Stannis vs Daenerys

Who do you think would be the better ruler, should they seize the Iron Throne?

The argument for Daenerys: Daenerys is clearly more compassionate and understanding of her subjects than Stannis. Her liberation of the slaves is pretty admirable, and unlike Stannis, she can make compromises with people. It's quite impressive that she was able to take three prominent cities in Slaver's Bay despite being a foreign teenager. Like Stannis, she can also dispense harsh justice to wrongdoers such as her crucifixion of the Grand Masters and has a notion of right and wrong. However, she often lets her own emotions cloud her judgments, and the conflict in Meereen is a clear sign that she's not the perfect queen we originally expected her to be. Her unwillingness to accept that her father deserved his downfall is worrying, as this means that she would possibly punish everyone allied to Robert if she ever took the Throne.

The argument for Stannis: Stannis has had far more experience in a leadership role, ruling Dragonstone for many years as well as being a skilled naval commander. The fact that he was able to rule the Targaryen stronghold for so many years without conflict is a testament to his ruling capability. His notion of justice is in a way admirable, in his belief that no good or bad deeds must go ignored, and that good and bad acts don't wash each other out. By saving the Wall, it's clear that he's the only King that cares about the threat of the Others and acts to save the realm. However, his extreme stubbornness is a huge misgiving, as it makes ruling a feudalistic kingdom that much harder. His refusal to ally himself with either Renly or Robb Stark was borderline retarded, and his cold withdrawn personality makes it much harder to gain allies. It's clear that he lacks the political pragmatism that men like Tywin Lannister possessed in order to rule the realm effectively.

Thoughts?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=QmKhGqWcJGY
youtu.be/eFDB3cRtklY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Renly

...

Basted off what we have seen so far, Kelly C would be an awful ruler and Westeros would suffer under her. Though the show will probably end with her being le best queen ever and everyone lover her.

Stannis would be a dutiful ruler, the only thing noteworthy about him being the circumstances in which he became king.

It's been said before but stannis combined with loyal and politically savvy underlings is the way to go. He isn't as clueless as old Ned but if you gave him a Varys he'd absolutely dominate.

Stannis succeeds or fails purely on the virtue of his underlings. Without loyal, cunning followers willing to lie to their king he'd fall inside a year

How is this even a question?

I didnt mean he would be bad, he would just be boring. No great works or reforms would happen under King Stannis. Probably what Westeros needs right now though.

>Chronic Diarrhea

youtube.com/watch?v=QmKhGqWcJGY

I, for one, am cheering for the snow zombies.

I defeated your uncle Victarion and his Iron Fleet off Fair Isle, the first time your father crowned himself. I held Storm's End against the power of the Reach for a year, and took Dragonstone from the Targaryens. I smashed Mance Rayder at the Wall, though he had twenty times my numbers. Tell me, turncloak, what battles has the Bastard of Bolton ever won that I should fear him?