How lewd do your games get...

I mean, I'm running a literal ERP game. It's smuttier than literal pornography.

I introduced a digital bunraku parlor in my game once. I very awkwardly mentioned how one of the player characters was expected by the spider of the host to engage the ladies whose time he bought sexually.
Needless to say it was a bad experience all around, remind me to never thoughtlessly insert potentially lewd content again.
Usually I just stick to mentioning how the PCs intrude on some compromising scene if I want to paint an NPC as "liberated"

It's dangerous to go alone, user. Take this.

There have been no major updates since the last time this was posted, although I did change whether or not the spell Find Traps works "like that". Now it does.

source?

Japan.

...

>a bard is about to join my campaign
you are a blessing for this user, thank you

I was part of a campaign where my lesbian friend was being constantly, and I mean CONSTANTLY harassed by this dude who just didn't get it. She eventually approached me and asked to help her out, since we knew each other back in high-school and she didn't want to break up the group (it was a consistent group of six people, who only had this one issue).
So, somehow, my lawful good paladin began to hit on the chaotic evil sorceress.
At first, it was mostly harassment, me telling her that she must redeem herself, her trying to get me to fall to her god.
Back and forth, we kept harassing each-other at every turn. Soon, the words became softer, more teasing than actual demands, and eventually it became more playful with just a hint of playfulness.
We eventually rationalized why we were trying to hit it off with someone so diametrically opposed to us. I was convinced there was good in her and she just needed to show it to become a better person, and she became convinced that i was capable of so much more than merely serving law and order.
After courting for nearly eight sessions, which was about six months of campaign time, we decided to get married, just to make it official and really tell the other guy to back off.
After that, it became more of a running joke, with party members on night-watch duty being forced to hear the paladin and sorceress shout at each-other angrily and toss around in their shared tent, one determined to make the other see their way of alignment.
Over all, it was a fun expierence, but it was reliant on the fact that i was close friends with someone who knew my personality well enough to not take things to far, and the party went along with it because most of them thought it was hilarious to introduce the evil cult the sorceress served to her lawful good paladin holding his son, a newborn baby with an abyssal bloodline.
So, depends, but if they allow it, I think lewd and general flirting can add a lot to a campaign.

...

Prison School.

>Degenerates: Anyone who does anything in life except work and pray and die

You don't have to defend your lifestyle to me user, but you will have to answer to Jesus.

>posts shitty webcomic
>recognizes shitty webcomic

Fuck you and fuck me too.

...

I do what I can.

Here's what I have for monsters so far, if you're interested:
- Alraune
- Tentacle demon
- Nymph
- Philotes ("divine succubus")
- A 5e conversion for Malcanthet, Queen of Succubi (shifting her to NE instead of CE, since succubi have likewise shifted to NE from CE)

...

Sauce?

>sexual fetishes
>floor tiles

I couldn't resist. Admittedly, I didn't even try to.

>Base seduction DC based on Strength or Dexterity
>not constitution the stat literally defining health

>disgunnabegud.jpg

Tablefucking. It's our fault for using this as the premise.

You sound like real faggots.

Thanks for bringing that shit back to my mind, user

...

>tfw you'll never get to play in a lewd game

Me and my friends all rolled up barbarians and our weekly game consists of the gm (girl) introducing an excuse to get to some locale where she introduces a female Npc for us to rape

>charmed condition not giving advantage
>Sex not breaking concentration
>pulling out imposing disadvantage on pregnancy check not a paltry -2
>deus vult grants bonus to satisfaction not impregnation
>not mentioning Mage hand
>all that "you're a sicko"-talk
doyouevendndbro.gif

Personally I think the mythical country of "Ohio" to be a far better fetish than "Floor tiles"

>>pulling out imposing disadvantage on pregnancy check not a paltry -2
Pulling out is unsettlingly reliable IRL I've used this method probably a hundred times with an ex and never got them pregnant

...

