Creep tries to "sneak" his fetish into the game

Wow, somebody has some some issues.

He's not the one trying to use roleplaying games as a vehicle for masturbation. Or, more accurately, to pretend to want to use fetishes in games while just looking for an opportunity to discuss them anonymously.

Veeky Forums is a sad place, because while it benefits from anonymous posting in a lot of ways, it also suffers by having to harbor people like you. C'est la vie.

[badwrongfun intensifies]

He ain't hurting anyboy, user. You two are way too concerned about what other tables full of consenting adults like to do.

So, basically, you have no understanding of how ERP works? Possibly sexuality as a whole? Good to know.

Just fyi, masturbating during an ERP is a major faux pas. During the session you should focus on the session, keeping up a good pace of replies and not breaking the flow of the session. If you want to jerk off you do so to the logs later.

*anybody

I like how much thought you put into being retarded.

>Just fyi, masturbating during an ERP is a major faux pas

Oh wow, I didn't realize ERPers were so cultured and disciplined.

Or such terrible and retarded liars.

Well, I don't claim that everybody who participates in an ERP doesn't do so. But in an actual group who are interested in erotic storytelling, making other people wait so you can jack off will get you kicked.

Why do you find it so hard to believe that people would sincerely enjoy mixing erotic elements into an otherwise ordinary RPG? Erotic literature that mixes sex scenes and erotic elements with an actual plot has been a thing for basically forever, this is just an interactive version.

(You)

ERPing is a social faux pas built on social faux pas. Masturbation is at the core of its identity, and trying to say ERPers don't masturbate during games out of a sense of decency is really vastly overestimating how much decency is inside any of these people.

From how you're talking, you have no practical experience of any sort. I've played and run these games for years. People don't jerk off during sessions.

>Why do you find it so hard to believe that people would sincerely enjoy mixing erotic elements into an otherwise ordinary RPG?

Why are you so proud of people waiting till after the game to masturbate to it? I can't even start to wrap my head around how brainfucked you are, because you are stupid enough to think that erotic literature doesn't have to make sacrifices of plot and character in order to enable the erotic elements to take place at the frequency they do.

There's a sharp divide between literature with some sex and erotic "literature", and you being unable to appreciate that is why you keep trying to hamfist your fetishes into games and thinking you are being brilliant and insightful rather than pathetic and mindless.

So you legitimately believe it's possible for something to be a compelling story while also being erotic?

Why?

>erotic literature

I like how you unabashedly use an oxymoron like that.

Give it up, lewd user, the bluenose is just trolling you at this point. Nobody could be this dense unless it was on purpose.

I'm saying you're an idiot who doesn't recognize what sacrifices must be made to plot and character in order to reach the level where a game is called erotic.

Hell, look at your shitty fetish threads. The deep thought processes and motivations behind the decisions they're making on what to include in their imaginary games?

"I like to masturbate to this."

But of course, that's not something that leads to contrived, hollow, and masturbatory games, because you think tacking on some pretentious bullshit elevates your farces, alongside your "no jerking it while we're playing" honor-amongst-thieves lies.

You're trying to pretend ERPs are not the lowest of a not particularly tall medium to begin with, and that sinking lower is something to be embraced and applauded rather than ridiculed.

Nice try.

So yes, you really do believe it's impossible to combine erotic elements with legitimate storytelling.

Man, you must be really repressed. I feel sorry for you.

Read the post again, dickbrain.

Erotic elements are like fireworks. Hell, orchestras have figured out how to include them in symphonies. But, there's very little art in a group of people firing bottle rockets at each other.

We're not talking about High Shakespeare here. We're talking about your shitty ERP games, games you apparently are so proud of, when they are the "literary" equivalent of porno scripts.

You don't even understand how sad and pathetic your games are, because you've been running them for years. You're so far gone, the only bit of sense or shame you have left is to at least discuss and pride yourself anonymously.

You even admitted people go back to masturbate to the game logs. I don't think you understand how sad and pathetic that is, considering that you believe that's something to be proud of while masturbating during a game is that line you amusingly decided is the one that shouldn't be crossed.

You're the guy who's house is on fire asking people to not smoke inside.

What do I have to be ashamed of? I helped create an experience that a group of my friends enjoyed and found sexually pleasurable. I'm proud of my part in it, glad I participated it, and continue to do so because it's something I enjoy.

