Fembots, gynoids, ladytrons, etc. go here

Can I get some pics of gynoids? New, used, broken, refurbished, whatever ya got.

Please not just fanart of that thicc realdoll with the hoodie thong

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolly_(sheep)
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

...

Just what we need, a robot powered by dead children

...

...

obligaotry

sperm isnt children user, it's more like the construction blueprint, or the manual, for making children.

They're more like a transport mechanism for one segment of an instruction set which may be used in the creation of children. Every one of which is completely replaceable.

It's like, if you're going to mourn sperm you might as well mourn your nail clippings, skin cells, and saliva.

Hahaha, no!

...

>Implying I don't consume all my spent nail clippings and skin scrapings to recycle what would otherwise be wasted material

fuck that's adorable and hilarious.

>sex doll
>doesn't even have a diesel engine
Fucking casual.

NO FREMEN ALLOWED ON Veeky Forums

...

...

...

Here's one more to your taste then.

...

>20 cents

So the real penitence here is having to find a bunch of dimes to use the machine.

...

you fucking wot

Semen isn't bad for consumption, either

Shaddup Chrischan
You cucked your own son

...

I find it misguided when men want to replace women with robots.
Namely since the Y chromosome is provided by the male, so if asexual reproduction were a thing, males would be the redundant sex.

You should just ignore incels. You're never going to convince them that the problem isn't everybody else.

user, you mistunderstand. I want to replace all humans with robots.

>implying you as a person aren't already completely replaceable

Not an incel, but I don't think it's that big of a deal. I dunno about you guys, but I'm just having sex for fun; reproducing is not a desirable outcome right now.

If there's one thing I want to see on the internet it's a costume swap between this endowed lass and The Plain Doll

>Sam & Max: The Anime

I don't think it's about reproduction.

People are miserable currently and they want something without working for it since they feel overworked everywhere else.

Correct. But you are misunderstanding: these ultra-beta males want to use technology to 'replace' women specifically because they know that they are not useful or required. The fantasy is to cover up that shameful defect by taking their ball and going home.

Never mind that if you have the ability to do artificial wombs, you have almost certainly had artificial sperm for much, much longer. So such a fantasy logically requires women to have already had the opportunity to cut men out of the picture and chosen not to.

Which makes the fantasy not just pathetic, but cowardly and dishonorable. Like the guy who gets his life spared by an honorable opponent but then backstabs him at the first available opportunity.

look user, robot is the only flavor of monstergirl I'm going to be getting ANY time soon. Unless you have some fucking chimera tech in your back pocket you're not telling anybody about.

Studies show it actually fucks with male gut flora pretty badly. for women their gut flora benefits and there's mounting evidence it can help regulate hormones during periods to ease things like cramps. Women ingesting semen or having it come into contact with a mucous membrane somehow(penetrative sex to completion being the easiest method) also has been shown to severely reduce or eliminate headaches regardless of their current stage in their cycle.

>someone did something bad to me so let's genocide that person's entire race and/or sex
/r9pol/ in a nutshell.

...

We should keep both genders for the sake of redundancy due to massive system crash, and similarly allow some natural breeding for the same reasons. What if the genetic system crashes?
But otherwise, MOST kids should be perfect tailor babies out of a robo-womb, male or female.

This guy has it right.

Different user but china is making headway in genetics faster than the rest of the world is making headway with humanoid robots. So we'll probably get monster girls before we get robot girls and they won't have the red tape surrounding them that the robot girls would as they would fall within the burgeoning laws on sex robots.

>user, you mistunderstand. I want to replace all humans with robots.
They wouldn't replace us, would they?
>Unless you have some fucking chimera tech in your back pocket you're not telling anybody about.
Where is Mad/Drunk Geneticist when you need him?

In that case, china has my dollar.

Brook no insult otherwise you're a soyboy.

Political correctness hinders progress! More news at 11.

>be me
>be kept on a fuck reserve with other low-tech humans
>learn how to fuck at age 5 like everyone else
>professional fucker by age 15
>no one outside the reserve fucks anymore
>they just watch virtual reality feeds of us fucking while machines make more of them
>they all look amazing but nobody fucks because VR is easier than fucking
>one day the porn producers come to the fuck reserve like normal
>they take all us away and tell us we have to fuck as many outsiders as we can because their baby machines stopped working

life is good for grug.

