New idea for a MtG format. 1) only auras, lands, and equipment allowed. 2) each player starts with a 1/1 construct artifact creature token in play. 3) during each players upkeep, if there is an aura an opponent controls on a creature you control with converted mana cost less than the number of auras and equipment attached to it, destroy that aura.
What do you think?
Gavin Nelson
turn one: I Dead Weight your 1/1 construct artifact
Gabriel Baker
So it should just be a hexproof construct and lose the 3rd rule i guess.
Aaron Reyes
Well shit this is gonna take some elbow grease now innit
Angel Green
Too easy to break. There are plenty of auras, equipment, and even lands that can kill a 1/1 with little effort. Each player should get more than 1 construct if you want this to work.
Adrian Ward
Or keep 3rd rule and make it a 1/4 ?
Mason Sullivan
Or 3 constructs?
Mason Thomas
IDEA it starts out as 1/20 with indestructible. The artifact is now a representation of you since when it dies you're boned anyway.
Isaiah Powell
So is there life in this format, or do you just win by killing their construct? Because if the former, life doesn't matter if your construct dies. There needs to be some way to get more constructs or it'll be as easy as whoever gets the better equipment/aura first wins. God forbid you get deathtouch on it. You pretty much either let them keep attacking you or suicide your guy into there's to trade, killing both and ending it in a draw. Or simply giving it double strike would almost certainly end it.
Kayden Morgan
>there's Theirs.
Hudson Watson
rough ideas >You can discard an aura/equipment card to create a construct token >You get a free construct at the start of your turn if you have none >If a construct would die or otherwise be removed you can remove an aura/equipment card to have it survive but your opponent chooses which one, like destroying pieces off your opponent's construct >auras/equipment attached to a >destroyed/removed construct are returned to your hand, this creates a choice between sacrificing your best attached card or returning them you your hand when the construct is destroyed
Brandon King
Or generate a new construct each upkeep of you don't have one.
Josiah Thomas
Normal 20 life
Jaxson Thomas
So basically Hearthstone?
Juan Lopez
I think not getting freebee constructs makes format more interesting. Makes totem armor, living weapon, lands that make dudes more important.
Ian Adams
There are auras and equipment that create tokens. I imagine these would be very important.
Elijah Evans
There's only 3 auras that destroy enchantments. That could be a problem.
Jackson Watson
Maby if instead of a construct it was any creature with total power and toughness of 2 in a situation like commander.
Logan Scott
>boggles mirror: the format
Adrian Ward
So i think the best solution is the three rules as stated, but 3 constructs instead of one. And sorceries are allowed that can't target creatures or players? There needs to be some more answers and interaction.
Camden Nelson
Lol turn one i attack with all three. Opponent "i block all" Well..now we race for manlands.
Alexander Anderson
Shatterstorm doesn't target any creature or player. Same with Wrath. And a bunch of mass removal.
Owen Foster
Thanks for your input, but I don't see the point?
Xavier Flores
Kinda yeah.
Blake Lewis
Right but it's even. It wipes the board. Now how are you going to win? Man lands probably. And your opponent should have something in the sideboard to answer control strategies. Like normal magic. Yeah?
Juan Hill
Why bother with the constructs at all at that point? It would seem the point is to be Voltron the Format, but allowing sorceries is just going to turn it into manlands and removal. And then it becomes manlands and Armageddon (with a manland in hand to play after geddon, naturally) Because the answer to sorcery-speed global removal in the outlined format...is more manlands.
Evan Carter
Ok i think your right. How about no sorceries that affect creatures? So shatterstorm. is still playable to allow for a control deck in the format.