What about that is shameful?

You use games as a vehicle for masturbation and put airs on it.

You have an inkling that it's shameful, hence your silly "please wait until we're done" masturbation rule, but you're dumb enough to try to pretend that you're not a cringe-factory enabling a groups of similarly sad people to masturbate while using the game as a pretext.

You being proud of supplying your friends with masturbation fuel is kind of sad. Just jerk them off if you want to "help create an experience that a group of my friends enjoyed and found sexually pleasurable." At least then you wouldn't be a pretentious tart.

You have sinned, user, and you must repent! The first sign of sin is that you all enjoyed it! That you feel you should insist that you're not hurting anyone is only further proof that you are hurting God and your immortal soul! Repent!

No? There's nothing in that rule about shame. It's a simple matter of practicality. If you're jerking off and making people wait for your post, you're just being a dick.

Do you just consider sex and sexual pleasure innately shameful? That's kinda sad.

>what you dont make fap material for all your no homo bros?
>you must think sex is evil! Puritan!

Yeah, because it's either jerk my friends off during a game or I hate sex and find it abhorrent. Lol, are you fucking serious?

No? Jerking off during the game isn't something we do. Please try to keep up.

Sex is a wonderful thing.

Nerds trying to arouse each other during a game is innately shameful, and gets worse when they pretentiously think they're "spontaneously crafting erotic literature" or however else you'd want to describe your imaginary circle-jerk.

>If you're jerking off and making people wait for your post, you're just being a dick.

Or just being an ERPer.

>we wait until afterwards to masturbate!

How noble of you.

So only specific kinds of sexual pleasure are permitted? By who? What standards do you apply?

Why does a group of friends making one another happy and enjoying themselves upset you so much?

Thank you! We try to keep our degenerate ways to a sufficiently high standard. See my above comments about not liking one off sex scenes in general. Narrative context is necessary to make something really hot. Without an actual emotional connection between characters, it's a lot less appealing.

>Why does a group of friends making one another happy and enjoying themselves upset you so much?

Only when you put on airs, thinking what you're doing is more akin to how other people roleplay rather than just a pretentious form of circlejerking.

Nobody told you to stop, only that you're pathetic and a joke of a human who needs to console themselves with similarly pathetic people. That, and you are more cringe than the human body is supposed to contain, so it leaks out into all of your activities, including RPs and even every single one of your posts.

I actually have done ERP and I see the other guy's point.

What you are describing is not a story with some erotic elements or sex in it. You specifically call it an ERP. Which means that the eroticism is the focal point, rather than just one of many different elements in the game. And if you are going to do an ERP, that's fine. Unlike the other dude I have no issue with that, but to sit there and act like your ERP is so high brow and that anyone who finds it stupid just hates sex is retarded. There is a vast difference between finding your attempts to make an ERP seem mature absolutely ridiculous and someone who hates sex. Them not getting together with a bunch of other people to get one another off is not a sign that they hate sex.

A game that has mature themes as well as sex? That's fine and can be done well. What you want is specifically an ERP, which means the story is gonna be all about the sex. Ya aren't crafting a story in which eroticism plays a role, but you're all just sitting there and pretending that you are so classy for not simply getting to the point of why you are all there: to get off. Hence why people shit all over ERP, and not games that just so happen to involve mature themes.

>We try to keep our degenerate ways to a sufficiently high standard.

That makes you more pathetic, not less.

Nope. Our RP is just as valid as yours. We tell interesting stories, have well fleshed out characters, enjoy exciting adventures, and happen to indulge in the occasional sex scene or bit of ero-comedy because it's fun.

I'm exaggerating a bit because the other guy seems like an asshole. Our ERP games really are stories with erotic elements. I list them as ERP simply because the presence of those elements or not is generally a dealbreaker for some players, so I think it's important to make that element clear from the get go to ensure everyone involved knows what they're getting into. I still treat it as a legitimate campaign, with plots, NPC's, combat encounters and so on. Just, y'know, also sex and erotically charged situations.

>ell fleshed out characters, enjoy exciting adventures

>my standards have sunk so low I actually think the shitty games I run are good

You poor, poor fool. I'd feel sorry for you if you weren't so pathetic you've reached the point beyond pity.

And willfully too, you sad sack of lowered standards just so you can jerk your group off.

