Why are all forgeworlds models better than gamesworkshops?
>>53440159
Other urls found in this thread:
forgeworld.co.uk
twitter.com
Delusion.
Because the dust that come off them from filing mould lines can cause cancer.
It's the price you have to pay.
>80 pounds
Here you go.
>they mention a model also in their catalog
>a primarch model
>related to the one described in the article
>they provide a link
>what did they mean by this
I wasn't refering to that link, but to the one after "Pre-order Magnus, and his new display base here:" the link after that sentence directs to Leman Russ.
I think you can make a good argument for FW Guilliman, but to me FW Magnus still falls short. He seems to have suffered from what he could have been sizewise due to FW wanting to give him a scenic base, have him form a diorama with Russ, and for some reason have all the Primarchs be relatively the same size.
It's a mistake, but the new display base is for Leman and Magnus in combat.
forgeworld.co.uk
Because they charge out the ass for them.
no nipple horns
shit/10
This one sure isnt.
Pose is a bit static.
Also, why do all primarch faces need to look so damn ugly?
All I want is a serene/smug Magnus, goddammit.
Remember he's half that size or smaller IRL
There's only so much you can do when sculpting that small, you start reaching the plastic equivalent of pixel density.
Although for £80 I'd expect a model this size to be a bit better detailed.
Also I really hope you can convert those horns on his back onto his nipples.
Citadel can be consistent with his character design why can't you FW.
>plastic
>Remember he's half that size or smaller IRL
>There's only so much you can do when sculpting that small, you start reaching the plastic equivalent of pixel density.
So?
I doubt the original sculpt is on the same cale and if you can't sculpt a face, you have no business being a sculptor.
Either his chest or his legs and arms are out of proportion there, I cant tell which.
Also no nipple horns and the shitty base are big negatives for me.
Forgeworld: Choosing the worst photo angles for their models since 1996.
Why did they get rid of the nipple horns though, it's one of the things that made Magnus Magnus besides being a giant red cyclops and hubris. It's like making Leman Russ not a twat or Guilliman not annoying from an outside of the setting point of view.
Because they looked really fucking stupid. I guess we could go with 'they were stupidly impractical' too, but these are space marines.
I think forgeworld made a good creative decision in missing them.
Yeah, but that was part of the charm, it was so stupid and goofy that it was good.
As far as practicality goes, I think Infero may have either directly stated or implied that Magnus' armor was a psychic manifestation.
Not really.
Pretty ugly tbphwy/10
Look at this picture. This is what Magnus should have looked like. Where are the nipple horns? Why is he so scrawny?
The interns over at FW really did do Inferno.
You mean Magnus was actually naked in battle all this time?
>shitty blanche art
Opinion discarded.
Despite your shit tier opinion on Blanche can you even find a GW picture of Magnus without nipple horns?
Maybe.
Though chances are, he wore some actual armour and simply used his psycic abilities to adjust it to whatever size he was at the time (Big E probably did something similar).
At least one horn was real, but it wasn't made of bone.
HAHA! I MAKE THE PENIS JOKE!