Fear

>his "monster" girls aren't monsters
>just cosplaying sluts
Why is Veeky Forums afraid of actual female monsters?

Other urls found in this thread:

rule34.paheal.net/post/list/Thri-Kreen/1
e621.net/post/index/1/Thri-kreen
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

What monsters are you referring to, user? Because Kitsune, Huldra, Selkie, Wood Wives and good ole fashioned Nymphs, Dryads and Elves are meant to be cosplaying sluts.

i am afraid of women in general

Who would probably kill you first for the most part. Also, the monster in the OP pic isn't a kitsune, it's a kumiho.

Whether they're men or women, it's better for animal-people to look like normal people with extra ears and tails than to go full furry.

>he doesn't know about Veeky Forumss endless fetish for dragons and Thri-keen

>boarderline

I wish the internet had a minimum bar for entry.

I defy you to post a picture of a sexualized thri-kreen. Such a thing does not exist.

>I defy you to post a picture of a sexualized thri-kreen. Such a thing does not exist.
user if you want thri-kreen lewds you just have to ask.

I'll have to wait until later today to post the thri-kreen erotica I wrote for Veeky Forums.

Huh?
I think I'm missing what OP is trying to get at.

>Why is Veeky Forums afraid of actual female monsters?
Not really, many of us are even married.

Nice

I want them, but only because I can't picture a praying mantis person all sexed up.

I sure hope you dont do this

Please tell me she eats her mates' head at the end.

...

Because a true monsters gender is irrelevant. Does it actually matter if a 3 story tall fire breathing dragon is male or female?

What's the point in having them at all then, if their otherness is so superficial? Just use nothing but humans if humans are all you really want.

It did in Shrek.

at zoophilia, I suppose

*badumpsh*

>true though

Ten seconds on Google.
rule34.paheal.net/post/list/Thri-Kreen/1
>Im-fucking-plying

Can't you keep this shit in the containment thread, you giant tumor?

You are a fool sir.

>Why is Veeky Forums afraid of actual female monsters?
Divorce courts, mostly.

How is it speaking common?

And it just gets better! e621.net/post/index/1/Thri-kreen

Same way Sawyer speaks common.

/thread

>>he doesn't know about Veeky Forumss endless fetish for dragons and Thri-keen

Clearly you weren't here for the Sergal rage. Veeky Forums was yiffing for months over those things.

Rolled 4, 1 = 5 (2d6)

They raped dragons, user. We couldn't allow them to exist out of quarantine.

Attractive women are kinda cute when they do do dumb infantile shit like wearing cat ears.

>How is it speaking common?
Psionics.

Frederica a cute.

Psionics produce a speech bubble?

No but it does produce a mental illusion of a speech bubble.
Less intrusive than just screaming in their Minds Ear and more respective of headspace privacy.

They make you think they do.

What are you rolling f or?

This.
It's impressive because I legit don't take shit from any man. But women...? No, those are terrifying.

...

>implying I don't frequent the nightmare waifu thread on /aco/

what's the difference between neko and "boar"derline?

>Visiting /aco/ for any other reason than Korra

Fucking this they're the same how is one furry and the other isn't?

This. It's like when your a kid and you touch the stove. You do it once and you know it hurts. Twice you're just making sure. Three times and your parents start to wonder if the vaccines really do cause autism.

A few dozen times? You're the sort of person who eats scissors and runs with glue.

>when you realize most furries are not actually furry according to that chart

No fuck off, kitsune are shapeshifters and they could take any form they wanted even from the their opposite gender, they shapeshift to trick humans on any ways they see fit and elves were never supposed to be "cosplaying sluts" in any of their many interpretations in folklore and mythology. There were, however, versions that said they were rapists of human women

OR, you could learn the insanely simple ways they think and view the world and use that to keep the leash on them. It's about 95% effective and you wouldn't want the other 5% anyway.

The OP asked for actual female monsters, user listed monsters that actually have (or are most iconic in) female forms.

Nymphs are notorious for fucking humans in mythology. Huldra and selkies, too.

I'm not OP but this is not monster enough, it still has a human face and human tits on a 'monster' body.

The user said they were meant to be "cosplaying sluts" and while it might be true on his doujinshi it's not accurate on the original tales that created said creatures nor on any other form of higher literature featuring them

1. The iconic kitsune in mythology often takes a beautiful female form.

2. Elves have being beautiful humans with point ears in many, many, MANY interpretations. In fact, the original elves of Norse myth are literally just tall, beautiful, glowy people. You don't know shit.

The monster part is that that's a male.

>hear someone talking online about how Scylla makes them horny
>dang man, dude's pretty hardcore for waifuing a wild sea-hoboette with a pack of dogs for legs
>"lol wat? I'm talking about the MGE octopus girls"

inb4 incel virgin MTGOW reddit ect

incel virgin MTGOW reddit ect

Because the internet is for porn.

>he doesn't think there's porn of actually monstrous monsters

>somewhere on the darkweb SCP is funding itself selling porn of some of the less memetic SCP's
Makes sense.

...

