GM/Players, do you ever describe/detail what a character looks like nude?
Buff check
That sounds wildly inappropriate to describe to people who are anything less than, like, lovers or something. Unless you're all open about doing this to turn eachother on or something. But that sounds really complicated when the internet has all you need there. Unless you mean just minor, non-pornographic details.
go away pedo
I can't recall ever doing so, but if it was somehow plot-relevant I wouldn't mind giving a short description.
I would definitely not give penis size or anal circumference.
Hasn't really mattered to the game, so we don't bother.
Do you describe your characters' dental care? Visits to the dentist? Brand of mouthwash? After all it is very important to digestive health, and peoples' teeth are visible basically all the time. It's not easy to fight evil when you can't even chew up your dinner.
Tatsumaki is an adult, she's just short and flat.
Those hips don't lie.
She looks like a highschool student
The original art is canon as far as I'm concerned.
Note how her dress covers her thighs, like something a real human might consider wearing. And how it wasn't cynically designed to sell loli pinups.
when it comes into play
Only, like, if there is something unusual going on there.
Like, if my character is covered in intricate arcane tattoos normally hidden by clothing? That probably bears a mention.
Or if they have a mysterious symbol branded into their back. Or, like, the stump of a tail that was cut off.
Unless there is something that was not otherwise known about the character's appearance thats worth mentioning, you can just say 'they be naked' and thats all anyone needs to know.
Otherwise you are being a creep.
>Not recording penis size and anal circumference on your character sheet.
Pleb.
I like to add a brief writeup of what my character looks like nude or close too in chase of shapechangers or if we go swimming. Everyone should put in at least this much effort
>Do you describe your characters' dental care?
No, but a discription of their teeth can add to the storytelling
>playing autistic artificer in college rooming with short illusionist gril
>he doesnt understand dressing in the morning because only child
>he takes his shirt of at the forge
you better believe i do
Only if they don't wear clothes, probably because they're some sort of nonhuman creature without care and/or need for them. Like, maybe, some sort of demon that's all leathery skin and bony plates and spends all its time either hanging out in hell with other demons or on the mortal plane ripping up people with its claws.
Thanks for the fap.
>her vulva is swollen and puffy hiding her fresh demure cunnae
>Like, maybe, some sort of demon that's all leathery skin and bony plates and spends all its time either hanging out in hell with other demons or on the mortal plane ripping up people with its claws.
You dont have to look like a dino to be able to do all that. Often the most dangerous devils look human.
"Well actually she just LOOKS like a child so I'm not really masturbating to or shitposting with drawings of children"
Yeah, but if they look human they usually wear clothes, so the character of their naked body is usually not relevant. If for some reason they don't wear clothes then the appearance of their body will get some description, though it might be somewhat circumspect in practice.
>Tatsumaki blushes shyly pulling her self inwards and crossing her legs as you inspect her opening.
>grown women can't be flat and short
user, get out of the house
Nope. It's only even SORT of come up even once, when my character got turned into a different race and had to have a new body made for him, with his wife assisting another PC's wife in sculpting the body out of void stuff. But we left it at that and didn't go into descriptions.
>if they look human they usually wear clothes
Key word being 'usually'
If it's relevant to the scene. Sure.
yes, actually.
One of my previous characters that was able to spit up acid regularly gargled with it to clean their jagged, meat eating teeth.
>Vomit mouthwash
Unless you had constant growing teeth like a rat or shark doing that would ruin them
They also had that, yes.
And it wasn't vomit, it was acid from an ENTIRELY different set of glands.
looks like a child, acts like a child. she's a child. Japan can fuck off with this 40 year old looking like she's 12 bullshit. Pedos the whole fucking lot of them.
>fuck laws or chronology, I am the sole arbiter of which ladies are of breeding age
I mean, I know full grown adult ladies less well endowed than the lady you're calling a child.
>not appreciating nude cultures
Get back heathen!
go away pedo
It raises a question tho,
what are pron details and what are not pornographic details on the nude description?
I think you're watching too much anime, friend.
Ladies in real life don't really match your standards.
One gives me a boner and one gives me an akward boner.
>hating on /young love/
old roastie detected
If it's a FATAL stat it's pornographic
Yeah but nobody plays FATAL
The point was substance that can dissolve things isnt good for teeth unless you got some kind of god mode on
I mean...not to other people, but I could tell you.
Well, except my Dragonball character, but that's because he's almost always naked, what with being a Frieza Clansman.
I'll give one when it comes up. Usually stopping at "heavily muscled" or "fat and flabby" or some similar description. If the character has some distinguishing Donut Steel marking on their body, I'll include that too.
Level of detail, mostly. If you say that the barmaid is a catgirl with tits twice the size of her own head, that's describing an NPC with a notable feature. If you feel prompted to give her exact measurements, shoe size and the vibrant color of her eyes and describe faint milk stains where her huge, meaty nipples are desperately straining against her shirt, that means you're choking the bishop under the table.
I like to describe that my fighter have a 10ft reach when naked.
I just want to say that choice of "notable features" looks a bit questionable even with just the first description.
