He's got a point you know
He's got a point you know
Andrew Hill
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Adam Ross
Super broadheads, making the chance of hitting a bone higher and increasing force of impact to forcibly damage/dismantle the skeleton.
Benjamin Parker
Skeletons have DR5 / bludgeoning
Elijah Anderson
Blunt force trauma.
Arrows that actually do make contact with the skeleton will still do quite a bit of damage to bones, shattering skulls and destroying limbs.
It's not an ideal weapon, but it's not COMPLETELY ineffective either.
Jace Watson
Well yeah, that's why skellies have resist to piercing since forever?
Cooper Sanchez
Have you not heard of arrowheads being stuck to bones?
>Being this dumb
Alexander Lee
A better question is how can skeletons be destroyed at all. They're animated by necromancy, even if you break the bones to pieces they should still retain their anima.
In fact, I'm pretty sure the skeletal warrior is just there as a psychological misdirection/terror tactic since all you need is just the palm gripping the sword and animate the sword with the dead warriors spirit. It's not like the hand is supported by the skeleton or anything.
Isaiah Gomez
Because if you break the pieces apart, the magic unravels, duh.
Cooper Edwards
The arrows are iron tipped and the iron disrupts the magic animating the skeleton for just long enough to make it collapse.
Kayden Clark
Some arrowheads would do more damage to skeletons than to living humans
Grayson Hernandez
Probably a mix of a finite amount of energy being put in to animate it initially, with more being available or stored in spell components like obsidian to allow prolonged animation, followed by each break either taking more energy to work with keeping it in motion or breaking the flow and containing it in the coherent bit. So the more you break it, the more energy it either spends trying to move the pieces until it uses up what it has, or the harder it is to get energy to the relevant moving bits. Which, admittedly, could probably be worked around by making a higher tier of undead.
Daniel Adams
principle of sympathy
en.wikipedia.org
skeletons work via sympathetic connection with their original human form and movements, so they imitate the form and movement of a living human. as you break down their form, the sympathetic connection gets weaker until they're just a pile of bones again. or that's how i'd explain it anyway.
James Ross
Necromancy uses invisible threads of magic to simulate the muscle of real living creatures.
Objects passing through the false muscles at speed disrupt them, causing the skeleton to weaken, until it spontaneous disassembles.
Julian Russell
>He's got a point you know
Is the point that you've been making a lot of pointless threads lately?
Joshua Rodriguez
Skeletons are animated by a field of dark magic acting as flesh that can be disrupted or damaged in normal ways.
Alexander Barnes
replace the broadheads with miniature metal fists
Jayden Perry
how convenient
Dominic Wright
Something something vessel for dark magic something something human shape something
Zachary Bell
>He's got a point
So he should do less damage to skeletons, then
Aaron Diaz
Ah, a fellow Dwarf Fortress player.
It's almost a shame that they need heads or graspers now. The monstrous tide of miscellaneous dismembered bodyparts sure was a thing.
Adam Cruz
What in the flying fuck did his necromancers get a hold of in order to have an entire volley of arrows pass right through the gaps of its ribcage?
Fuck that! There's only one recourse for necromancers powerful enough to raise GIANTS, calling in every paladin order to do battle.