I play with my wife (it's how I met her).
Usually it's normal stuff, but sometimes our solo games end up being more like porny fantasy novel things.
I ran a game of the Dresden Files RPG with her and she basically played one of the series many sexed-up monster chicks and the whole thing turned into a pornoriffic fuckfest.

>consensual sex in the missionary position with the lights off between a married man and a woman for the purpose of procreation
Best fetish. Fuck you user, i read the whole damn thing

Everything is implied besides OOC jibes because we are so adult. Remember the part of the 7 Harry Potter where Hermione and Harry are alone together for months and have that heavy moment where they dance, like you can't tell me that two teenagers alone together for months in an adrenaline pumping chase for there lives and all they do is just dance. But they just dance, enough said,

...go on

You've given me a lot to think about, user. Having said that, remember that I am trying to keep things as simple as possible, considering that I'm making what amounts to a sex mini-game. I said right at the start that "ease of play" trumps real life.

Concentration being broken during sex is definitely something that should be brought up.

>not mentioning Mage hand

I generally tried to bring up spells only if they would directly interact with the new rules in some way. Mage Hand is just groping at a distance, that doesn't need to be specifically covered.

>Best fetish

Dwarves agree.

The original formula was actually:

([Strength or Dexterity] + Constitution + Charisma) ÷ 3

However some user yelled at me over this, since the whole point of 5e is "simplify, simplify, simplify", and stupid equations like the above is precisely what it's trying to avoid. Additionally, I wanted something that would be quick and easy to determine just by looking at a monster or NPC's stat block. So now it's just 10 + Str/Dex + Cha.

I actually would have liked to include Constitution, but I feel that if I do then the seduction DCs climb to high to be feasible.

In my current game, two players have had their characters fade to black recently.

So, aside from playing some awkward flirting because we are all murderhobos, the game is actually going pretty well, because no one is actually ERPing in public, which would kill the campaign very quickly.

Though there has been a con check to see if the female elf would get preggers now, so there's that.

I have to back pedal a bit: Concentration should be broken by sex and foreplay _unless_ the concentrated on spell is used for sex or foreplay. Otherwise your "Turn to stone" and "Black Hentacles" don't work, which would be a shame, because I like your approach of adding properties to spells.

Also, have you considered adding Performance to the skills usable to seduce? Stripping, belly dancing, massaging and pottery (so you can Patrick Swayze it up) come to mind.

Why not 10(or 8, because spell save DC) +CON+CHA? Even simpler. Female asset generator agrees.

Good ideas on both counts.

Because I feel that Strength and/or Dexterity should also play a role, and in the balance between Str/Dex or Con, I favor Str/Dex.

What's the "female asset generator"? I mean, I'm going to Google it anyway, I guess...

If I ever do I hope to god they don't expect me to read a 3rd party book in order to know how to use a dick

My male character got raped by a female gang leader in a homebrew fallout game

A character of mine once raped a woman literally to death, and it wasn't even the worst thing he ever did.

Evil campaigns amirite?

...

>Mage hand
Well, in the Book of Vile Deeds (or whatever it was called) for 3.5, it had an alternate version of mage hand that gave tactile feedback. Which I thought was pretty funny, because OF COURSE horny young mages who just learnt mage hand instantly tried to get feedback from it.

Not a criticism or anything, just something the post reminded me of.

If you go along with it, do you have a lessened chance of being killed by a zeroa? Asking for a friend.

1d4chan.org/wiki/D20_female_asset_generator

I do acknowledge your feelings. Scientifically speaking, though, health is and has always been, regardless of culture, the trait people find attractive.
On the other hand, if you try to incorporate a system for handling personal preferences for bulkiness (STR or thicc-ness) or leanness (DEX or hungry skelly mode) per NPC, having a choice of attributes is perfect. I mean if NPC John Smith likes muscles, STR-focused PCs should probably have an easier time seducing him, whereas nimble rogues would have a harder time. Might get out of hand though...

