How do we fix them?

>make them hold hands alot!
You sick twisted fuck.

It's about ethics in game journalism and putting uppity whores where they belong, user.

See, that's why Gamergate failed. You have good ideas, but then you people came and mixed everything up with misogyny.

>select all images with trees

kek

But I don't hate women, just whores.

Also,
>failed
Considering how it indirectly set the cultural stage for a bunch of LARPing neonazis to meme a property mogul into the white house, I say it did anything but fail.
Perhaps even succeeded too well.

...by making it appeal to pedophiles?

Did you mistake that for some little girl cosplaying cestree? Because it looks like patrician 2d to me.

See? You're the alt-right. Go back to /pol/, you Nazi scum

Less tots
More bott

Nein, mein Freund

>Very, very obviously meant to resemble a little girl, both in clothing and body proportions
>But she's definitely not a little girl and jerking off to her definitely doesn't make me a pedo and if you suggest she looks like a little girl you're delusional

Fapping to something that's supposed to represent a little girl is still pedophilia.

...

I know, right? I remember being all "oh yeah man I'm tired of not being able to trust reviews and all the major sites all hopping on publishers' dicks and reviewers giving biased scores based on politics and shit!" and then they were like "yeah and so that's why some literally who indie dev is a total whore and SJWs are ruining gaming" and then it kinda lost its luster.

Golden Girl

>They play games, but they're not symbols

Cestree is ideal Veeky Forums.
Knowledgeable but humble, kind, helpful, loves games and always wants to learn more about them.

Ribbon is actual Veeky Forums.
Arrogant, spiteful, an insufferable know-it-all who might not actually know all that much, but once every so often does something to make you smile.

Thanks. It was gonna bother me.

Loli is still pedophilic man

I mean do you at the end of the day but if something looks and acts like a child. Y'know?

That's how /pol/fags work, they deny deny deny because they're the true criminals of Veeky Forums.

are you telling me little girls have that kind of bodankadonk?
She's wider than most of the girls after sophmore split in my region.
Where do you fucking live where ladies have hips wider than their shoulders pre-puberty?

>damage control

>getting this embarrassed you get your idea of a woman's body from anime
I don't see the point.

???????????????????????

Give a bit of boobflesh from cestree to Ribbon

>Three fucking years later
>Losers on both sides still can't get over gg

my goodness, you're right. since no artist has ever drawn a character of any age with exaggerated or inaccurate proportions, we can safely say this character isn't a little girl at all! her hips are simply too wide - there's simply no possible way she was ever intended to look like a child.

I remember getting into it because I cared about the truth, and getting out of it because the mob cared about sticking it to social justice. It went from "you're lying to us! we demand honesty!" to "you're an actual paedophile lmao! here's unverified hearsay to prove it!" to doing all the unethical shit we were supposed to be fighting.
too much staring into the abyss, I guess.

If the artist intended that to look like a child and not some kind of weird age-play shit, they really suck at anatomy.

I guess it'd be a real shame for your argument if there were readily available examples of deliberately exaggerated anatomy in this very thread, wouldn't it? something to act as an on-hand reminder that artists sometimes deliberately oversexualise their drawings.
especially if it were somewhere prominent like the OP.
yeah, that'd be a real shame.

I am just a smugphile

So your argument is it's a little girl with grown woman proportions.

whatever helps you sleep at night kiddo.

Okay.

You fucking /pol/fags will all go to jail

I am a third party who came in to correct yall about your frankly alien ideas of what children look like.

Go to bed, Ribbon.

You don't happen to know the vintage on that fine image do you good sir?

>you will go to jail for thoughtcrime
Refrain from stepping

>How do we fix them?
We could ask the "artist" to stop spamming them. Japanese Bird Cooking Spaghetti was at least cute.

>/pol/tards casting their own bait
Pretty sad!

>""
>implying they're not cute

You've got a lot of salt.

She's a succubus. She can't help it.

vivan isnt really a alt-right symbol.

Even out how much tit each has (medium is best, cowtits and flatfucks get out) and then give them less one-dimensional personalities.

it's not that they arnt over it, it's just the new scub, same as SJWs vs anti-feminists or neo-nazis vs antifa. its just scub now

I think it's sad how the "misogyny" thing just became widely accepted fact. Just goes to show that the fifth estate is way more powerful than you and a "consumer revolt" means nothing if you don't have any big guns in building your narrative.