...

>tfw real life monstergirls would also mean real life furries
ultimate monkey paw, I hope it never happens

Reminds me of the Transformers character I made with herolab

Headlights

I'm ok with it.
Swat katz was all right.

More than likely that would be how it starts out and what the most common shit would be. Animal ears, various nose jobs, possible paw pads, eye changes, fur.
Making us grow mammalian attributes or bits we already have the hardpoints and software for would be easiest and least risky but doing shit like extra arms or tentacles or lizard features like scales would have to come later and be harder to produce.

>various nose jobs
But that is furry

>Namely since the Y chromosome is provided by the male, so if asexual reproduction were a thing, males would be the redundant sex.

Can you explain to someone who doesn't know anything about biology why that is the case?
If the Y chromosome is provided by the male, why is it redundant?

I know. I was listing things that would:
A. Be easiest to gene mod like nose tip changes like color or texture or moist nose tips etc.
And
B. Shit that coincides with A that happens to also be where various levels of furry start.

...

For the people developing this stuff, I'm sure they'll just see "profitable customer demographic."

Basically, it would be human version of cloning process
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolly_(sheep)
which doesn't require male donor, unless you want the offspring to be male.
You'd probably want to keep couple men around as a fall-back mechanism though.

>"profitable customer demographic."
especially when you think beyond the nosejobs - feet with paws? fur grafts? literal horsecock?

It's more that computers are near the top of the S-curve while biotech is still near the bottom. The exponential growth phase has yet to occur.

>which doesn't require male donor, unless you want the offspring to be male.

And why wouldn't the person trying to remove women want the offspring to be male? The statement is sorta incorrect. If asexual reproduction was a thing, either and neither gender would be redundant, because whichever remains would continue to propagate.

With the present day technology, you do need female donor to provide egg (ovum), so you can't take women from the process.

If we're talking science fiction tech then sure, you might as well fabricate babies in replicator.

I've always wondered how much shit like this becoming easier to do/being able to do more would effect the amount of people who have such procedures. Like obviously yeah, it becoming more realistically obtainable will definitely lead to an uptick in people getting such procedures, but I wonder if it would ever be enough to not be considered a niche thing (In the cosmetic sense, at least. Obviously getting augments that provide tangible benefits would be more mainstream than getting a weird nosejob.)

It gets a little more complicated when you remember that the engineers are still 90% male.

>With the present day technology, you do need female donor to provide egg (ovum), so you can't take women from the process.

Yeah but the statement wasn't about the eggs and sperm, but about chromosomes. I just didn't see how having a Y chromosome would be a disadvantage in any shape or form. If anything, having XY should be less redundant than XX I was thinking, since XX can't produce a Y.

Isn't it more soy to be that insecure? Because we call people like that pussies where I'm from.

Different user. I recall there being some talk on the matter that you can make a biological male out of an XX under certain conditions in the womb or make an X chromosome into a Y with gene editing but not vice versa for a Y to X.
There's also a lot of genetic conditions that can arise when you're working with an XY compared to an XX like color blindness.
The tl;dr on it all is currently you can clone using only female stock and the end result has a better chance of not being genetically faulty and you can still produce males from it if you desired whereas cloning using only males requires female ovum and the end result is iffy.

Where I come from someone that sits there and takes insults are the betas that get bullied for their weakness.

...

...

Of course, some gynoids are pretty damn realistic too

That's just what they tell children to make them shut up.

>Never mind that if you have the ability to do artificial wombs, you have almost certainly had artificial sperm for much, much longer.
You know, it’s funny— I was astonished at how it easy it was to get induced pluripotent stem (IPS) cells. We all know that, as development proceeds, gene expression in somatic cell lines gets locked down and you lose pluripotency; that was established long ago in amphibian studies. And it doesn’t naturally run in reverse, ever (or so I thought). Knowing what genetic regulatory networks look like, I assumed that going backwards to pluripotentcy would probably involve undoing a lot epigenetic modification and such: a stepwise process that would take a long time to figure out. But no! You just upregulate some ridiculously small number of genes (four, IIRC) and you get an IPS cell. You can go a long way with just Oct-3/4.

