1. Figure out where they will lay the track.
2. Buy some land there now while it's cheap.
3. Sell it when the value increases 10x because of the loop.
4. Profit?
I bet britfags working in Londonistan will buy property along the Hyperloop track to the city.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
>Figure out where they will lay the track.
Yeah, good luck.
>10x your money in a decade
Wow, you call that easy money?
>he is stupid enough to think the hyper loop meme can exist
>1. obtain private company data
>2. buy land that is most likely already purchased/owned by gov/corp/etc.
>3. ???
>4. Wake up from fantasy
I doubt there are many economically viable paths along Marmite land and EU.
Didn't say decade
Reading with understanding?
>t. thunderf00t
fuck off you neckbeard jew
It's 60s tech fgt, it's much more viable then Tesla.
I'm not talking about the land used for the track itself but around it. People will move to live there because of the track.
Hyperloop is a meme. Its too fucking expensive even compared to current highspeed trains and it wont be a big improvement
Just fly lol
>maglev trains are barely built anywhere due to costs
>but I swear a pressurized vacuum tube is more viable and will be actually be adopted
How people are this delusional and fall for Elon musks marketing are beyond me.
nice sources faggot
this isn't crypto shilling why is this on biz???
So you went from
>can't exist
to
>not economically feasible
Goes to show that you have no real arguments.
where can i buy this coin??
You dont have to be an engineer to understand how the proposed vacuum on top of a maglev wont make it more expensive
This board is not only crypto, (pajeet doesn't know.)
Bullshit, the loop is a closed system which will make it very durable and easy to maintain. It's a very viable, low-risk idea with huge potential returns. No air friction, no cows on the track and shit.
Say you buy some land in a shit hole that is planned to be along the track and then sell it once it's built and everyone can live there. Any business, even a hotel I think will see more business. Also any manufacturer of let's say crap like hats or any random shit might get much more business because they can sell their stuff to places along the tracks. (it's point to point)
>wont make it more expensive
Either you meant to write "will" or I don't understand why are you replying to me. It will make it more expensive, but not significantly as to make it infeasible, considering vacuum tubes are trivial. Not to mention that hyperloop travels 3 times faster than a maglev train and isn't any more expensive to maintain.
Plus maglev is not even necessary, I like the air bearings more.
In Europe you get peanuts if you get expropiated, mong. Either gov takes it for next to nothing or you go to jail if you refuse and they still get it.
>mong
I explained not the land used for the track but around it... Only brainlets here looking for another Confido...
Another way I guess to play this would be to figure out if there's some rare mineral or something they really need and buy some of it. They say that lithium used in electric cars only exists in like 2 places on earth and they can dictate the price. They will need to call their let's say copper supplier and negotiate a price.
from hyperloopforums:
"Heathrow is at its absolutely maximum flight capacity and needs new runways. This matters as it is the UK's Hub airport. No new runways can be built without massive protests and almost certainly failing EU pollution laws. Extra capacity built at other airports would be pointless as passengers need to connect to ongoing flights hence the hub status. In fact there is under capacity at three of the five London airports.
Heathrow's lack of capacity and its resulting reduction in hub status is mentioned as the number 1 issue for business growth in London currently. It is also a hugely hot political issue in the run up to the London Mayor elections.
Doing nothing will cost billions, whilst doing something will cost billions and be politically dangerous for the sponsoring politician.
A Hyperloop solution could join up Heathrow to London's other airports using their existing capacity to create the worlds largest aviation hub. "
It can't exist because Mohammed will blow it up.
Just build more runways
Where can I buy a porch of land 1000 km x 1 mm?
>why use a car, just buy more horses you fagit
There is no space for them, that's the point
>not economically feasible
If a single fault in the tube occurs, it would compress the entire track instantly. Destroying the entire line and killing anyone inside. Vacuum tubes are unstable.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
are you retarded? that's not how it works you brainlet
1 atmosphere pressure is literally NOTHING
>Vacuum tubes are unstable.
TOP KEK
we are building submarines that experience 30 bar you fucking moron
Would just gradually slow down the train.
