>relevant stuff in her personality tab was enough.
Noooo--If you're going to write a backstory that long and detailed, your character's personality needs to shown in the text. If you're going to stick things in a personality section, then don't write a novel. That's the push-pull at play here.
>Yes, she stumbles upon it, but she damn well stays where she stumbles.
Cool. Then where's the support for the statement "(she) sees truth as the ultimate virtue?" How does that impact her actions?
>Freedom has little to do with it; it is mostly a link between what is "true" and what is "right", and therefore "justice" fits best.
Then support that idea. How does she come to this conclusion? Why does she come to this conclusion?
>Secondly, she spends equal amount of time "assuaging fears"
No, that's mentioned once in the middle of a paragraph, near the end of the backstory.
>her guidance is more important in higher places
Where does this come from? What gives her this idea? Why should we, as readers, believe she has *any* kind of worthwhile advice to give?
>Her motivation is literally staring death in the face and denying him his price
Really? Then maybe you should develop this idea, rather than being bogged down with all the others you've thrown in.
> I don't feel like you're doing it justice right now
As an author it's easy to fall into the trap of reading into things that aren't there. In your defense of the pillars, you're making statements that the text doesn't support. Maybe it's intended to, but it currently doesn't.
SO, now there's the question of what to do about this. The way I see it, there are two options. Fully develop every theme you intend to use. Which'll probably double the length of your piece, since you still haven't fully supported any of them. Or, cut the extemporaneous themes, and get down to core ones. Cut Justice and Spirit, since they're the least developed and the most difficult to demonstrate, and focus on Life, Death, and Truth.