Previous Thread: A thread for discussing the Star Trek franchise and its various tabletop iterations.
Possible topics include Star Trek Adventures - the new rpg being produced by Modiphius - and WizKids’ Star Trek: Attack Wing miniatures game, as well as the previous rpgs produced by FASA, Last Unicorn Games and Decipher, the Starfleet Battles Universe, and Star Trek in general.
Finally, someone else makes the new thread. Thanks, user.
Jordan Long
Daily reminder Dukat did nothing wrong.
Chase Morris
No, he did one thing wrong: not killing all the Bajorans when he had the chance.
Lincoln Ramirez
Also getting drunk and letting Damar shoot Ziyal was a bad idea.
Jason Rodriguez
The more I think about it the more I like that the Orville has to use a space-minivan instead of transporters.
Fuck that's gotta be so much better for creating tension without bullshit excuses as to why people can't just be beamed back. let alone avoiding all the headaches of 'why don't the just use the transporter to do X'.
Elijah Thomas
The only reason TOS used transporters at all was a budget issue.
Michael Foster
While it does make for more creative writing in universe it doesn't really make sense. They have matter replicators for food. It's a very small step from there to teleporters
Brody Wright
To be fair, Dukat wasn't drunk at that point, he was crazy (well, crazier than usual anyway).
Carter Scott
Are they true replicators or just really fast fabricators? Because that'd matter when it comes to, well, raw matter. If they're just building from stock then they're not close to teleporters.
Ryan Diaz
No one knows but the more reasonable of us believe they stock tanks of various atomic matter. Especially since they need those for various scientific feats they pull off during the series, like particle dumps and such.
Noah Peterson
In one of the early episodes we saw a room full of replicators where people were making clothes and gifts for themselves and others. I suspect they're fabricators, given how much energy it takes to replicate a teddy bear out of nothing.
Jacob Adams
It takes it's mass in antimatter PLUS inefficiency losses, so yeah it's pretty fucking energy intensive.
Sebastian Robinson
Transporters aren't all that bad. Though a very nifty piece of technology, stopping them from working is as easy as closing a door or disrupting communications so you can't get a lock on their location.
Robert Cruz
They don't necessarily have to be made out of nothing. The could be using a stock material of matter and recombining the atoms into something else.
Brandon Russell
Fuck you.
Caleb Barnes
t. Bajoran
Cooper Martin
*Angry gull noises ensue.
Anthony Nguyen
This is really funnier then it should be.
Ryan Evans
Hatoful Cardassian
Caleb Gutierrez
...
Adam Cruz
Transporters not working through shields is a pretty satisfactory limitation most of the time. Though sometimes there are advanced/special transporters that can go through shields and no one ever thinks to just send a bomb with those.
Connor Hughes
I made this just for you /stg/.
Cooper Smith
To those who play Star Trek Adventures, does the Klingon Brak'lul ability apply to weapons/attacks with specifically the Non-Lethal Quality, or attacks that are just set to nonlethal damage like phasers on stun?
Dominic Sanchez
So, I came here looking for Star Trek Adventures materials, trying to see if the game is something I can get my friends to play... the link up top to the Playtest Materials leads to a "folder not found" message.
Am I out of luck?
Jordan Mitchell
My interpretation is that it's any attack that is set to non-lethal damage. Meaning that unless you declare your attack as lethal, the Klingon NPC in question gets the resistance.
Your best bet is grabbing the free quickstart package from DriveThruRPG
Benjamin Robinson
Drop your discord or email and I'll sort you out.
Wyatt King
Wow, 3 threads in a row, No one's life is harder than yours.
James Garcia
>lost
Cooper Ross
But there's all sorts of times that you'll want to put characters in a place and relieve them of ship-based options that don't involve shields and stuff. Then you have to start adding in complications that may or may not be consistent.
And then there's just the stuff like why are they not using transporters constantly for the myriad other things that happened with them.
Andrew Bennett
I've always explained it away as mass limitations; it's not that the ship can't beam up more, but the more and more you beam up the less and less likely you are to get a solid signal lock, so for really large loads they need shuttles or something.
Isaiah Murphy
Check the PDF thread.
Easton Nelson
>with that base being 5 days away works out somewhere like 1000 light-years for a rough estimate
Maybe. About 10 light years per hour is said to be the Orville's maximum speed; it probably doesn't cruise at that speed very often if it can avoid it, for the same reason that the Enterprise doesn't constantly cruise around at Warp 9.
Easton Sullivan
PHASED TACHYON PULSE CONVERSION-FUCKWAVE EMITTERS
Jeremiah Johnson
You're forgetting the fact that even in Star Trek the transporter technically kills you. Also that replicators don't flawlessly copy materials, just get it close enough.
Isaiah Sanders
I've said it before but one big thing I'd want to change up if I were to re-do Star Trek from the start for an alternative universe reboot or whatever, transporters would be a function of space-warping tech so they just make here and there much much closer, rather than disassemble/reassemble.
Because fuck all the implications of shit like transporter duplicates and regeneration and all that guff.