1. On your eroge perhaps. They would take the form of a sweet little old lady or a full hearted young boy, beautiful maidens are fair game but they can do much better than just be "monsters that tricks men by seducing them with a beautiful human form #375"

2. And how does this clash with what I said? Are you such a neckbeard that beautiful = cosplaying sluts for you? Yeah, they were beautiful, that doesn't change the fact that in folklore they were mostly tiny people that would curse(A.K.A cause illness) someone unlucky enough to insult their ways, unintentionally most of the times. And in mythology they showed up almost always as male elf, one time even tasked to rape a princess

The most iconic story about Kitsune is about one who fell in love with a man, married him, then was forced to flee when he discovered her nature.
She still returned every night.

It's THE most well known story about Kitsune, and the one that first comes to mind, in Japan.

>liking Korra

Paws, user. Borderline has fucking paws.

Scylla is my daughterfu

What IS the line, precisely? At what point are you dealing with something you're likely to kill because you can't even talk to it?

Charybdis a shit

I think you seriously underestimate the kinds of things I'd be willing to stick my dick in user.

1. You know what the most famous kitsune story is, right? It's the one about a man marrying a beautiful woman then one day noticing her fox tail, forcing her to leave.

>Yeah, they were beautiful, that doesn't change the fact that in folklore they were mostly tiny people that would curse

This is straight up incorrect. The earliest recorded mention of elves casts them as tall, almost giant beautiful beings of light that serve one of the Norse gods. From then on, there have been an absolutely multitude of different elf interpretations, but not nearly all of them fit your definition. Elf (or, more often, alf) has been used to describe nymph stand-ins, it's been associated by the Irish with the Tuatha de Danaan, it's even been conflated with huldra at one point in Northern England. In fact, a great many of the interpretations you seem to think of as the original standard are derived post-Christian stories that try to fit elves into an Abrahamic view of the world - for example, we can safely assume that everything Snorri wrote about light/dark elves is his Christian fanfiction.

Frost giants are pretty low tier, there was even a quest about this back in the day.

fuck off grandpa no body gives a shit about you

>Implying frost giants are the worst of it user

My point still stands, Kitsune are not just temptress even if the most famous tale featuring one is about the marriage between a man and the kitsune, to have them as just that is a waste considering there are tons of other beings with the same idea but sadly it's all what they became in pop culture

>This is straight up incorrect...
It's not, it's correct for folkloric elves which are different than mythologic elves, and again, the point still stands: most notable elf tales feature male elves, therefore they were never meant to be cosplaying sluts as that user said and the reason behind this comment chain

Jokes on you
I make most, if not all my monsters female unless noted otherwise
Especially the ones big enough to eat a PC

Korra you lust after, but never like

Literally only good for the porn.

>selkies
The males but the females were forced to be wives of human men.

...

Based

>heh, you better watch out I'm pretty hardcore I'd stick my dick in anything! Even a FROST GIANT!
>wait isn't that just like a hot babe but you know..bigger?
>yeah but it's reaaaallllyyyy cooollllld and huge ooooOOOOooooo

I chuckled.

People just need to awaken to a lust slightly deeper in their souls. A definition of 'cute' that can include a half dozen gleaming red eyes cracking out of her face.

This thing is pretty sweet too.

Forgot pic. See? Adorable.

Is it really that bad?
I didn't like it much, but I can't say it was horrible.

If anything that makes it more monstrous. I'd be more scared of that thing in a dark forest than your regular old dragon or basilisk.

What really separates "borderline furry" from "full furry" is the mouth. Take a wolf girl for example. Wolf tail and ears is fine. Wolf hands, feet, and nose? Bordering on furry, but still fine. Having a wolf shaped mouth? Definitely furry. Obviously adding fur to the skin is also definitely furry.

So they're only furry if the mouth is this shape?

Why do you guys even care so much?

The issue people have with furries isn't the anthropomorphic animals, it's the people drawing and fapping to them

It actually really is not the actual artists and shit.
It's mostly the people who wear Fursuits and do all kinds of weird degenerate shit. you know the ones. the one's who keep their shit in the places where it lives are fine.

Some people can't make that distinction and immediately jump to assuming that anyone who shows any interest in beast races and anthropomorphic animals is actually the worst of the worst suit wearing furry jacking off under the table

Well, that or if they have fur covering their entire bodies (as opposed to just their hands and feet). The closest one can get to furry without actually being furry is:
>paws for hands and feet
>fur covering hands and feet (and shins and forearms)
>a dog/cat like nose (but a human mouth)
>animal ears and tail
>animal eyes

The question is, why do you care if it's "furry"? I mean are you afraid of what people on cambodian salad dissertation forums think? Do you think that liking something "too furry" will cause an AIDS laden fursuit to manifest in your home and or place of business? I've seen a lot of people trying to jump through semantic hoops for some shit that really doesn't matter

It's just useful for categorization user. Like how people try to figure out whether traps are gay or not.

Well that one's easy

Traps are cute

I don't think there's a clear line anywhere - it just either is furry or it isn't. It also matters how it's treated - most folks will treat a gnoll as a legitimate enemy no matter the gender, but it's furry if it's treated as something to sexualize.

Who else in this thread has played teraurge?

>try to figure out whether traps are gay or not.
>Try
They are, no amount of mental gymnastics will prove otherwise.

Wouldn’t be forced if they didn’t make it so easy to own one.

But i don't want humans.
I want humans with cat ears.