>Be borderline /pol/ classical liberal
>That shitty test classifies me as authoritarian left

Yeah, I guess "to each according to their need, from each according to their ability" is inherently isn't a bad idea, does that make me a commie? Because I believe the phrase sounds like a nice utopia that's unattainable because fuck the government? Fucking hell this test sucks.

>libertarian
>banning things
hardcore college campus sjw's are authoritarian in their desire to root out inconvenient facts

Yes she is.

>to each according to their need, from each according to their ability

user, that phrase forms the bases of socialism

I can see that idea developing for my eyes.
Gamergate is popular with counter-culture youtubers, counter culture youtubers are the voice for anti-sjw, anti-sjw's are cozied up to by racists, racists appropiate the alternative right.
It's sort of a guilt by associating thing.
Plus, there's a big willingness to villify gamergate so not a lot of proof is needed.

I don't think you understand what a classical liberal is. Do you just really like freedom of speech?

in today's stupid political discourse "classical liberalism" means just a bit left of center, so i think he means that

>By leaving the past where it belongs. Nostalgia cannot be fixed, it already benefits from being safe and comfortable.
Honestly this.

Replace them with something more fitting.

I think the term is "spaying"

I know, it's just that the question is really awkwardly phrased. I don't think you'll find anyone who disagrees with it as an abstract idea, just the ability of the government to enforce it.

I think I do. I'm using it to disassociate myself from the American definition of liberal (because calling the side of the spectrum that wants the most government intervention liberal makes perfect sense over there for some reason).

clasicall liberal means right libertarian, are you a libertarian?

>clasicall liberal means right libertarian
Show me where you find this equivocation, because I can't find it anywhere. The closest I can get is the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy calling libertarianism the most extreme form of classical liberalism.

But to satisfy your curiosity: no, I'm not a libertarian. While I do believe that the state should ideally be as restrictive as possible, I do not see it as a legal monopoly that needs to be abolished.

Classical liberals belived that the state should only upkeep the army, police force and fire fighters, while the market takes cear of the rest, it's the "state as the night watchman" idea. It goose as far as to say that parents cant force their children to do anything because they do not own them, but at the same time have no obligation to feed and take care of them (this was of course a thought experiment and should not be taken 100% seriously). What is known as "classical liberal" today, is being a liberal but not agreeing with the democratic party in the usa

Ebin

If by liberal you mean National Socialist then sure...

Real national socialism has never been tried

you leave vivian alone. she's one of the only good things to come out of the whole business.

it was seriously a huge problem. everyone was yelling about journalism and integrity and nepotism, and they were right to do that, but some of them were also yelling everything from bitter nonsense about women to actual holocaust denial. I don't think a month went by without some prominent gamergate character saying something indefensible.
like, there was a time when the guy from Disturbed got interested, but he got decidedly un-interested when he discovered just how much /pol/ hates jews. ironically or otherwise, they couldn't put it down for five seconds and it cost gamergate a lot of support.

vivian was before those times and was only ever about video games.

it became accepted because it was true, dude. never as bad as antis wanted you to believe, but it was unquestionably there, and it got worse as time went on. the part of the internet that writes obviously fake greentexts about how they got revenge on their ex-girlfriend found an excuse to yell into the void about how terrible women and women-associates are, and they went for it.
for a long time gamergate wasn't about that for most people, but once gaming websites started picking sides - either doubling down and refusing to change, or saying "oh okay we didn't realise you cared about this, let's get on it" - and actually started adding disclosures and making corrections... there wasn't much point continuing to yell about it. we got as much of what we wanted as was feasible, and that was fine.
then more and more wacknuts started showing up and it was time to go. moderates moved on, radicals remained, and now all that's left is the lowest common denominator "ha ha look at this dumb idiot amirite guys, normies btfo" garbage.

It really was not true. But whatever. I guess I see gamergate as an event that ended eventually, whoever is using the hashtag now.

>more fitting.

...?

have them blacked with a big monstrous black COCK

That didn't work for you or your mom, so I'm not sure about the efficacy.

Worked for both Guts and Alucard.
Getting raped as a child builds character.

As someone who followed GG since it was the Quinnspiracy, I remember that Vivian was made to prove that no, gamers are no "my soggy knees", which makes pic related more sadder since nu-/v/ gets in a riot everytime a game have female protagonist/important NPC (unless they are good waifu-bait), black dudes and/or killing nazis or americans.

god, I wish I could enjoy games without social crusaders like /pol/ and sjws and housewives scared of duh satan butting in.
Like, seriously, there has never been a point when some fucking political movement HASN'T been fucking with my games.