Hyperloop is a meme. Go for HSR first
>1 atmosphere pressure is literally NOTHING
Now that's how I know that you're a brainlet.
>Submarines are not 100's-1000's of miles long
>Submarines can be built with supports inside where necessary
>There is atmosphere inside a submarine opposed to a void.
you realize every single engineer in existence would laugh at you? literally few mm thick steel is enough to handle 1 atmosphere
>hurr durr brainlet
prove me otherwise faggot, since you claim that 1 atmosphere is a huge deal
>mfw i actually own a shitton of frog land on the path of pic related
too bad hyperloop is a meme and will never happen
lol @ burgers thinking you can just lay tracks in a bunch of different european countries with their mishmash of regulations, many of them socialist
I doubt that.
youtube.com
...
thanks for proving my point lmao
literally had to drop a boulder on a fucking cistern that's not even designed to handle external pressure
I Initially said there needs to be a fault which will cause the track to fail.
>Boulder created a fault.
>'literally few mm thick steel' will do the same thing.
A submarine, even one like you described that is designed to handle 30 atmospheres of pressure, still has 1~ atmosphere inside. The hyperloop would have 0.
>1 against 30 is still much more counteractive force, than 0 against 1.
>submarine 29 atmosphere differential
>hyperloop 1 atmosphere differential
>submarine external pressure difference 30 times
>hyperloop external pressure difference infinite times.
>I bet britfags working in Londonistan will buy property along the Hyperloop
More like Jewish bankers living in London.
80% of people living in London probably won't be able to afford land or property there unless they buy some shitty studio flat.
The hyperloop can't work. Humans can't make it. It is just a novelty project by Elon.
>>hyperloop external pressure difference infinite times.
I can't help it if you've never completed Grade 2 math.
It's still 1 atmosphere math genius. And it's actually not complete vacuum even.
Troll or complete brainlet.
Dunning-Kruger if I've ever seen one kek. Literal brainlet.
It can and it has been done before. The idea isn't that novel. Out of all sillicon valley stuff this is the most feasible project. I wouldn't be surprised if Branson would build it in UK.
>but m-muh thunderf00t smartest man on earth
oh look its the transrapid scam but this time with a hyperloop
wow Elon must be really dumb, scamming himself out of his own money like that
you gotta think this through on a bigger scale
UMM??? this is a crypto only board GET OUT NORMIE REEEEEEEEEEE
what exactly is scam about hyperloop? are you saying Elon is a scammer? bring out your arguments and proofs
There's a working prototype and this is known stuff. I think after they build it in Dubai nobody will have questions about its legitimacy. And it's not like there's just one party working on it but multiple. Looks very legit and could disrupt shit like never before.
Like crypto it will make random ppl rich overnight.
>The hyperloop can't work. Humans can't make it.
Name one reason why.
everything Elon does is a scam until it isn't
yet the /pol/-tier rhetorics never change
makes you think
>sell shit to customers
>makes no money and isnt really profitable on a bigger scale
>Musk makes more money
>customer loses money
>hyperflop rusts away on a beach in dubai
>If a single fault in the plane* occurs, it would compress the entire plane* instantly. Destroying the entire plane* and killing anyone inside. planes* are unstable.
nice proof, splendid argument
>muh hyperflop turd
why wouldn't people just buy the Transrapid then?
why would people buy hyperflop which is more expensive to build/maintain etc. ?
>why wouldn't people just buy the Transrapid then?
your line of thinking doesn't make sense
>more expensive to build/maintain
>citation needed
>a huge tube at vaccum is cheaper to maintain than a monorail
lol okay
Apples and oranges. You don't get what the tube does.
a waste of money?
It's a closed system, yes it's cheaper.
>tiny hole
>whole closed system ded for days
nah its trash, monorail is superior
Boring Company is the hype machine and Elon Musk is fueling it. Aside from building a prototype, they will do absolutely nothing. Hyperloop will be licensed out around the world and flop spectacularly. Meanwhile, more Shekels flow into Elon Musk's pockets.