Jaxson Morris
>Because fuck all the implications
There are no implications. Star Trek has adamantly taken the stance that the way the transporter works it moves you from one place to the next. You're the same person, you don't die. Any perception you have of it being different is due to the fact that you're some schmuck watching TV using 21st century knowledge, and thus have no idea how 23rd+ century technology works.
A Roman would be just as terrified of an airplane, or a camera.
Lucas Lewis
One of the Barclay episodes shows that you're still cognizant during transport. So it seems to support the notion that you're still you and any transporter based consciousness fuckery is in the vast minority of cases.
Jaxon Miller
Except what he's talking about, like transporter duplicates and regeneration, has actually happened in hard canon. So yes, you can effectively use the transporter to clone someone, or save a pattern of their younger self and restore them to it with no loss of memory so nobody dies of old age. That has a shit-ton of implications for what's possible with transporter tech if you extrapolate from what's shown on screen.
Kevin Morales
But there is no reason they should have happened. How the transporter works implies nothing since it's all imaginary.
Owen Wright
That's what he's saying.
Kayden Diaz
And yet somehow with the right application of fairy dust it can create full duplicates of people. That good/evil split of Kirk. The alternative Riker. It can also merge people like with Tuvix. It can be used to completely regenerate a person like when Pulaski got old, fast. Somehow the stream it can be broken out of like with the super-soldier.
That's the implications I'm on about.
Juan White
Don't forget it also deactivates weapons, has a built in bacterial filter and get you can get stuck in the data stream for months (or 75 years) at a time and show up as creepy snake monsters to other people transporting.
Ethan Hall
One-in-a-billion chances which they aren't going to try to reproduce on anything living until tech makes it reliable in a century or so. Why it always happens to the Enterprise, that's the narrative. Also Romulans would understand a camera but be aghast that anyone trusts airplanes. When in doubt, it's unique, when asked why, it's quantum.
Nathaniel Price
>It can be used to completely regenerate a person like when Pulaski got old This is particularly troublesome, because there wasn't anything strange fucking with the transporter. They just decided to do it, after someone suggested it. And they talk about it like no one ever thought to use a transporter that way before. Then never mention it again, even though there's no apparent reason they couldn't do the same thing to treat any disease or injury.
Oliver Hall
They kinda did the same thing in reverse in Rascals. Even if you assume Pulaski was due to disease and the transporter biofilters filtered the disease and thus returned her to normal somehow, in Rascals they just reversed the process by using a previous copy of their transporter patterns, with no loss in memory. You could do the same thing repeatedly to keep someone from growing old indefinitely.
David Wright
Here's the secret to Trek: if the episode isn't good enough to really stick with people, it's not _really_ canon.
Blake Smith
That episode does also blatantly contradict DS9's claim that genetic enhancement is strictly banned in the Federation.
Justin Kelly
Pulaski was a Q. None of that shit actually worked.
Austin Barnes
I haven't seen the TNG ep you're talking about, but are you sure it's enhancement and not correcting genetic disease? Pretty sure that's allowed.
Charles Peterson
They made super-people.
Telepathic, Telekinetic, Terribly dressed super people.
Luke Miller
There's banning regular people from doing it, and there's limited scale government projects where we take a minute to remind ourselves why we banned it.
>even in Star Trek the transporter technically kills you How is Philosophy 090 user? But seriously, souls (or soul-analogs) are a thing in Trek, and they're transported too, apparently separately from the more physical parts.
Connor Ramirez
Which Riker was the real one then?
Evan Garcia
Neither of them.
Dylan Miller
The second they started experiencing the world differently they became two different people.
Zachary Lewis
>You're forgetting the fact that even in Star Trek the transporter technically kills you.
Ayden Robinson
>Implying people aren't dying every time they fall asleep user pls
Angel Perez
So a couple of threads ago there was an argument over what happened to the military vessels of the Founding members of the Federation seeing as how we mostly see Starfleet vessels int he show. Now I know this is Beta canon but at the end of the Romulan War duology, it's given an explanation. T'Pau struggled the whole war with whether or not to join the fight and break with pacifist teachings of Surak. She eventually does at the every end but worries that this will cause long term damage to Vulcan culture in the end. To hammer home her commitment to peace she has the Vulcan Defense Force broken down and turned into materials for Earth Outposts along the Romulan Neutral Zone.
Juan Reyes
What about the Andorians?
Aiden James
It's not stated in the book. So I should have said a partial explanation
Josiah Rodriguez
His pic states exactly that, silly.
Brayden Foster
My assumption was that those ships were just gradually phased out. When the Federation was new, Starfleet would have been a hodgepodge of the founding member's fleets. Then the next generation of new ships would be a fusion of tech from all four.
Benjamin Baker
So in STA, each species has two talents they can pick from. What might those be for a Caitian? I already figured out their attributes should be +1 to Control, Daring, and Fitness.
Jack Jackson
This is also my thinking.
Reasoning being that the federation founder's own military fleets just became increasingly obsolete in the face of the advances they made as a whole. Whilst we know for certain that people like Vulcans got their own ships as well as serving in Star Fleet in general (actual canon from TOS and DS9 not beta-canon like the 'blue fleet' of the Andorians), we also know those were Star Fleet designs.