>I'm exaggerating a bit because the other guy seems like an asshole.

Sounds like you're backpedaling a bit now, even though you're still pretty far in the "The masturbatory aid I provide for players is something to be proud of" territory.

It also sounds like you've no idea how to do erotic elements tastefully if you do it to the level where it's a "deal breaker."

I don't even believe what you said. If you and your friends have to have a rule about no masturbating during a game, there is something wrong there. Either your friends have less self restraint than a fucking chimpanzee, or you aren't making these games actual stories, but porn plot tier excuses to get to sex scenes. Which is pretty fucking sad considering you are sitting here trying to defend it and defaming people who think it's dumb as being modern day puritans.

Because when I get together with friends and play a game that will have sex, I don't have to sit down and make rules to not just drop their pants and masturbate during the game. Nor is sex so ever prevalent that there would be a need for such a rule. Your games do sound like your bog standard ERP that uses flimsy plots to build up characters and then fuck. They don't sound like games being played by adults that involve sex or other mature themes. If they were you wouldn't have had to defend some pretty pathetic behavior on the part of people who play in your games.

Even I, as someone who likes ERP from time to time, can see the absolute dumpster fire your games must be, and the fact that you so staunchly defend that kind of behavior or try to paint it as mature and calling everyone else who calls you out a repressed person who hates sex really does make you pretty fucking pathetic.

I'm a bit confused what you mean at this point.

The games I run would be good games, even without the sex. But my group include it because it's an element we enjoy. However, onscreen sex, sexy situations and so on are things some people don't want to participate in, and that's fine. If I'm running a game with them I'll make that clear.

That my players might find the logs of sex scenes is one aspect of the game. It's an aspect I emphasised, mostly to fuck with that guy, but as I reiterated multiple times, I think narrative context and emotional weight is necessary to make that kind of sex scene fun.

As for the last bit I'm not even sure what you mean by it.

>High Shakespeare
Ahahahaha, oh god you really are an idiot aren't you.

That it's a rule doesn't mean it's something I've ever had to enforce. I mentioned it once to a new player, and they accepted it as a logical notion to keep sessions flowing smoothly, and left it at that. I mostly mentioned it just to correct the ignorance of the poster in The rest of it is just you making assumptions and being wrong, so... Okay?

This is the quality content we removed quests to make room for

Anti-lewd sentiments screeching about """degeneracy""" are far older than anti-quest ones and, unlike anti-quest protests, Veeky Forums's actually worse off for them

>Nope. Our RP is just as valid as yours.

My last RP session had a sex scene. These scenes are somewhat rare, but they do happen, because the characters are mostly young men and have no inhibitions towards casual sex.

But, it faded to black, because there's very little of importance to describe from that point on as far as the story is concerned. It would have just been a largely pointless distraction, since the players are actually invested in the plot and characters and want to see those progress, rather than wasting time on providing masturbation fuel.

Valid? Invalid? Meaningless terms. All I know is that my group cares far more about the circumstances that proceed and follow the act far more than the act itself, and it sounds like your group isn't as invested.

>would be good games,

Pfft.

>I think narrative context and emotional weight is necessary to make that kind of sex scene fun.

Oh wait, you might honestly believe your own bullshit.
I'd much rather believe you're still just fucking with us, and aren't actually this pathetic.

At least two people (myself and the one who called you a dickbrain) in this thread have said that erotic elements in games are not bad. What we have said is that the way you clearly do it is bad, which is only made a big deal out of because you sat there trying to defend it as mature and full of class when everything so far seems to indicate that your games are little more than porn plot tier in terms of story where everyone sits around with their dick out waiting for the sex scene to show up. And that is a very different scenario than "adult game that will include sex but also have a lot more substance to it than a few dudes sitting around and masturbating not only their dicks, but their egos as well when they righteously defend their ERP not as some flimsy porn plot, but part of some well crafted story that touches on all aspects of the human condition.

Nope. We still progress plots, we still value the story, but we also value downtime, slice of life moments, and scenes of emotional intimacy, which is something sex can convey exceptionally well. If my players weren't emotionally invested, they'd be really shitty sex scenes with no depth or complexity.

I'm not saying anyone else's way is wrong or that every game should be like mine. I'm just calling out badwrongfun assholes and pointless elitism where I see it.

>Nope.

Pfft.

