Stat him, Veeky Forums

Stat him, Veeky Forums.

Other urls found in this thread:

loc.gov/exhibits/archives/anti.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

-10 hp

Honestly muslims, /pol/acks becoming muslim-tier and even buddhists being shithead make mr unironically believe that something with religion itself is wrong.

It's a vestigial remnant from the time when pattern recognition meant the difference between survival and being eaten by a tiger.

Seeing patterns where they don't exist is less of a detriment to the survival of a species than not being able to see patterns when they actually do exist.

>unironically believe that something with religion itself is wrong.
That means you've finally woken up, user.

Race: Saudi Arabian

Feats:
Leadership

High Charisma

Decent Hide skill

Family man with traditional values like death to america.

Cunt/10

Villains who did nothing wrong /10

...

Remember when he was the good guy? Good times.

FPBP.

Yep, the worst people did in the name of atheism are being pretentious awkard teenagers.
Really nothing even in comparaison of terrorists or even /pol/acks, it says a lot about your moral character that you think it's even comparable.

The problem is evangelism.
Once upon a time, religious leaders were more concerned with helping the people around them than they were with power. Indeed, you can see this in some of the requirements religions impose on their followers (i.e., don't eat bacon, don't cut your beard with a rusty razor, only have sex with one person). These demands kept people from consuming too much fat, getting tetanus from shaving nicks, and spreading STDs.
Then evangelism happened. Surely, the priests said, if we are spreading the word of God then we can do no harm? And, of course, they declared themselves the only true believers, because true believers spread the word of their God all the time.
Evangelism gets the word out faster and gains you more followers (and donations) than traditional clergy could. And it does this by ignoring the good that an organized group of people with money can do. Jehova's Witnesses went out to the site of Harvey's devastation, not with food and water, but with iPads and gospel, and you can't eat gospel.
Then came extremism, which took evangelism to its logical conclusion: anyone who does not convert must be an enemy, and therefore if they do not convert they must be destroyed. Never mind the beliefs themselves; what matters is the total dominance of those beliefs. You see extremism, not only in religion, but in our modern politics, where anyone who isn't with you MUST be against you.

tl;dr: Greedy assholes ruined religion, just like everything else.

Wow, I'm an atheist and this shit is retarded.

Obsession: power and revenge.
Rage stimulus: infidels.
Fear stimulus: agents of foreign intelligence, especially American (violence)
Noble stimulus: serving Allah

Body: 60
Athletics 30, Fighting 30, Torture 15, Survival 15.
Speed: 50
Evasion 30, Driving 20, Firearms 30
Mind: 40
General education 10, Bombs 15, Paradigm: radical Muslim 20 (*), Attention 15, Politics 15.
Soul: 40
Lies 20, Charm 15, Brainwashing 20

Violence: 5/ 3X, Helplessness: 2/, Isolation: 1/ 1X, Self 0*, Unnatural 1X*

Health 0 / 60

Let me guess: religion has been evil from the start, and everyone should be atheists because smart people told you that atheism is good. And, of course, anybody who says otherwise has been brainwashed by Catholics.

Pretty sure some people wound up in the gulag.

Explain to me how the mere fact of not believing in God implies you must a commie.
Marxism implies atheism, not the other way around.

No more than being a theist implies being being either Christian or Muslim. No more than being part of a religion implies being actively engaged in killings.

*tips cross*

Irrelevant. Soviet gosateizm and communist anti-religious policies have done their fair share of damage. The worst people have done on the name of atheism is kill and imprison just like the religious do. Turns out that humans kill for whatever reason they can find.

*tips fedora*
You and I, we're more alike than you'd think.

Not him but:
People killed by religious fanatics were killed because they were wrong religion or atheists specifically. People killed by stalinists were killed because they were enemies of the regime, not because they were religious.

But if religious people are considered enemies of the state by default, doesn't that mean they are killing people for being religious?

Those people did target people just for being religious. State atheism was a thing. It wasn't even a side thing or because some church doctrine disagrees, it was an explicit goal. A failed goal but a goal nonetheless.

He's got the aquatic subtype.

Strength 6

TWERPS completely changed the way I look at stat me threads forever

Are you trying to imply that the USA supported terrorist organizations?

