Are they really that bad?
Are they really that bad?
Julian Nguyen
Oliver Garcia
Bad at what? Tabletop-wise? they're equal to chaos warriors so they're fine.
fluff-wise? depends if you like the fluff overall for sigmar.
Julian Nelson
Can you be more specific?
Cooper Johnson
If anything convinces me that Sigmar is one of the lost primarchs, it's this.
James Wood
"good" aligned chaos warrior types isn't really something I'd have a problem with (I mean, grail knights did it and I love them), but their miniature line is kind of terrible
Matthew Moore
I like them. Their aesthetic is pretty cool, with the stardrakes and all that. Their fluff is also an interesting take on the fantasy super soldier.
I just wish they werent pushed and shoved in every fucking box gw releases. But 40k is getting the same treatment with space marines and primaris marines. so I shouldnt be surprised honestly
Dominic Cox
I think the more fluff they get, the more they grow on me. Still not perfect, but given some time I think they could be compelling.
Aesthetically, I think it was a bit of a shock to the system to go from both WHFB and 40k human being almost entirely baroque and gothic to experimenting with Art Deco. Once I made that connection the art of azyrheim and the stormcast became more tolerable.
Ethan Campbell
Ah yes, a synagogue of sigmar
Kayden Evans
>For the emperor/for sigmar
>Thunder hammers
>"Stormbolt pistols" (hand crossbows)/bolters
>Deep strike
>All look the same
>Pauldrons
>Chapters/Chambers
>in every fucking box
>Not space marines
Jace Gutierrez
>Hey mom, I called stormcast and GW Jews again, am I original yet?