You've still not explained why it's pathetic, or made any arguments to support it. You just keep asserting it as if that makes it true.

That wasn't actually me. Also, see above. You're making assumptions and you're wrong, but there's not much I can do to convince you otherwise, so I'll just see how annoyed you seem to get in the meantime.

I'm not annoyed at all. I'm just honestly baffled. Because I've played smut games and games where sex is only one part of the story or not touched on at all. I like game variety, and I have genuinely never seen a person defend an RP this hard and call anyone who calls you out on it a repressed person.

I've never seen people have to make rules telling people to not whip it out at the table either. I just don't understand. If you like smut games then fine, everyone has needs, but the way you can't even admit that your smut is smut and sit there pretending that it's a fucking work of art is just staggering. This is either some top tier bait or you really are fucking pathetic when you can't just admit when smut is smut.

So you're not actually properly reading the thread, then?

Go back and have another look. I'll wait. I'll give you one clue, I've already stated that one element of your post is factually false in the last few replies.

>We still progress plots, we still value the story, but we also value downtime, slice of life moments, and scenes of emotional intimacy,

I guess not having enough money for pizza is a plot, and finding some other way to pay for it does progress it.

Also, yes, we all know you're still just fucking with us. To compare your games with your tacked on plots, your bolted on "slice of life" moments, and your hollow characters to that of a game where people actually care about more than getting their imaginary proxy dicks wet is laughable.

You basically admitted that the only reason you bother with all that other stuff is because you posit that you couldn't get them off if you didn't include those things. Masturbation is your alpha and omega, the fulcrum and center of your plot and purpose of your games, and still you think people shouldn't act elitist towards you.

Wow, you really are reading way more into my posts than is actually there. Is reading comprehension just not your strong suit?

I honestly think he just made up the no masturbation during games rule. It's impossible to enforce during online games, and if it is a rule, I'd bet it's just something they say so they don't have to imagine each other masturbating while they play.

It's because reading comprehension is my strong suit that I can read into your posts.

You're really bad at defending this whole "Nerds using games to jerk each other off" thing, and you've already had to backpedal and admit you were exaggerating and lying several times so far.

My advice? Give up. Just go back to fetish shitposting instead of trying to argue the indefensible.

I did read the thread. I just don't buy your ad hoc excuses because I'd have to be retarded to think that a group of mature players needs such rules in place. Or, if such rules are in place, that they would act so elitist when their game is clearly all about smut and you have said repeatedly that it is to make your friends feel good. So, clearly there is a heavy emphasis on sex. Fair enough, but then the game really is porn plot level and not deep at all like you're making it out to be. You are trying to play both sides of the fence here and it is revealing how full of shit you are.

Like the other dude just said, it may as well be the pizza delivery man stereotype. Just because you make it sound flashier and use more prose doesn't make it any less of a veiled way to further the plot towards a sex scene. At least man up and be fucking honest to us and yourself here. Whether it is a pizza delivery boy or finding the princess's stolen ring because she desperately needs to have it for the ball, it doesn't change the fact that your plots and stories are just excuses and build up for a smut scene.

Funny thing, go back through the thread and look for the first use of the word 'rule'. It wasn't from me. I used his terminology for convenience sake, but as I said above, it's not something I've ever had to enforce and I've only ever mentioned it once. Not jacking off during a scene is just basic courtesy to the other players so they aren't waiting ages for you to post.

Eh, I think I'll keep posting sincerely about the game I enjoy with my friends and be faintly amused at how many people wildly misinterpret it.

>Not jacking off during a scene is just basic courtesy to the other players

Alright, you might have a shred of sanity left in y-

>so they aren't waiting ages for you to post.

Man, what the fuck is wrong with you. Do you know what should have followed "Not jacking off during a scene is just basic courtesy to the other players"? A period.

Why? Because masturbation doesn't really meaningfully impact the speed of a reply, and reply speed doesn't really matter to people not participating in a scene. Your attempt to justify the reason behind it being a "faux pas" doesn't really make a whole lot of sense if you don't have a basic understanding that it's a "basic courtesy" not to masturbate during a game. Period.

>I'll keep posting sincerely

How about you start instead?

I'm not sure what you're talking about at this point.

If someone was capable of masturbating during a scene without it slowing their ability to reply or interfering with the other players in any way, why should I care?

I should note, for context, that with ERP games I exclusively run them online. I've mentioned logs and posts before, but it's worth being explicit.

