on to is damning proof that you are, in fact, a weeb. There was plenty else you could have gone on about, but no, it was "muh anime"

kys.

Enlighten me, then. What does it mean?

When a player brings in anime stuff, it usually doesn't have any substance. Just like when people play beast-races. It's not inherently bad, like heroin alone isn't inherently bad, but it's not a good sign.

>Kitsune are inherently mischievous, though most often this is due to their misunderstanding of generally accepted morality

Fuck off

Literally Kender, but for furfags, get it out of my game.

Weeb is someone who thinks of japanese culture as pinnacle of humanity, drools over animes, mangas, katanas, japanese architecture style, language and other junk.

>The fact that "weeaboo" is the part of my post you latched on to is damning proof that you are, in fact, a weeb.
>you pointed out that i misused the term weeb so you must be a weeb!
what is this logic? it just means i know what words mean you fucking idiot.
>There was plenty else you could have gone on about
so you do admit your argument is inherently flawed.
It means to obssess over Japan and Japanese culture, to put it above everything, and to generally be a dick and an autist about it.
>When a player brings in anime stuff, it usually doesn't have any substance.
Then you should've said that in the first place. My only point was that anime and Japanese things aren't inherently bad.

There was another user posting in conjunction with me.

This is first me People sling around weeb just like the sling around the term fag for liking traps.

>implying you hate anime
>implying you don't watch it fairly regularly
Bad news: you're a weeb too, user. In fact, you're the only proven weeb in the thread.

>People sling around weeb just like the sling around the term fag for liking traps
but a person isn't a weeb for just liking anime in the same way that a person isn't homosexual for liking traps.

goddamit WEEB ISN'T SOMEONE WHO WATCHES ANIMES
WEEB IS A WAPANESE OTHERKIN WHO THINKS HE'S A DAYMO

...

Yeah. So, it's used hyperbolically or as an over-exaggeration.

Leave this thread. Go watch ghost stories.

>alignment
DROPPED

>So, it's used hyperbolically or as an over-exaggeration.
wow its almost like using hyperbollies is bad for communication. HOLY SHIT

Would you let someone play a huli jing in Pathfinder?

docs.google.com/document/d/1GvwMclLSw15slYI7D5xLdjMzr-Nau92hNha9Sx0LOk4/edit#

Huli Jing
These kitsune have a reputation for being dangerous seductresses and malevolent tricksters. Born with the ability to drain energy, they possess a hunger for the essence of living beings, gaining sustenance and immortality through the consumption of others’ lives.

Humanoid (akashic, kitsune, shapechanger): Huli jing have the akashic subtype in addition to the normal kitsune’s type and subtypes.

Devour Essence (Su): A huli jing can drain the vital essence of a living creature they lure into an act of passion (such as a kiss). During combat, this can be done once per round as a move action against a pinned or helpless creature adjacent to them. The huli jing deals 1 point of Constitution damage to the target and forces them to succeed at a Will save (DC 10 + 1/2 the huli jing’s character level + the huli jing’s Charisma modifier) or become nauseated for one round, potentially making it difficult for them to escape further draining by the huli jing. Against a veilweaver or other creature that possesses akashic essence, the huli jing can choose to inflict 1 point of essence burn instead of Constitution damage with this ability. A huli jing who successfully uses this ability does not need to eat or drink for one day per point of damage or essence burn dealt, and does not age for an equal duration (this effect is cumulative). This racial trait replaces kitsune magic.

Essence of the Succubus: Huli jing are always considered to have the Essence of the Succubus veil shaped, and do not count it against their total veils shaped or their veil slots. However, they cannot invest essence in this veil normally. Any time the huli jing uses their devour essence ability, they gain a point of temporary essence that is automatically invested in this veil and cannot be reinvested. This essence lasts for one day, and stacks with itself up to character’s cap on invested essence (normally 1 essence up to 5th level, 2 essence from 6th through 11th levels, 3 essence from 12th through 17th levels, and 4 essence from 18th through 20th levels). As this veil does not count against the huli jing’s veil slots or chakras, they can still shape a different veil into the same slot as this it freely. If the huli jing uses another ability to shape the Essence of the Succubus veil (such as a veilweaving class), they can invest essence into it normally in addition to the temporary essence gained from this ability. This racial trait replaces agile.

