Let's say that's Horus tripped over a rock and died or something. Who would have made a better Warmaster? The Lion, Sanguinius, or Guilliman? Try to be honest here and not just base this on who you like.
The options are the Lion, Guilliman, or Sanguinius. I pick Sanguinius.
Other urls found in this thread:
I'd like to say Daddy's Little Angel, but probably Bobby G. He's the most down to earth, the other two are too passionate
The Lion would be the obvious pick, he was almost equal in his tactical prowess and was renowned for his wisdom. Guilliman works better as a statesman than warmanster and Sanguinius is charismatic but not a war leader.
Prooobably Gulliman. While Lion and Angel are better fighters than Robert, Robert has a better overall, big picture analytical mind than the other two.
Then again, we see what happens when you put Big Bob in charge. He decides the best wayto keep mankind from dividing is to divide mankind.
Also is that Triple H on the left?
My main issue with the Lion is that he's terrible at personal anything. Warmaster means getting your armies to do what you say and I feel like the Lion would have pissed too many of his brothers off. Sanguinius could have gotten people to work together but he would have brought the other two in for council to make sure the plans were going as needed.
Idk but that picture is fucking jorridnthe more I look at it.
Dem goldy locks on Horus....
KeK
Honestly there is only 2 primarchs that should have been seriously considered for the job, Gulliman and Alpharius/Omegon.
Gulliman is the master of logistics and bureaucracy, which is what builds empires and makes them last. And Alpharius was easily the greatest strategist of the primachs.
The only option would be Ferrus. Everyone else was too involved with politics between each other, or too focused on their niche. Ferrus would have just done the job and got it done.