How do you think society would develop differently if at age 16, without fail, every male human supernaturally received the knowledge necessary to summon a 'succubus' with no strings attached?
Specifically, the summoned 'demon' would only exist in the world to satisfy its summoner's sexual urges, and would vanish after a set period (unless extended via another 'summoning') or if it was put to work in some other capacity. The summoned being is totally enthusiastic about its role and simply cannot hold ill will towards its summoner. The means to summon it are trivial: a quiet place, a short incantation, and a few drops of the summoner's blood - other than having to bleed a bit, there are no drawbacks and no ways to interrupt, disturb, or detect the summoning apart from physically being there to mess with the summoner. Females, intersex people, and males under the age of 16 simply can't summon them, and the 'demons' will not interact with them if present.
Note that I'm only using the terms 'succubus' and 'demon' because they describe the image of what I'm talking about. The actual summoned beings have no tendency towards any sort of behavior except sexually pleasing their summoners, they don't come from any sort of cosmic underworld and they don't have supernatural powers. They may, however, have a slightly inhuman body, coming in unusual skin/hair/eye colors, possessing horns or fangs, etc. (see pic related)
So basically, this is a roundabout way of asking: if all men had their sexual needs taken care of at will, how would society change? What role would women fulfill in this society? Is it better or worse than the world we live in?
They would be intentionally summoned and then shot and dissected for science of course.
Landon Gray
Well, sure I'm certain that would be something that was attempted, but even if you have your scientific inquiry going on, I guarantee Pajeet and Ngyuen are getting their game on. Hell, damn near every single guy would be. So then how does that impact things like society's willingness to go to war, or to crush each other in business deals; how much everyday spite over sexual frustration and how much GAME gets trashed, and then, doesn't that really change the whole world a lot?
Isaiah Hall
Your question is kinda ill-formed, but I'll answer what you intended first. >So basically, this is a roundabout way of asking: if all men had their sexual needs taken care of at will, how would society change? Not very much. Of course guys would use that to get laid, but people value relationships for more than just sex. Casual hookups would be depressed, but ultimately people are still going to want to find a partner. Also, if it's just guys who get the option to do this, then there's still going to be pressure from women to have casual sex.
However: >How do you think society would develop differently if at age 16, without fail, every male human supernaturally received the knowledge necessary to summon a 'succubus' with no strings attached? Implies something very different. There's no way in hell that everyone is just going to accept something like that at face value, and there would be considerable effort put into actually studying how summoning works and finding new uses for it. Given time for that research to go somewhere, the impact on society would probably be huge.
Also: is correct.
Henry Perez
Always fap before posting, when posting, and after posting.
Juan Lee
>Not very much. I think you vastly underestimate the degree to which men are strictly behaving in ways to be rewarded with sex.
I don't disagree that people would still seek relationships, but I think the power dynamic would reverse, dramatically. Men, unencumbered from having to seek sexual relief, are likely to be far less interested in seeking partners to begin with. Those who did look would almost invariably be after mates/mothers, not pussy. I expect that to have a wholly eugenic effect on human demographics, and, furthermore, to change what society views women as to be more wholesome and 'traditional'. The other thing at play is that women will have some degree of increase in their own sexual frustration, as well as an increase in competition for actual 'mates'. OL Christmas Cake population would skyrocket, women as breadwinners and as homemakers would both improve their lot, while women as dependents and wards of the state would go extinct.
Adam Davis
>at age 16, without fail, every male human supernaturally received the knowledge necessary to summon a 'succubus' with no strings attached? >However, most men are only capable of summoning low class succubi who only believe in sex after marriage >They exclusively have sex in the missionary position in the dark while holding hands with interlocked fingers
One cannot beat the heartboner.
>I think you vastly underestimate the degree to which men are strictly behaving in ways to be rewarded with sex. Men are effectively conditioned and evolutionarily selected for being responsive to sex as a reward. A man who doesn't desire sex, a man who's indifferent to sex or even a man who enjoys sex but isn't willing to disadvantage himself for it is a man who never reproduces.
Luis Ramirez
>A man who doesn't desire sex..is a man who never reproduces. Well, in the wild, sure, but we as thinking creatures understand and feel a need to create offspring for other reasons. So disconnecting the sexual satisfaction angle from reproduction creates a more rational and healthy (eugenic) population.
Jack Lopez
>but we as thinking creatures You overestimate to what extent we're able to overcome our base instincts. You also underestimate to what extent we've legally and culturally fucked ourselves over in the West. The welfare state eliminates the strict neccessity of children, and the decline of strict monogamy and the rise of hook-up culture/the sexual revolution not only robs adultery for women of all its risks, but actually rewards it.
>OL Christmas Cake population would skyrocket, women as breadwinners [...] would both improve their lot this is my fetish