>second time DMing
>ask group of people from discord my friend was a part of if any of them were interested in DnD
>get a sizeable group of 5-6 i dont remember
>2 of the players are into each other
>badly into each other
> about half way into the second session they disgust everyone by getting really sexual with talk about how their characters are doing it and how naked they are
>the rest of the party leaves the call after a couple of minutes of them doing this
>I leave the call after the 3 person
>about half a hour later they are still apperantly going at it
>join to see what they are up to
>"oh and what would you do next"
>"omg what are you 2 on about"
>"oh shit user we thought you left"
>really awkward session a week later
>party fell apart
i didnt know what to expect from strangers but i did not expect that
I want to summon that succubus
I would slather my balls in cheap rotgut and set it alight just to hear her piss through a broken walkman
Are you saying that HHH tits are not a notable feature?
...
>height and charisma are pornographic
>succubi got wise an started appearing as little girls in order to get wizards and paladins in trouble
I'm saying giving the catgirl HHH tits so you can describe them as a noticeable feature makes you look a little suspicious.
c-CUTHBERT, MY PATRON. WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN M-ME?
Saying the barmaid is a catgril that does not have HHH tits implies every other catgirl has HHH tits, which is not helping matters.
Pedo laws only apply to human children, begone Hanson!
>succubi got wise an started appearing as little girls in order to get wizards and paladins in trouble
Could work
>"Well, you already got run out of town by the Templars. There's nothing left for you there, so why not keep going down this path?"
Then why isnt it legal to import child sized dolls into some countries?
Yes, when they get nude where it can be seen
Sometimes minor details are important. Pic related - my character only has flesh tone on her hands and face and feet.
because is inexpensive.
just get some hand carved marble statues and you should be fine
I had a ghoul in a shadowrun game, I love going into the details on how people are disfigured. Being a ghoul that has claws, I added the detail of tons of accidental scars.
>because is inexpensive
wut?
>implying
so would a 10 year old who fell into a coma for 8 years be fine?
>A crevice runs through his face. One brow is buckled, leaving a hairless rent that goes up into his hairline. The eye is useless and blind, a dirty red white. The slash continues to his nose, a chunk of it missing, and down to carve a cleft in his lip. Several teeth are missing. The bones in his cheek and brow did not seem to set well and now curl down slightly. His face is constantly scrunched, eyes watery, and skin a pale clammy color. From what expression you can still see in his good eye it is a look of constant low intensity pain.
>Three holes decorate one shoulder, old arrow wounds since healed. The scars form three puckered marks.
>His left leg is misshapen, twisted at an odd angel where the bones did not heal correctly. The foot now pigeon toed sharply.
>His left hand is missing. A network of pasty scarred flesh goes from his stump of a forearm up to his elbow. Strapped over the stump is a crude wooden hand, bronze caps adorning his finger tips.
>A scar travels from the top of his right shoulder to his groin, pasty white, and shows a distinctly pale against red skin when he exerts himself
>On his neck two thin lines show attempts to slit his throat, both times too shallow to kill him
>The hand he still has is covered in small scars from training, the worst being one on his palm where a hunk of flesh was cut away
>His abdomen has a deep scar where he took a serrated knife to the belly and forced to pull it out himself
The guy has lived a hard life.
This is acceptable but ony when said parts are revealed
Actually, ONE is just a shitty low-effort artist, everyone looks like shit in the webcomic.
There's this thing called "petite", and Tatsumaki is damn near thirty.
I like the way it looks. It's really funny and it fits the tone of the comic really well
When my face character in Dark Heresy takes notable wounds, I add them to her description. She has a large puckered scar on the front of her left hip and waddles slightly when she walks after a sniper shot in the third session blew the iliac crest off of her pelvis and took an inch or so out of her ascending colon, the former of which had to be replaced by a grafted steel plate. She's intensely self-conscious about it.
Being a flat chick is like a dude having a small cock. They're worthless.
There's a difference between being petite and looking like a twelve year old
Depends on how the law of your land handles the mentally handicapped.
True. Twelve year olds don't have hips.
Tatsumaki does.
Long dicks put the semen closer to the eggs; while tits, one the other hand, are a useless secondary sexual characteristic that just get in the way
My fifteen year old sister has wider hips than that
Except it still makes you a pedophile to be attracted to either of those things.
It works really well though. I feel like it has more personality than the animated series.
You're a useless secondary sexual charcteristic that just gets in the way!
she’s older than me by a factor of then, man
>useless
Did your mom give you baby formula, or did she just let the babysitter feed you doritos?
Alright, I must be retarded. How does liking big dicks make you a pedophile?
nice
I'm talking about small dicks. Keep up with the conversation.
My girlfriend has a small dick, but she's taller than me and has big fat boobs. Is this what /a/ calls 'popeye loli'?
Big tits are a recent thing as far as humanity is concerned.
>eying up your 15 year old sister
Do you have a single fact to back that up?
Why would she fix/replace the top edge of her hip? It serves no purpose
That better be a tucked penis there.
I have a system for measurements, otherwise not in particular
1d4 x4
chest, waist, hip and butt size
1 being a cup, 4 being DD cup, everything else is just scale
Mind you I usually only tell people I have a rule for that if people ask as personally I think it's a bit childish, and immature, but there's always that one person in the group "measurements?" or "so what are my characters measurements now?" after a gender change curse
chestlets have problems with child rearing.
They should take a lamaze class then
Tits are fatty tissue, size does not directly correlate with milk production.
But isn't the production of milk and milkers regulated by the same hormones, why would it make sense to think they aren't correlated?
Is it one of those conveniently reassuring interpretations of screwed data like "there's no correlation between height and penis size"?
Not all fats are the same; fat boobs are not big boobs, they are manboobs.
If by 'conveniently reassuring interpretations of screwed data' you mean 'it's more complicated than I think it is' then yes.