You discovered that the sweet cripple girl NPC your party got to know very well and connected with...

She was hiding something and we never truly properly connected and knew her if she was a secret villain for months. I'm hurt because I was lied to by my "little sister", and also I've probably lost something to the apocalypse machine. I kill her tearfully if she refuses to end and atone for her actions at once, and we will never have the same relationship if she does.

Is there a japshit cartoon that we're supposed to know the plotline of and refer to when posting, or are we free to make up our own fluff

Because I would like to know more details about the apocalyptic technomagic construct, specifically how the two are linked (radio controls via joysticks, psychic projection, telemphathy, dream projection, etc.).

First thing is find out why, then we can see if it's possible to align our interests. If not, she has to be dealt with.

Rape her.

Same, this interests me.

Personally I don't think I could bring myself to kill someone I love, but I'd try to get her to stop for sure.

>First response is to kill her

no japshit show in particular. Let's say she is connected via cables which are jacked to her spine/nervous system.

>I kill her tearfully if she refuses to end and atone for her actions at once, and we will never have the same relationship if she does.

It's literally my second response.

It's a game after all. Our party will get a lot of exp for such powerful being.

Basically this. It's a tragedy, but the most reasonable option is to kill her quickly, mercifully and entirely by surprise.

No, it's not a tragedy. It's an opportunity for a wheelchair, maybe some medications. She can't be that tough in close range combat, she's a fucking cripple. KILL MAIM LOOOOOOOOT!

YFW when she's dying in you arms after you yank her out of her ruined construct.

Her life isn't worth the hundreds the golem will likely kill, especially if she doing this intentionally

She is

We've bonded under false pretenses and she's doing a shitty thing of her own volition. If there's some hidden motivation that makes it more sympathetic/makes her easier to reason with, we take that angle. If there isn't, kill her and cry about it in therapy.

Depends. Is she laying waste to parts of the country that we never liked anyway?

If it's been laying waste to it for months and we've done nothing about it then we clearly don't care about these parts of the country a whole lot.

First question: why is she making the construct destroy and kill? If her reasoning is sympathetic, I'll try to talk her down. If it's not, then I'm killing her on the spot before her murder-golem can stop me.

Sure, she seemed nice at first, but then I found out she's been committing cold-blooded murder for months. There's no tragedy here, only bitterness that such a sweet thing was just a mask for something ugly, and anger at myself for letting the girl fool me for so long.

you and cripple girl spend the afternoon together and have a wonderful time. You watch the sunset together and she will cherish this experience forever. She starts to cry and says that because of your time together, it renewed her convictions. She smiles at you as the construct materializes in front of you and she gets on board and flies off.

During the time spent with the girl, my character slipped a tiny explosive charge onto the back of her neck.

I detonate it.

1. Try to talk her down. Failing that,
2. Take her out of the picture covertly and forcefully. What exactly you try to do depends on how edgy you are. If this proves impossible,
3. Disable the construct outside of combat, or somehow make it useless. From a purely utilitarian standpoint this is a great way to not get a lot of people killed destroying it. Failing this,
4. Rally the resources to destroy the fucker head on. You were going to do this anyway.

Came here to post this.

Cripple the construct.

NO LEGS FOR YOU

The only afternoon I'm spending with her, after what I've learned now, is an afternoon spent burning her corpse and scattering the ashes.

I'm actually going to need a backstory.

You're going to need to tell me why she is doing what she is doing. If she has a compelling reason then the party might be merciful. If she's just "hurr I'm crippled and angry at the world" then whoops, surprise neck surgery, you won't be needing your esophagus anymore.

ANOTHER SACRIFICE
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD
SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE

I lobotomize the girl.

We face the mighty construct and take it out, through strength or wit, or both.

Little crippled girls are hardly worthy opponents.

...

I knock the chair over.

we ride the spanking bus to a magical realm

This is why I come to Veeky Forums for the common sense.

The important thing here is to determine why she's doing this - is it just from a desire to cause destruction or from hatred or similar, or is there a deeper reason?
The why must be determined first, then a solution devised from there.

No need. She broke the NAP. Kill her and take the chair.

Then use the technomagical artifact to provide 'protection' to the nations of the world for a bery reasonable monthlu subscription.

You guys are willing to stop being friends with people for pettier reasons than this, of course you kill the girl.

Mindbreak her into doing our bidding, duh by liberally using drugs, rape and headpats.

Now we've got the construct under our control. I mean, what could possibly go wrong with relying on a deranged mindbroken puppet of a human for controlling an Apocalyptic Technomagical construct that has been laying waste to the country for months?

Unless there's a legitimate reason for the giant robot rampages (such as preventing something worse from happening), yes.
Thus why you need to know why she's doing it first.

