BTC / BCH

Shill me on the eventual winner Veeky Forums

Bitcoin
>scaling via segwit2x and lightning network
>off chain transactions allow infinite tps
>payment hubs increase efficiency further by becoming middlemen

end result - centralization

large amounts of liquidity are needed to operate an efficient payment hub
who has large amount of liquidity? banks


Bitcoin Cash
>scaling via increased block sizes
>reduces fees / time waiting short term
>larger blocks needed as adoption increases

end result - centralization

everyday people can't afford to run an increasingly growing network
encouraging mining to become more centralized
Does any variant of Bitcoin have a future without serious centralization?
starting to feel like IOTA is the way to go

Other urls found in this thread:

dymaxion.burst.cryptoguru.org/The-Burst-Dymaxion-1.00.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=SJ_lVBLUjXk
medium.com/@ercwl/iota-is-centralized-6289246e7b4d
txhighway.com
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>lightning network
here's a redpill for ya

ARK

>>scaling via segwit2x and lightning network
lol yeah it totally has that hahaha
inb4 just x months away

dymaxion.burst.cryptoguru.org/The-Burst-Dymaxion-1.00.pdf

>Trash/Trash+

yeah I can't imagine LN implementation ending well

not saying it'll necessarily have it soon,
but SW / LN are the main ways of scaling BTC everyone talks about

as far as I know miners dont want to increase block sizes on BTC

>the main ways of scaling BTC shills, sockpuppets and brainwashed normies talk about
BTC wont solve the fee problem anytime soon and it will crash like the shitcoin it is
i sure hope you're not holding any bags when the exodus starts

BCH is the real Bitcoin

so are you pro BCH or another alt?
and why?

how can either BTC or BCH claim to be anything when they fail to be a distributed network