I'll do that right after you acknowledge your whole 'rule' argument was based on a false premise.

My word, you really are, genuinely, a dickbrained idiot.

The "we don't masturbate during games" was originally an attempted defense against the accurate statement that you use games as a vehicle for masturbation. Saying "we only masturbate to the games after the session" or "I use my games to sexually pleasure my players, and if they can hide their masturbation I'm fine with it" all just adds up to the same basic conclusion.

Now, you having a cock lodged in your brain might make you stupid enough to think your Pizza Payment Plots are deep and grand, but that's because you are unaware of what you are sacrificing in order to make your contrived plots function.

You can go ahead and say I have a stick up my ass or call me a puritan for actually thinking about the plot and characters as more than an afterthought, but fuck, man. I've never seen someone so poorly try to defend the indefensible before.

You could have at least gone the "I bet you have plots that just revolve around combat" or "At the end of the day, these are just silly games" angles, but no, you doubled down on "My erotically-charged sexventure is due for the Nobel Literature Prize," and that's why it's clear you are too far gone for anything resembling a discussion. All you've got is a showcase of what happens when people who ERP too much online try to talk to normal people.

I don't think you're a puritan at this point. Just an idiot.

It's really impressive, how much I never said you've become convinced is true. I'm fully aware nothing I say at this point can change your mind, you're so invested in your assumptions nothing I could say could change them, so I'm only really replying to see if you say anything else amusingly stupid.

It's called a division of perception. You may honestly not be able to see how shit your games are and are content or even proud of them. Or, you might just be adding more lies because you're not shy about doing that, and think everyone owes you some exaggerated courtesy of taking your statements as objective truths.

Either way, we're still only left with you saying "My plots are not contrived, even though they're contrived around sexually pleasuring my players."

Sad and pathetic, but even more pathetic than that contradiction is your continued efforts in its defense,

All I'm really saying is 'read the thread', because most of what you've said only really exists inside your own head.

But, again, nothing I say is going to convince you. I just have to satisfy myself with being amused by your delusions.

I just wish your delusions were amusing. This one in particular is a harsh reminder that I'm dealing with someone who's spent years ERPing online. You falling into your own world to protect your ego is genuinely sad.

Meanwhile, you continue to be fucking hilarious. I'm honestly fascinated by the person you think I am. The more you say, the more I learn about this imagined person and, I think, your own insecurities. It's really interesting.

ITT: A whole lot of anger and rage signifying nothing.

Since this is just a bunch of anons using a thread as soapbox to vent, have an elf. Now the thread has value. A small sliver.

Thank you, quads-elf chan.

90% of nerds are pathetic sacks of shit with deep psychological issues who can't get laid.

>Masturbating during an ERP is a major faux pas
you must use some real shitty places to meet people, the mutual masturbation is sometimes one of the best parts of it
go read fapfics if you want to jerk it to pre-written logs.

Truly Quads elf-Chan is the hero Veeky Forums needs

I love how the easiest way to debunk any notion that ERPers aren't sad people is to just look at some ERPers.

I love how this user does not just ignores whole this thing and still goes (I am not even related to the argument, I come here for lols), so at this point he is he loser because he has to have his word last.

This meta complaint thread sure is helping the quality of the board.

Whenever I make actually threads about topics to talk about they die with less than 4 replies. Yet the million "That Guy/DM" Or "Dumb players/GM" thread will hit bump limit. Same for shitty bait threads whether they be edition wars or controversial political topics. Shitty circlejerk generals aren't fun to be in. Nothing but a bunch of low effort threads up anyway. Some shithead's fetish thread is barely lowering the quality of the board. At least they are trying to be creative.

Their efforts to be "creative" are actually worse than doing nothing at all. Bad ideas reinforced by worse ideas only lead to the cesspits that those threads end up being.

It's the same level of discussion and reinforcement of "bad ideas" as any other creative thread. These ones just happen to be about a topic you don't like. Just filter them and move on if they make you so mad.

>It's the same level of discussion and reinforcement of "bad ideas" as any other creative thread.

You're delusional if you believe this.

But, I think you understand how those threads produce nothing but ideas that nucleate around flawed initial premises that crystallize into towering piles of shit, but you're just unwilling to admit to it.

>Whenever I make actually threads about topics to talk about they die with less than 4 replies.