Murderers don't get a free pass just for having physical disabilities.

I take away the controls to her robot, detain her, and make her answer to the victims and their loved ones.

>skipping leg day

Also he's killer (accidental), not murderer (intentional).

I'd feel bad about it, but a servant of Pelor's gotta do what a servant of Pelor's gotta do.

At least it wasn't rape or some other Slaanesh bullshit

Being motivated by profit makes you neutral evil, not lawful evil.

Remove the ramp leading to the cockpit, replace it with a flight of stairs.

>Get her to lay waste to another country that we aren't fond of.
>Take advantage of the destruction for economic gain.

Burgers pls.

Is there a Paladin in the party? Because that just means smite evil is gonna happen.

Paladins are just murderous smiterobots anyway.

>implying

People aren't equal. A cute waifu with a giant robot is worth significantly more than whatever worthless chaff she's killing.

Stand up from the table to step out of this Cliche clusterfuck of a game?

When you are in love with the "BBEG"

how the fuck long have you known this character for you to be treating her like a little sister? that's fucking creepy. humans don't fucking bond that quickly.

and if it's because the game has had some unrealistic passage of time and the dm is telling you that your character would feel this way about her, tell him to fuck off for using the oldest, dumbest, laziest drama device possible.

Beat, rape and generally humiliate her. Tie her up and drag her from the back of horse through the wake of destruction. Send heralds so people can come and spit on her, beat her with shoes etc.
Finally hang, draw and quarter. Send her remains to be piked and displayed above the entrances to the larger settlements.

Kill her and be done with it

...

How is it edgy?
It seems pretty just for all the misery she's caused and serves as a warning to the next.

Rape is always edgy, dude

And public humiliation on that scale is Roman-tier shitlordery

Why is this an issue? She's killed countless people, devastated the livelyhood of many, many more and she lied to me and the party at the very least be negletgting to mention that she's also a murderous psychopath.
Barring interference from the construct she's dead. Since restraining her obviously has no influence on the construct it's literally the only way to make sure there will be no more victims outside of maybe lobotomizing her, which isn't much different.

>Rape is always edgy, dude

I don't see how, in this context it's obviously being used as part of a punishment.

>And public humiliation on that scale is Roman-tier shitlordery

It needs to be a big spectacle so that the people can revel in it after the months of hardship and fear.

>When you are in love with the "BBEG"
...you put her out of her misery. That's the right thing to do.

>a punishment
I know that, still edgy. "Hurr durr we should punish her pussy"

>big spectacle
just execute her with a public hanging or something, jeez louise.

I mean, I'd rather not risk her construkt fucking everything up while we cart her around the country and set up elaborate rape-fests. Murder is a cleaner solution.

>I know that, still edgy. "Hurr durr we should punish her pussy"

How is it edgy though? It's obviously acknowledging that rape is something bad, hence why we inflict it on the heinous criminal.

>just execute her with a public hanging or something, jeez louise.

Why? The people who she terrorised should have a right to enact some small retribution of their own and a precedent needs to be set that we won't tolerate this kind of behavior.

At least make it like an ironic punishment instead of something as trite as public rape.
Also, hope you've got that summon thing on lockdown. It'd be shitty if that reappeared while you got your bone on repeatedly.

Maybe because I don't particularly think that rape is one of those heinous crimes that should be inflicted by the good guys, desu

>retribution

If seeing her dead doesn't sate them, I dunno what can.

>we won't tolerate this kind of behavior
I'd think that "not creating magical deathbots intent on ravaging civilization" is sort of a universally agreed-upon unspoken contract. It should not require a reminder.
And, honestly, if that shit becomes a regular occurance you have bigger problems than what can be solved by public punishment.

And make the staircase one of those spiral one with tiny steps.

>At least make it like an ironic punishment instead of something as trite as public rape.

I never said it was public rape. The party would rape her and generally humiliate her. The ironic part of her punishment would be having to follow her own trail of destruction and letting the people she hurt hurt her.

>Also, hope you've got that summon thing on lockdown.

The nature of the construct was never specified. If it can simply appear from thin air wherever she wants and she can control it mentally from any distance no matter her state of mind then sure, just killer her. But that's the worst possible case in a scenario never described.

>Maybe because I don't particularly think that rape is one of those heinous crimes that should be inflicted by the good guys, desu

Death is worse than rape and yet good guys do it all the time.

>If seeing her dead doesn't sate them, I dunno what can.

Suffering, then death. Maybe we can even set up a holiday where effigies of her are brutalized every year.

They have to know that they're not beyond a grisly fate.