Essence of the Succubus
Descriptors: none; Class: Daevic; Slot: Blood; Saving Throw: none
An unnaturally beautiful being sits upon her throne, a twisted smile on her lips as the power of akasha causes all to kneel in worship before her.
When this veil is formed the wearer’s body is slowly reshaped into an image of utter perfection by the akasha coursing through their veins. The veilweaver gains a +1 circumstance bonus to all Charisma-based skill or ability checks against creatures that would be attracted to them.
Essence: The bonus granted by this ability increases by +1 for each point of essence invested.
Chakra Bind (Blood): When the wearer binds this veil to their blood, their body is molded into a near perfect version of itself. The veilweaver ignores any penalties due to negative modifiers in any of their physical ability scores (this includes Dexterity penalties to AC, negative modifiers applied to skill checks like Climb or Swim, etc.). If an ability score is reduced to zero due to ability damage or drain, you are still rendered unconscious or dead, as appropriate. In addition, the wearer gains an enhancement bonus to their Charisma score equal to the number of points of essence invested.

Whatever, unlike mcAutism down here , I don't sperg out about words.

Lol weeb

Shrine fox? Fuck yes. Trickster fox? Fuck no.

I was challenged to make a good character out of a CN dickass rogue kitsune, and eventually settled on having them be a weapons dealer in the setting's conflict. They had lost their friends to deals gone wrong a few times, so ended up a rather cynical sarcastic cunt, but is still up for a laugh whenever the opportunity arises. Slow to trust people though. Enjoys a drink, and is always there when a profit is to be made. If he thinks someone is useful to keep around, he'll do what he can to keep them near.

Overall, I think I did okay, but was sad the idea still got rejected.
If I were DMing, I'd pay more attention to the character's backstory than their race, since just a race isn't good enough to get a grasp on the character.

...

>///

...

>DDlgdoodles
>DDlg
Johnson is right!

If it's in the book.

I find it funny through people being biased against a character race. Have you guys tried not playing with retards?

Don't care about the artist, I still think it's cute.

>Have you guys tried not playing with retards?

I'm surprised anyone can play Pathfinder and still complain about all this "furry" or "anime" bullshit.

So what is a normal Ling?

A restricted Human Only Campaign can be interesting. 25 point buy and everyone must pick different starting classes.

How can you play Pathfinder without being a furfag yourself?

Don't bother arguing with him because I'm very sure he is both /v/ermin and a newfag

Eh, why not? We could use a shugenja

Are they a fuzzy human or a human with ears and a tail? Probably not.
Are they some sort of weird essentially fey thing with a strange morality and is also just a damn fox at the same time? Sure.

Whenever I play a race with the misfortune of being a furry race for whatever reason if I ever, I'll play it as non magical realmy as can be and play it on its stereotype.

>Kitsune: make a kind hearted bard with the tendency to troll people.

>Catfolk: make a jungle hunter that loves the thrill of the hunt/ make a rogue with the love of stealing shit and lying, also name him Khajiit/ make not!Puss in Boots.

I don't like furries.

It turns out that it's only as difficult as learning to play Pathfinder.

> Catfolk
> He

You're going to be seeing a lot more Kitsune and other animal races once Starfinder comes out.

Tons of Star Fox Assault and Adventure based campaigns.
Loads of people asking about Trash Panda stats so they can make Sly Cooper IN SPESSSSSS
Maybe even a few Jazz Jackrabbit campaigns

No.

If I was playing with my close friends, yes.

If I was playing with strangers, no.

>Would you let a kitsune in your party?
I'm not sure what you mean by that.
Would the kitsune be a starting PC and I the GM in that scenario? Would I be a player, having to decide in-character whether to trust a kitsune NPC?
The third option, that I am a player and the kitsune is another PC allowed by the GM, doesn't give me a choice besides refusing to play the game altogether.