Underrated post.

This.

Gamergate then
>Putting pressure on websites to improve their journalistic standards by targeting advertisers and boycotting the sites.
>Speaking out against the incestuous indie games industry, where journalists would shill their friends' games and shut down anyone who didn't play by their highschool clique rules
>Donating to worthy causes

Gamergate now
>Spamming KANGS memes whenever there's a black character
>Whining about the EVIL WIMMINS every time there's a female character
>Flooding games whose developers disagree with them with bad reviews

I would say less GG and more /v/, I mean for fuck's sake, you can't talk about Wolfenstein and old Call of Duty anymore because it triggers the fucking nazifags so much they start shitpost with Holocaust denial and "muh fuhrer did nofing wong".

Link to test please?

The difference between then and now was about a week.

Vivian was just a mascot, she wasn't there to prove anything.
The notyourshield stuff was there to prove that.
This transformation never happened. If anything gamergate morphed into a group solely concerned with defending itself against allegations of bigotry.

>if you play gta youre a real criminal

Games then:
>ME3 has a gay dude lmao
>lol fuck Russia and them towelheads

Games now:
>dude remember how black German soldiers fought on the Western front in WWI, and whites made up less than half of the British forces?
>haha yeah, reminds me of those black female Nazis!

aaaaaaaaaaaaaand you are proving everyones point. I'd like to remind you that both /v/ and /pol/ had a literal meltdown when they found that that in the new wolfenstein you killed nazis and there is a black cherecter in it

under the losest definition of a meltdown maybe

what losest? /v/ for like two weeks had at least one thred on the first page complaning that "you shoot nazis in wolfenstein because of thouse damn sjws femminists that are taking away are games, whaaa whaaa political corectness is killing us". /v/ and /pol/ have become the very thing they hate in videogames, a bunch of winny crybabaies that want everything to cater to them when they make up like less than 10% of the gaming population

There is so much wrong with this I'm not even sure where to begin

>Spelling mistakes means you're being emotional
>Your counter argument boils down to "I'm not a pedophile for jerking my penis at the imagery of a 12 year old being fucked in the ass by a horse, so if you play violent video games such as GTA you're not a criminal in the making because that would be stupid right?"
>Doesn't understand that the majority of child porn busts have both real CP and Loli/Shotacon
>Doesn't get the translation of Lolicon to English is "Pedophile"
Wew lad, I know it's your life and you can do what you want, but don't deny your a pedophile.

Well, shit. I made a grammatical error in my argument. That makes me look like a hypocrite. So, disregard my argument Micheal and there's no reason for you to be scared of Chris hiding under your bed. You're still a pedophile in my eyes though, user.

>if you get too popular on Veeky Forums, you'll either end up as a hate symbol or as pedophile bait

Oh, Ribbon.

You were always pedo-bait. Unapologetic pedo-bait at that.

Ummm sweetie, go back to

Ribbon is pure! Pure!

I remember people alternating between the idea that gamergate may be alright now but started as a hate movement or that it may have started over legitimate concerns but quickly devolved into a hate movement. Because they needed to react somehow to the overwhelming proof that it was not connected to bigotry at all.
Later they realized that they didn't need to respond to anything at all, if they said gamergate was bad enough nobody could stop them from making it the accepted truth.

Try actually reading what I wrote, mong. Battlefield 1 is a complete misrerpresentation of historical fact that is pandering to non-gamers and spitting on the graves of WWI veterans. Not a single black person fought for the Germans on the Western front and yet in-game 1/4 of German forces are black. Only 1/2 of the British soldiers in the game are white. The cover art and promotional materials for the game prominently feature black and Arab soldiers rather than depicting the overwhelming majority of the people who fought in the war and the people who play the game.

CoD WWII goes a step further with its disgraceful revisionism and has black female Nazis for fuck's sake.

The difference between then and now is the degree to which games have been poisoned with unpalatable ideological propaganda, with the express purpose of belittling, demonizing, and ultimately erasing the identity of people like me, the average gamer, a white heterosexual male.

>CoD WWII goes a step further with its disgraceful revisionism and has black female Nazis for fuck's sake.

Amusingly this will only serve to soften the pop culture image of Nazis.

Smuglo.li get out of here