>death is worse than rape

hoo boy, I understand where you come from now

no helping ya, and arguing will just go in a circle, since you don't believe that rape is worse than death

>suffering then death, public effigies, such and such

(pic related)

>Maybe we can even set up a holiday where effigies of her are brutalized every year.
See? That's creative. Way better than boring rape.
Villianize her for the next couple of centuries. Make it so that a millenium down the road children will still sing ryhmes about her being a terrible monster while they go around looking for tiny chocolate wheelchairs underneath burning effigies of her.

It is at times like these that I am reminded that a great deal of the users of Veeky Forums are literally autists/spergburgers

You believe rape is worse than death?
Why? How?

>See? That's creative. Way better than boring rape.

I doesn't have to be one or the other.

Because I'd rather take exiting from this plane of existence, and not existing forever/going to an afterlife, than a life of psychological scarring and physical therapy.

Even if the girl is going to die soon, it's still a crime worse than murder

>Because I'd rather take exiting from this plane of existence, and not existing forever/going to an afterlife, than a life of psychological scarring and physical therapy.

So you suggest that anyone who has ever been raped should kill themselves.
And yet somehow I'm the edgy one.

Wheel her into the authorities, give them the evidence, collect reward. End game.

>suggesting everyone who has been raped should kill themselves

bit of a leap there, don'tcha think? I'm simply explaining why I think rape is a worse crime than murder.

I CAN have personal standards that I don't think should be enforced, y'know.

>bit of a leap there, don'tcha think?

Not at all, you say oblivion is better than living with being raped. Thus you must think it would be better if rape victims simply killed themselves.

People can and do recover from rape, but never from death. Thus murder is worse than rape.

>oblivion is better than being raped

yes

for me

I don't think you quite understand, I PERSONALLY feel that rape is one of the most heinous crimes that you could commit, so yes, I would rather die than get raped. This colors my perception of said heinousness of the crime, and the severity of rape.

It may be not outright immoral for the severely distressed victims of grave injuries to kill themselves dead, yeah.

But not for rational people.
If you visited death row and offered them the chair or getting raped, do you think most people would really take the chair?

How you personally feel informs your decisions. I dare you to go to a rape victim, look them in the eyes and tell them that you feel they should kill themselves.
If you feel strongly enough that you would rather then this should be easy.

That's their choice.

>that they should kill themselves

I think that you're making several logical fallacies with this insistence of yours, but I forget the name

Again, I never said anyone should kill themselves because of what happened to them, I'm not them, I don't make their decisions. I'm saying that I would. And that's my reasoning behind why rape is worse than death.

You can survive rape.

You can't survive death.

..... and?

I am well aware of this fact
Everyone is

>I think that you're making several logical fallacies with this insistence of yours

I am not. You said rape is worse than murder.
Thus you must believe that the outcome of rape is worse than the outcome of murder.
The outcome of murder is death, so you must believe that death is preferable to living having being raped.

If death is preferable to having to live with having being raped then people who have been raped should choose to death.

Hold up

you really can't differentiate between "stuff I believe that I would do" and "stuff I believe that other people should do"

.... How the fuck do you even function in society with that kind of binary thinking?

>you really can't differentiate between "stuff I believe that I would do" and "stuff I believe that other people should do"

I can, but you specifically said the crime of rape is worse than that of murder. You didn't say "I would rather die than be raped."

You mentioned the crime, which is dictated by society and not an individual. If you would personally choose to be murdered rather than raped then you're just a fool. But by saying the crime of rape is worse than crime of murder you project your view on society.

Aren't the actions that are being taken to "punish" the little girl put into place by the PCs? I.E., me?

Should I not let my views be projected in the punishment?

(Also, isn't the general consensus that rape is worse than murder?)

The issue here is that you called me edgy for saying murder is worse than rape, not the scenario.

>Also, isn't the general consensus that rape is worse than murder?

No, are you an idiot?

No, I called you edgy for using rape as a "punishment"

>an idiot

we're all idiots, have you forgotten what site we're on?

But the majority of people I know IRL, when that subject is inevitably brought up at some point or another, have chosen rape over death in terms of severity.

>The girl is doing this of her own free will.
That's easy mode, then.
Kill her. Kill her now.

>No, I called you edgy for using rape as a "punishment"

You did, then I brought up the point of murder being worse than rape and you called me edgy and unreasonable for that.

>But the majority of people I know IRL, when that subject is inevitably brought up at some point or another, have chosen rape over death in terms of severity.

You must know some real fucktards then. Check out the laws of most countries, murder is universally punished more severely than rape.

And if rape was seen as worse thand eath by a majority you'd probably see >50% of rape victims committing suicide. It's not anywhere close to that.

>unreasonable
I didn't call you unreasonable for that, I called you unreasonable for your insistence that I said something I didn't/misinterpretation of my statement.

>fucktards

how is someone a fucktard for thinking rape is worse? It changes their life forever, and unlike murder, they have to live with the aftereffects.