They might get more replies if there weren't people spamming the same retarded threads ad nauseum on a worksafe board. They are misplaced /b/ threads, and the last thing any board should want is /b/ traffic flowing into it.

Then I'm delusional. I find both types of threads (fetish and non-fetish) to be full of ideas that I can adapt to use for my games.

It's simply easier to talk about things you don't like and those threads usually produce "entertaining" content because people love reading about stupid people for some reason Not much you can do about it.

ERP is fun!!!

If you idiots would just jack off/schlick before posting fetish;wat do threads would be so much less of a problem.

Jesus, the thread's REALLY irredeemable now.

You're new here, aren't you?

It's a combination of multiple factors, including
>moderation
>not having vaginas at the table
>not having manginas at the table
It's just an evening with the lads. Can you imagine it? The adventurers go meet up with the barbarian queen, who ends up flexing her guns to the wise, greyhaired cleric? Then the player looks the DM in the eyes and says
>You're just doing this because you like muscular chicks, right?
>Yoooo!
>YOOOOO!
>YOOOOOOOOOO!
>[YOOOOO! intensifies]

tl;dr: "Fun"

dont get it

I agree with ERP user on most of his points but disagree on one. The people he was replying to are just arguing badwrongfun. As long as it isn't about 'sneaking' your magical realm into the game to trick your players in participating in a fetish of yours, then what's the big deal? All this rigamarole about whether ERP user's plots are good or bad is irrelevant, it's not your group and if they're all consenting adults - then why does it activate your almonds so hard if they're having a good time?

But what I don't agree with ERP user with that Veeky Forums should have some kind of ERP general or dedicated thread. ERP doesn't belong on Veeky Forums as it really isn't traditional games. I would also argue that it doesn't fit well with the spirit of the board - I know Veeky Forums can into lewd sometimes, but I strongly feel that any dedicated general or thread about ERPing would just turn into a hookup thread or blatant fetish posting without the slightest inkling of traditional games to be found.

There are probably a million other places to talk about ERP without having to conform to Veeky Forums's rules so that it can be more suited for proper discussions - go do them there instead of here.

But he said exactly the same thing you did in

>any dedicated general or thread about ERPing would just turn into a hookup thread or blatant fetish posting without the slightest inkling of traditional games to be found.

That sort of did happen with the ERPG three years back. Though it should be said that the idea that it did not have the "slightest inkling" of traditional games was ironically betrayed by the post immediately before the one where the thread got banned. Pic related.

I see, my bad.

The only thing I disagree with is declaring they're the only worthwhile type. That's ridiculous.

Clarification- I meant that full RPG ERP's are the only worthwhile type, to me. Context free hookups are boring as sin without any emotional weight or narrative backing to give them meaning. Pure personal preference there though, not going to shame anyone for liking what they like.

>The people he was replying to are just arguing badwrongfun

>acting like badwrongfun doesn't exist
>acting that people who decide to talk about their games should be immune from being judged

If you sit in your basement and never talk about how pathetic you are, of course you should be free from being ostracized for your choices. But, the second you open your mouth on a public forum, expect people to judge you, and if you happen to be a particularly sad and pathetic piece of shit, expect to be judged hard.

But that's all that's happening. No one's stopping him from playing, no one's kicking in his teeth, all they're doing is sharing the important piece of knowledge that the games he plays are trash, and it's actually insulting for him to consider his pretentious circlejerks to fall within the same family as other roleplaying games. If he can't handle that knowledge, he probably should just keep his head under a rock and never try to bring light on his cringe-inducing parodies of a hobby.

Actually I'll just call you elitist cunts and laugh as you try to justify yourselves and argue why your opinion is superior, while I keep having fun with my friends in a way that is entirely as valid as anything would choose to do with yours.

Me ERPing a sex scene with a few friends of mine is exactly as valid, worthwhile and meaningful as your gaming group getting together to play your favourite system.

It sounds more like you're trying to convince yourself more than anyone else.

Oh, I gave up on convincing anyone ages ago. You'd know that if you read the thread. I was honestly expecting it to die overnight, but it kept getting bumped and there were a few more sincere posts where I wanted to reply to or clarify things for. That and laughing at stupid people are the only reason I'm still here.

>Actually I'll just call you elitist cunts and laugh

I'm sorry the poor anons hurt you.