You have to realize that nothing truly hinges on Musk's dreams coming true or not. It's all set up to profit off hype alone.
nice fallacy you tempareture IQ faggot
this is a lie, good try though
except they already started digging with formal approval
you're a spectacular idiot if you think Musk cares about money
>will be licensed out around the world and flop spectacularly.
so exactly like the transrapid
Yeah, more 'quality' posts.
If you can't understand what a game changer removing air friction is go hang yourself off a monorail track.
Total trolls and brainlets.
Trains are cheaper and easier to maintain and they're already here having the infrastructure.
Nobody needs Hyperflop
>wow Elon must be really dumb, scamming himself out of his own money like that
>you're a spectacular idiot if you think Musk cares about money
What do you think his endgame is then? Proving to everybody once and for all that maglev really was a bad idea?
reducing congestion
horses are even cheaper
are you a retard?
>Trains are cheaper
>The True Cost Of High Speed Rail For The U.S. Is More Than $500 Billion
>www.businessinsider.com
how could I be so blind
his endgame is Mars
literally simple as that
He won't achieve that with a track that will forever remain a proof of concept and remain virtually unusable.
look in a mirror
The Plane dominates the US because at the size of their country it makes more sense to fly.
for Europe High Speed Trains like the TGV or ICE are the perfect solution.
>his endgame is Mars
there is nothing of value on Mars, besides cancer and dead rocks.
no pretty sure you're retarded if you think Horses are more efficient than High speed trains like the ICE or TGV.
Trains are also superior to retard shit like hyperflop or transrapist
>The Plane dominates the US because at the size of their country it makes more sense to fly.
Hyperloop is faster than plane.
>there is nothing of value on Mars, besides cancer and dead rocks.
You're a very simple-minded person.
Except oil.
>Hyperloop is faster than plane.
also more expensive at everything from maintaining to building it.
>You're a very simple-minded person.
there is no resources on Mars, also no way to get them from there to here.
it has no magnetic field which means cancer for everyone who lives there.
its a cold dead rock.
its cheaper to get oil from literally everywhere else on earth, no need to go to mars for it
no brainlet, your ICE and TGV are horses compared to a train running in vacuum.
>also more expensive at everything from maintaining to building it.
how much does maintaining and building hyperloop cost?
>there is no resources on Mars
scientific understanding
>no way to get them from there to here.
say hello to IT
>it has no magnetic field which means cancer for everyone who lives there
permanent shelters will be underground, not an issue
>I'm not talking about the land used for the track itself but around it. People will move to live there because of the track.
1) Only the value of the land around track-stations will increase.
2) Stations will only be built in populated areas, where land prices are already higher.
>IT
ITS*
this is unfortunately true, OP
on paper maybe, in the real world trains dominate the field already they will also in the future.
>how much does maintaining and building hyperloop cost?
more than keeping up regular trains
its not economic to use hyperflop
>scientific understanding
a robot can do that, no need for manned missions.
>say hello to IT
what?
>permanent shelters will be underground, not an issue
what a beautiful fullfilling life underground on mars in some aids infested bunker
get real kid that shit will never be reality
If it gets hit by a sledge hammer it undergoes a violent implosion. It's too fragile. You know some asshole will hit it just to do millions in damage or an accident or earthquake will take it out.
>more than keeping up regular trains
how much
>a robot can do that
it cannot
>what?
I corrected myself >what a beautiful fullfilling life underground on mars in some aids infested bunker
you're over exaggerating the surface radiation, I bet you think that moon landing is a hoax
it's easy to provide shielding with some dirt on top of the habitats
why do you even try brainlet? you're clearly an uninformed /pol/tier retard
go back to your containment board
>he unironically linked to thunderf00t
top kek
anyway, I have to attend to my shitcoins
have a good one, brainlets
>hyperloop is a very viable, low-risk idea
lmao delusional shill
If you make it out of soda cans...
>how much
a magnitude of fuckton too much
trains will hold their monopoly :)
>it cannot
yes a robot can, robots can simply transmit the data and be remote controlled. no need to leave earth.
>retard running away from the discussion
hyperflop confirmed kek
you know hyperloop is never happening, right?