USA - abandons the world, becoming compeltely isolationist Russia - civil war 2.0, eventually won by muslims led by charismatic chechnyan warlord China - barely avoids civil war, reforms as federal republic, communist party loses power Australia - secedes from commonwealth, descends into Mad Max withing decade New Zealand - did not participate, swarmed by refugees form Australia UK - Scotland finally secedes. France - did not participate, was in deep shit already Argentina - wisely did not participate, is a stable and prosperous country Chile - same as Argentina Norway - government refused to participate, then a coup happened. Then Swedes, Danes, Finns and Poles marched in, defeated the junta and they occcupy the country to this day India - initially does not participate then sees an oportunity and takes over Antarctica, rises as the world’s sole superpower
Is this a realistic outcome of a war over Antartctica?
Blake Cox
No.
Jaxson Thompson
No.
Carter Martin
No, literally none of that would happen
Ayden Hall
It's not a realistic outcome of anything, period.
Cameron Walker
I doubt anybody considered communist Russia and dissolution of Austira-Hungary as a realistic outcome of WWI.
Cooper Allen
For reasons of boredom I was reading about the Chinese Civil War today. And it turns out that in the post-WW2 phase of the war, 1946-1949, both sides predicated their strategic planning on the assumption that WW3 would break out any day. The Battle of Shanghai happened despite the fact that the Nationalists knew they couldn't hold it permanently, because they literally expected a US-Soviet war within weeks and therefore anticipated US help against the Maoist commies. And the Maoists blitzkreiged it because, likewise, they worried that if they delated even slightly they'd be facing US reinforcements instead of just Chinese Nationalists.
Samuel Cox
>USA Libshits would never allow it to happen >Russia >allowing kebab to win >China They're due for a civil war, but I doubt it'll result in a republic >Australia Stop playing Overwatch, the Abos aren't that destructive. >New Zealand It's about time they officially became Australia's colony >UK HAH >France Okay >Argentina Isn't white >Chile Okay >Norway >any modern Scandis doing anything >Indian Will never be a super power, not even by 2020
Carter Russell
Curious: Are you American? Because I feel like the whole independent Scotland thing is weirdly adored over there, judging by what I saw on normie media at the time. Scotland, North. Ireland and Wales seem to get a lot of attention because of muh heritage fags.
Zachary Flores
Sounds pretty /pol/ to me.
Camden Campbell
>Libshits would never allow it to happen
/pol/ told me Texas alone could wipe out libshits in a civil war.
Ian Davis
I have a question. Why would anyone fight over a barren wasteland like Antarctica?
Brandon Bailey
Republicunts are too apathetic to ever engage in a civil war, so they'll never remove libshits.
Easton Nguyen
It's not muh heritage, it's because we did it first and are fascinated with it actually happening again in current year
Wyatt James
>India ever becoming a superpower lamo
The real question is, why fight over Antarctica in the first place? Ignoring the treaty, Antarctica is incredibly isolated, incredibly cold, one season of the year is always night, and the other season is perpetual day. In the event that the continent becomes de-glaciated, there would be next to no arable land and chances are that some kind of primordial superdisease could be let out of the Antarctic ice. Even if the place is rich in mineral deposits, I doubt the effort to mine them out would be worth it.
Asher Adams
NO.
Ethan Nguyen
>USA - abandons the world, becoming compeltely isolationist USA have periods of isolationism but after such war government would either collapse under its own weight or decentralise greatly to stay stable >Russia - civil war 2.0, eventually won by muslims led by charismatic chechnyan warlord Russia have potential for civil war, and for muslim uprising but you forget that even though army is in like 20% muslim, nuclear arsenal is in Russian hand. Balkanization may happen though. >China - barely avoids civil war, reforms as federal republic, communist party loses power Get the warlords ready, that shit ain't ending pretty >Australia - secedes from commonwealth, descends into Mad Max withing decade They have no potential for such shitshow. But they have for "White Australia" policies and being cheep looting ground for South-East asian and Chinese refugees. >New Zealand - did not participate, swarmed by refugees form Australia >UK - Scotland finally secedes. >France - did not participate, was in deep shit already k >Argentina - wisely did not participate, is a stable and prosperous country Only after Pinochet treatment. Also >Argentina >Not grabbing Falklands first chance they get lmao no >Chile - same as Argentina >Norway - government refused to participate, then a coup happened. Then Swedes, Danes, Finns and Poles marched in, defeated the junta and they occcupy the country to this day >Sweden >Not 3rd world falied state even before war >Finns and Danes >Doing shit Poles are like 2% of Norway population and Poland have enough powerprojection to do some shit to Norway but they are not going to - they have good deals with dictators when West ain't looking. But if it means that they get Norway's oil field then it's a possiblity >India - initially does not participate then sees an oportunity and takes over Antarctica, rises as the world’s sole superpower Balkanisation of India is needed for this scenario, together with dyingout of hinduism
5/10
Evan Powell
mal_reconsiders_making_a_rebutall.gif
Easton Moore
Pre-Brexit, I was pro-Scottish autonomy.
Post-Brexit, I really hope the Union holds. Assuming Brexit actually happens.
Michael Williams
Really? I'm the opposite. Pre-Brexit it was dumb because there's no way they'd be allowed back in the EU, so they'd be totally screwed economically. Post-Brexit I say they secede and let England and Wales live with their mistake. Again, assuming it actually happens
Grayson Turner
>Libshits would never allow it to happen Interventionist foreign policy is a bipartisan consensus. It's only the far left and the far right that advocate against it in any way. You're right that it wouldn't happen though.
Nathan Bailey
>the whole independent Scotland thing is weirdly adored over there We just generally like people seceding from English rule. Call it genetic memory.
Aaron Rivera
>Post-Brexit I say they secede and let England and Wales live with their mistake Strictly speaking Scotland has also invoked article whatever-it-was that means they're leaving as part of the UK. Idk if an independence vote would change that.
Adam Fisher
Why would anyone fight over Antarctica?
Lincoln Adams
You are exactly opposite on that. The far right is pseudo-non-interventionist and the far left is extremely non-interventionist. It's the mainstream parties and the "centrists" that advocate constant military intervention.
Ethan Walker
That's exactly what user said, user.
Wyatt Fisher
Known resource deposits, potentially even more resources. If we're going fictional, then Atlantean ruins/super science, Nazi secret research base, alien spaceship/base, Cthulhoids or other supernaturals/pan dimensional beings, etc. Or any combinations of the preceeding!
Jonathan Williams
But Antartica doesnt exist
David Sanchez
>Is this a realistic outcome of a war over Antartctica?
In Candy Land, maybe.
Parker Evans
>USA abandons the world and becomes isolationist Stop, my penis can only be so erect!
Josiah Collins
If they fought actual libshits then yea, but they'd fight the army and lose