I can't decide what this thread does a better job of proving: that this place still clings to decade-stale Something Awful memes out of stubborn tradition, or that weebs are indeed far worse than furries because of their open hostility if you dare insult their monstergirl shit or dare engage with them.

It's clear the OP was just trying to bait for these kinds of reactions, but it's pathetic how many people still fell for it anyway. For those screaming "furfag", here's a little tip: you make your own demons. By having a knee-jerk reaction to them, you're only giving them power over you. If you just learned to accept that people enjoy playing anthro characters and aren't ALWAYS doing it for fetish purposes, you'll be a lot less angry. After all, "furry" characters have existed in human history far longer than you or your garbage fingerpaint animations, and you should seriously ask yourself if you want to still be angry at a niche internet subculture when you're in your fucking 60s.

>"I'll play it as non magical realmy as can be"

Look at this dumb shit.
Why is the furry creature blushing? Blushing is something happens to skin, not fur.
Dumbass furries,

This. Animals ears on human doesn't look sex, they look just retarded.

...

Sure, we could use an illusionist, but we'll have to place a binding on it before we go near mainland imperial cities or monasteries. Wouldn't do do have the locals blaming her for 'essence vampirism' (apparently there was a HUGE difference in how fox spirits were seen in China vs Japan.)

Yes because I trust my friends and know how they play.

Kitsune is just a mythological monster. It doesn't necessarily come with any preconceptions. For all I know, the player who wants to play a kitsune never even read anything apart from the original Japanese fairytales. Why should I say no?

I was going to either run a starfox campaign or drop them in as cameos in a cantina bar. All you need is stats for a bunny race and you can run Starfox games easily.

Not in 5e since I don't play that shitty system. But I would in PF, hell if they want to make a coyote or jackal based version go ahead, it's literally just a change to coloration. Hell, they can even be European fox people, since Europe had its own trickster foxes too.

Furries older than anime: at least 40,000 years in fact, as evidence look up the Lion-man/woman of the Hohlenstein-Stadel.

Only if the setting I had built included them as a race or there was some other reasonable justification.

I've let people play odd things, but I've always insisted on justification for the character to be in the party. Something that seems reasonable to me.

Usually I insist on pretty narrow race options for the beginning of a campaign. Later, if the group is passing through an area that has an unusual race and a player wants to play one I will look for a way for the switch to be made. But not usually at the beginning of a campaign.

Tell them "no". If they say "Oh, okay. I'll pick something else," that means they probably wouldn't be weird about playing a kitsune and thus have my blessing to do so. If they whine and freak out, then they are the reason kitsune are so maligned and are thus not allowed to play as one.

No, YOU'RE kink a shit.

Butthurt furry detected.

As for the post, I've heard the horror stories of Kitsune players but never saw it in a game. If I'm running things, I'm reticent to shoot down an idea because I want everyone to have fun in my game. I think it would depend on the player. If I knew them well enough to know they weren't trying to take this to their magical realm, then I'd allow it and basically ignore that they're a fox thing. If I don't know them, or this is obviously going to be Magical Realm for them, then I think I'd disallow.

I think it depends on how it's played. I'm probably not going to accept it into the party immediately, and am going to treat it as the outcast that it is. If it can earn my trust and prove it's self, then It can come.

A space animal might be kind of cool for a scifi setting.

Good point.

My experience with furs in games are bad. The dude who I last played with constantly tried to force his wolf fucking back story into any story beat we were currently in.

He also kept inviting the group to his fur meetups and would have fur porn out on his desk during games. I stopped going to those games after a while because eventually every normal player left and kept getting replaced by fucking fur players.

Terrible taste, senpai.

Four ears! Four ears!

The surest sign of a terrible anime or manga. Fucking japanese and not knowing anatomy.

Can't they just use that third party one that's already out? Most of the races in that are boring animal people.

NIPPLES DO NOT WORK THAT WAY

Well, at least that's traditional: when Spelljammer came out, the only non-anthro race in it was the Scro. Everything else was some flavor of furry; two kinds of lizardfolk (normal and hurwaeti), two kinds of ape-people (hadozee and grommams), hippo-people (giff), mantis-people (xixchil) and centipede-taurs (rastipedes).