No. There were plenty of religious people in the USSR in Stalin's times, and nobody was killing them or imprisoning them for being religious. A person could've been imprisoned for taking his underaged child to church or for teaching the bible, or whatever other sacred book, but not for being religious, even openly so. Church was viewed as a tool of oppression in 20-40-s, a tool that was helping tzars' governments oppress the peasants.
Now, I'm not saying that the Soviets did not do the same thing but with ideological propaganda instead of religion. I'm not saying Stalin was right. I'm not saying state atheism wasn't a thing. I'm just saying it was not atheism for the sake of atheism, it was atheism for the sake of destroying the previous regimme that did make good use of religion, desu. Since 1950-s, religion is still frowned upon, but not actively oppressed.

That's the thing. Their methods failed. It doesn't subtract from their attempts and intent. There's stories of children being fed certain forbidden foods on various holy holidays to see who would reject and out themselves. Unless rationality can be blamed, their atheism was the reason.

> There's stories
There's stories of Jews eating Christian babies for dinner. So what?

These are actually grounded. The communists had many ways to reveal closet religious people.

>and nobody was killing them or imprisoning them for being religious
I'm sure the priests and bishops feel the same.

Their anti religious campaigns were an attempt to get rid of them and supplant their state atheism. It was exactly because they were religious.loc.gov/exhibits/archives/anti.html

Hey guys how about those traditional games I hear theyre great

Underrated post

Hijacking the thread back from /pol/.

Stat me Veeky Forums!

It's a common knowledge.

It's usually the first reply in every stat-me thread about a dead person.

If you want /pol/ threads on Veeky Forums to disappear, start talking about how much you want quest threads back on Veeky Forums. The mod isn't going to delete the thread for being /pol/bait, but he'll act quickly if people start complaining about the ban on quest threads.

You know the CIA gave him guns, right?

It took this far for you to realize something about religion smells fishy as fuck?
Come on, have some common sense goddamnit. There is literally nothing wrong about living under a set of principles that you agree with, but when a person just follows blindly everything some book says, because there is some invisible dude that says so, you can't just ignore that's retarded.
>inb4 fedoras, i.e. I win

That's one unfortunate thing. They did get some of their weapons somehow

Hey, at least Atheists haven't launched any Crusades or Jihads. At absolute worst, you get a cringy edgelord with atheism, as opposed to screaming fanatics blowing random people up in the name of their invisible sky-daddy.

So you claim...

That's because Stalin was a fucking sociopath, not because of atheism.

What is it with sociopaths and running countries into the dirt?

>buddhists being shithead
That's literally in responce to muslims being shitheads if you're referring to burma and that monk asian wrath.

A country is its people. If you kill your country's people you are killing your country.

Or because he practiced a form of atheism which sought to kill religion. Also, Stalin wasn't the only one. Marx-Leninism isn't Stalin exclusive.

They've launched numerous campaigns though. See China

Finally, a nazimod that's right for me!

>decent hide skill
I would think that was more of the ISI's ability.

They weren't terrorists back when they were terrorizing the socialists. They were freedom fighters. Then commies collapsed and the CIA quietly cut all ties to the region, leaving their former contacts with training, weapons, and no oversight.

If they kill commies? Sure.

Technically I don't think Bin laden Himself was part of the USA-Pakistani Intelligence-Mujaha-james-deen gunrunning. He financed his own arms purchases.

The Mujahadeen were armed by the Pakistanis with guns and stingers from the USA, then they fractured and the Taliban were born out of them.

THEN the Taliban cut a deal with Bin Laden's personal self-funded Al-Qaeda.

The whole "Your terrorists are our freedom fighters" thing?

yeah

You *COULD* argue that without the other Mujaheddin as a main threat, Osama's much smaller band of brigands would have been wiped out by the Soviets.

the muj was getting their asses kicked right until 1992 when funding finally ran out for the Najibullah government.

-10 HP
Chaotic Good

Don't you mean...

Sharia Lawful?

>Le the US buried him secretly
How retarded to you have to be to believe this?
I'm legitimatly asking.

>wanting his tomb to become a tourist site for jihadi yahoos.

Bury him in a septic tank and charge people to use the toilets connected to it.

Fix the deficit overnight and the debt in a week.

>people blow up the septic tank
>burgerland invades iraq yet again.

>...
>profit?

>profit
yeah, because hearing a bunch of retards with no knowledge of economics whine about debt is someone's idea of a profit.

...

What's written in this paper is true, from a certain point of view.

Level 1 Commoner