So by TOS at least it's fairly safe to assume that whilst there may have been a bunch of Vulcan, Andorian or Tellarite specific designs still hanging about (they'll have still all had their ship-building industries, the Andorian one at least is specifically confirmed in canon via bridge plaques iirc), almost anything important will be a Star Fleet vessel.
Easton Lewis
>You could do the same thing repeatedly to keep someone from growing old indefinitely. I have read horrible fan fiction where people did just that.
Owen Anderson
Just started the next book in the Enterprise Series Rise of the Federation. It has some words to say about the happenings of the various fleets. "Although the various space agencies of the UFP's five founding members still existed and oversaw their own ships and specialties within the combined fleet they jointly administered, they'd agreed they should adopt a common uniform with elements reflecting all it's member races." So again Beta Canon and nothing definitive but interesting nonetheless. It then goes on to describe the new uniform if anyone is interested.
Chase Fisher
>UFP's five founding members What's the 5th? Humans, Vulcans, Andorians, Tellerites, and. . . ?
Easton Morales
At the end of the last book the 5 included the Draylaxians
Kevin Carter
There are a few sources that claim the Alpha Centaurians were the fifth founding member. No alpha canon though, alpha is only the four I believe.
Nolan Watson
Alpha Centauri were definitely a founding member but the line says "5 founding races" and the Alphas were human after all.
Parker Green
Nevermind I looked again it doesn't say that in the book at all
Grayson Clark
>Draylaxians The only canon info about this species is that their women have three boobs.
Isaac Kelly
Saurian. Gene said it was Saurian.
Gavin Gomez
That's pretty much the only thing mentioned about them in the Beta canon books too.
Henry Green
This
Samuel Smith
Huh, was that in an interview or something? Memory Alpha isn't willing to say for sure that they're a Federation member, and Memory Beta says they joined in the 23rd century.
Henry Thomas
>that panel
Old computers used to be aesthetic as fuck
Jeremiah Cruz
That has about as much to do with old computers as Brainiac.
Wyatt Gutierrez
Would there be any interest in playing (or watching) an STA game on Friday evenings aboard a Prometheus class? I'm looking to replace a failing D&D game with a completely different system that has players actually invested in roleplaying together instead of playing "how much dice can I roll?"
Levi Nelson
>boot up netflix >star trek discovery
what the fuck! theres a new series? is it good?
Noah Ross
Yes, depends on how well you can divorce the series from your Trekspectations.
Jeremiah Morris
No.
Adam Barnes
I'd be kind of interested in playing. Is this on Roll20 or something? I've got about 1400 hours of Roll20 under my belt with various game systems. It's all been text chat thought.
Joshua Fisher
Yeah it'd be on roll20 and discord voice.
Aiden Campbell
That's weird. I can't find it either and it used to be on memory alpha.
Michael Campbell
So 2pm?
Logan Garcia
2pm what? I'm EST I'm not too crazy about the voice chat aspect of it. I've been playing with a group of friends on roll20 since 2012. We've done 3e, 3.5e 5e D&D. Pahtfinder, Call of Cuthulu, Mutants and Masterminds, StarWars RPG, Feng Shui 2.0 Currently playing an All Flesh Must Be Eaten campaign with them every Wednesday.
Aaron Reed
>It then goes on to describe the new uniform if anyone is interested. I am.
Julian White
Watch Orville instead
Ian Richardson
Someone has apparently thrown together a mockup using the description in the book. It's pretty dead on.
Levi Robinson
Whoops
Colton Ward
"Mayweather's black under-shirt sported a Vulcan-style Mandarin collar; over it was a V-necked tunic worn above a separate pair of black trousers and boots. Archer's own command-division tunic was an avocado green not unlike the command color of the Andorian Guard, while Mayweather's operation-division tunic was reddish-brown per Tellarite military convention. The lieutenant's rank insignia- a single gold stripe, as opposed to five alternating wide and narrow stripes for Archer- adorned each of his cuffs and shoulder straps. The shoulders were set off by a shallow chevron of gold fringed navy-blue piping extending from shoulder joints to mid-sternum, reflecting Vulcan designs from the twenty-first century. Below the piping, next to the vertical zipper of the left-hand tunic pocket, was the gold arrowhead insignia of the United Earth Space Probe Agency, the government department that administered Earth's Starfleet. To balance it, the mission patch , a circular blue field of stars behind a horizontal gold chevron, rather than a specific ship's design. "
Robert Martin
>watch this discovery >several movies worth of conflic in 2 episodes
What the FUCK am I watching
Nathaniel Phillips
A pilot? Something that's not like other things (and so is bad I guess)?
Parker Bell
>episode 3 >it turned into Aliens
I don't even know what to say
Parker Ortiz
What I mean is, it might be a legitimate concern in the Orville. I can see conservatives wanting human transportation banned, and I can see that resolution passing with only minor grumbling from the scientific community.
Angel Rivera
I'd expect nothing else from the fandom that birthed Mary Sue.
Jeremiah Nelson
Don't forget that it's also responsible for slash, or at the very least, popularizing it.