>Cecaelian prince called "Nimron"
>Grown men laugh for 10 minutes Prince Nimrod
>My Bard swaggers up to seal the peace talks
>Can't think of anything to say
>Sperg out "Wouldn't mind if you use those tentacles somewhere else handsome"
>get 17 plus charisma bonuses
>Have to end session because we cannot contain hysterics

Hello, fellow patrician

hey Ménage a Trois is pretty good

Hermoine is a pure virgin and did NOT fuck Harry fwiw.

All the above is fine and well, but if the Actual Girl keeps steering your character into erp, it's because she wants the d. Are you at all interested?

Idk her IRL, we play on Roll20, different sides of the country. Also, I have an actual IRL girlfriend and I'm worried that this lewd RP might go too far and spoil things with me and my GF if I don't get it under control

>How lewd do your games get?
quite
>Does this happen to anyone else?
yes
>Is this normal?
no
>are you the dm
yes
>are you in pain
yes i am

Paladin's sex power is both hideously overpowered and amazingly named.

Deus Vult will satisfy their partner literally everytime past level 3-4.

Entirely accurate when you think about it. Why do you imagine so many female succubi end up going monogamous after snootling on a paladong?

>nice milf
>does she get fucked reverse-cowgirl?

Just be honest about not being comfortable with it. Problem solved.

No, although I will admit my current game is the lewdest I've ever been in. (I recently discovered that literally everyone else is ERPing during downtime, and I was excluded because pic related.)

hot.

>How lewd do your games get?
I only had one lewd moment in 3 years of DMing when I decided to make a centaur NPC have massive tits
players had fun
we were all uncomfortable afterwards and ever spoke of it again
I did kick a guy out once though for bringing up sex too much though he was also an ordained and literal minster of atheism so I bet you can guess what kind of cancer he was

>Anyone who does anything
triggered degenerate

Hot webcam sessions incoming

Sure, but the side-effect is that you have less uses of it later in the day for when you might really need it, and the only real effect of satisfying someone for the paladin is gaining advantage on Persuasion checks with the NPC.

Likewise, their second ability ("Sexual Healing") is different from most other classes in that it doesn't let them gain any extra per-day uses of abilities, like how the druid gets an extra Wild Shape, or the fighter an extra Action Surge. Instead, the paladin's Sexual Healing feature is just a mass lay-on-hands, and Deus Vult merely helps them guarantee that they'll be able to apply Sexual Healing to the people they're having sex with.

And now, a song:
youtube.com/watch?v=eA4_O3oeJCw

(Incidentally, it is totally intentional that the various sexual features of classes makes it beneficial for the party to constantly engage in orgies with one another, before or after an expected fight)

Eh...I like things as they are now, since among other things it makes it easy to have the Bard's Checklist at the back.

Depends on the zeroa, I guess. They are Evil, after all - and stupid - but personal ruling would be that in the choice between good sex and killing, the zeroa chooses sex (I did say that some zeroa might spare their victims so that they can be raped again in the future). It can kill and rape anyone, after all, but it wouldn't often find someone willing to help get it off, and if you leave it extremely satisfied, you do get advantage on Persuasion checks against it, remember...although on that note I just realized that "enduring" doesn't do too much for the NPC zeroa, so I'm adding this ability:

>Insatiable: Satisfaction checks made against the zeroa have disadvantage.

If you're curious, by the way, the zeroa's name comes form the Hebrew word for "tentacle", which is "זְרוֹעַ" according to Google translate, which can be rendered as ZROA, ZRUA, or ZRVA.

>hehe look at me being subversive
. .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
\_________/

Did they really mislabel Michigan on that map? I never noticed before. I wonder if it's on all of them

>former party member comes back as an antagonist brainwashed by the big bad.

you're underage?

That actual girl wants the D

I live in Ohio, please send help

Nah, my character is. Kinda, it's a long story.

The paladin got raped by succubi (male), but that was his fault for waltzing into their lair unarmed and with his pants down without the rest of us. Another paladin worships the patron goddess of prostitutes and a priestess in the party is one of his followers. Yet another paladin was raped by the god(dess) of whimsy and left him with the child.

