>Magic finally does dinosaurs again
>feathered
Fuck sakes, why can't we have nice things?
>Magic finally does dinosaurs again
>feathered
Fuck sakes, why can't we have nice things?
Other urls found in this thread:
bbc.co.uk
xkcd.com
rt.com
twitter.com
>many current day avians, including chickens and turkeys, are descendant from dinosaurs.
>People still get assblasted over feathered dinosaurs because they can't accept that Jurassic Park was wrong.
fpbp
This Reminder that if they had known dinos had feathers when they made Jurassic Park, the dinos would have had feathers in Jurassic Park.
Personally, I think the real problem is that pretty much all artist depictions of Feathered dinos I've seen, OP included, are literally just Jurassic park dinos with feathers glued onto their backs.
Feather-fags BTFO.
Dinosaurs never even existed, repent you atheistic heathens
>while wholeheartedly acknowledging that dinosaurs mostly had feathers, the study argues that a T. Rex, specifically, may have been large enough that it didn't need feathers to keep itself warm
Wow, you sure showed all those featherfags, user. The fact that one dinosaur MAY have not had the feathers typical to the rest of its family specifically because of its abnormal size has completely and utterly destroyed the image of feathered dinosaurs in all our hearts.
The article you links specifically cites fossil evidence of feathers being typical in other species of Tyranosaur. Are you retarded, or do you just not bother to read shit before you decide it supports your argument?
Considering "in all of our hearts" should refer to the scaled beasts we knew when growing up.
This implies that you are underage.
I don't mind because feathered "lizards" are really cool looking.
Shit, feathered dragons were cool when MTG did them back in 2014