Chain of events that lead to yuor raping?

The concept still seems very contrived. If a PC wants to seduce someone, I'll set a DC based on DMG pg 245 and my own judgement. If I absolutely needed a stat-based DC, I'd have 10 + proficiency bonus (maybe double for legendary creatures) + highest ability modifier, which is more in line with how most other opposed ability check DCs are calculated.

As you like. I'm hardly posting this as the One True Way. This is just My Way, and my justifications for it. I prefer My Way because it seems less arbitrary to me, but if you prefer things Your Way, there's nothing terribly wrong with that.

I do think it takes some of the fun out of things, though, if the seduction DC is calculated based on the strictly standard formula, rather than something that at least makes a nod towards a creature's physical appearance and personal magnetism.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=udjS5yhtT8I

Depends on the players, One game people got uncomfortable with clothed fondling, another we got to full on ERP.

Are players bad at RP if they can't put aside their spergy tendencies to acknowledge that sex exists and is a thing people do?

Not really, sessions have a limited time so what you decide to highlight is important.
If someone can play only 4-5 hours a week, they don't really want to focus on stuff that makes them feel uncomfortable.

OP i'd be doing you a disservice if I didn't tell you she wants to fuck. Aside from that, ERPing is gross to me, and most players who desperately want to fuck in tabletop games are usually slimy dudes, and i will NEVER give them masturbation material. That being said, one of my favorite intros to a campaign was my human ranger trying really hard to fuck an elf. My other friend's elf barbarian didn't wanna put up with that shit, so he set the bar on fire. And then it spread to half the city, including the orphanage next door.

>tying each other up with our 50ft hempen ropes during down time, groping each other every time we move past each other's tokens, constant CONSTANT dirty talk, absolutely filthy.
>It's not something happening off hand in the game, our characters are practically fucking. We don't ERP.
You already are ERP'ing, just not RP'ing sex.

I wouldn't say they're bad at RP. It's hard for many people to get into character during sex if everyone at the table is a guy for example.

The sexy witch of the group is probably getting raped by a cultist.
And he's not gonna be gentle...

Sexuakity in generall is a big theme in our games.
We had multiple Orgies (in the old roman sence but still), 1 cult centered around the animalistic side of humans (including really dirty sex), 1 sexy vampire, a fat raping cultist who tortured some of her boyfrieds to death ...

in retrospect ... we're fucked up people.

Well, In the last session our Rockstar Bard tried to mac on the fighter, but it turns out he was gay and spurned her advances. That's the closest we get to lewd.

We are playing a iron age- viking esque sort of game where my character is going to marry her girlfriend. Sexy stuff is heavily implied and it seems most of the NPCs are some flavour of Bi. But none of it ends up being explicit since we are 4 reg guys, one Asexual chap who is triggered by the very thought of turgid flesh and my gf. Sooo... Not too much lewd.

Rolling for sexuality should be a d100 roll with gay on 1 or 100 desu

Homosexuality is a bit more common in the real world than a mere 2% chance. Actually from what I can tell it tends to be a 4% chance in the Anglosphere, though this might be due to a cultural rejection of homosexuality - for example, San Francisco, Seattle, Minneapolis, Atlanta, and Boston all have a homosexual community that comprises more than 10% of their population, or at least that was the case in a 2005 survey. Likewise California has a gay population that's about 8% of their total population.

Something something liberal agenda, although I'd point out that what we'd today call "homosexuality" was a lot more prevalent in ancient Greece, Rome, and other such civilizations, none of which could really be called "liberal" (but then again it wasn't really "homosexual", either - they had different standards). The modern Jewish, Christian, and Muslim stance on homosexuality really does seem to ultimately stem from an ancient Hebrew hangup about homosexuality. $5 says some guy stood up Moses and he took it personal.

Regardless, as I said at the start of the document, the point is ease of play, not a strict adherence to reality. Part of "ease of play" means ensuring that any gay characters rolled up have a reasonable chance at actually getting to make use of it.