So why is that? Evolution has no problem making signaling pointlessly complex. Why is it that easy to get to pluripotency? What’s going on? The more I thought about it, the more it seemed like Oct-3/4 and co. had to be involved in maintaining pluripotency in egg cells. Early development runs on maternal genes, so it makes sense for eggs to be “spring-loaded”: without something holding them back, they’d start dividing and differentiating. (They wouldn’t get very far, of course.) So you express Oct-3/4 and co. up until you’re fertilized, and then you downregulate those genes and start developing.

The logical implication was that it’d be really easy to go from IPS cell to egg cell. I’m in evolutionary biology, not molecular anything, so I didn’t know whether this was the case until I chanced in a chart showing the steps necessary to get from IPS cell to a particular somatic cell— and it looks like it’s pretty easy to get to something egg-ish.

To make a long story short, I think “somatic cell —> egg cell” is easier than “somatic cell —> sperm.” Dunno about wombs, though.

...

...

...

...

>make an X chromosome into a Y with gene editing but not vice versa for a Y to X.
Yeah but the point was that with XY you didn't even need to do that to begin with. It's only for XX that it's necessary to actually alter the chromosome into a different one. If you have XY however, making XX would involve taking the X and duplicating it or taking X from one pair of XY, and another X from a different pair.

>There's also a lot of genetic conditions that can arise when you're working with an XY compared to an XX like color blindness.
The issues are that it's the X chromosome which carries genetic information related to color perception, so if one X is faulty, the other one can cover up for it. Thus XY pairs have less fallbacks against color blindness. It's not really related to " working with XY" or cloning.

It's all irrelevant anyway since the future consists of everyone being a hermaphrodite/futa. It's pretty much peak performance and efficiency as far as reproduction is involved.

at least that one has a manual... so, one step forward...

...

...

Blue triangle isn’t working, and I never thought I’d need this manga in my life....

What is the fucking source?!?

>I just didn't see how having a Y chromosome would be a disadvantage in any shape or form
Well, if it comes in addition to XX ...

...

Well if we look at male earrings or tattoos in general you can likely get an idea for what's the time and affordability requirements for such things to go mainstream

[Sayman] Ikimono Goroshi

>Different user but china is making headway in genetics faster than the rest of the world is making headway with humanoid robots.
Eh. The stuff China does always sounds more like nationalistic stunts than ground-breaking science. Yeah, the Beijing Genomics Institute has a ton of sequencing capability, but are they making genomics breakthroughs with it? (For that matter, where is Illumina headquartered? Right.) What they’re doing is a lot like buying a bunch of Cray
supercomputers in 1987 and announcing that you’re going to create a general AI. It frightens and impresses people who don’t understand the field.

I don’t expect this situation to persist. Nobody has a monopoly on smarts, the Chinese government has been aggressive in its efforts to get Western-educated people to resettle in China, and things will get interesting in the USA once conservatives begin hacking away at academia in earnest. But it’s not particularly worrying right now.

Just search for Douman sayman and go from there. You should've just recognized it from the art itself

Why would someone recognize something they aren't familiar with from the art?

You don't have to make an X into a Y though. I also pointed out you can just make a biological male who runs with an XX chromosome. X into a Y is just one of the options.
It's related to XY because there's no fallback on the other X assuming only one has the defect. It's therefore an issue endemic to XY chromosome pairs.
You could clone XY's all day but they'll suffer that issue inherently.

No but they have a monopoly on lack of ethics and the compunction to capitalize on this, which they are.
America has a lot of laws and regs surrounding this and other GMO research while china does not.

Wait till the modding community gets their hands on this baby...

Oh boy

Because it's distinct and often posted enough everywhere that you would just know by association hanging around.

I don't play or know anything about Touhou but even I would recognize characters from it because I've been here too long.

>It's related to XY because there's no fallback on the other X assuming only one has the defect. It's therefore an issue endemic to XY chromosome pairs.
>You could clone XY's all day but they'll suffer that issue inherently.

The fallback is using a XY pair with a healthy X to provide the X, and only use the Y from the unhealthy pairs. Unless coincidentally it just so happens that every male with a healthy X is killed, but at that point everyone else would be color blind, so naturally their clones would also be color blind.

Forgive me, I have a lot to learn anyway...

>Why would someone recognize something they aren't familiar with from the art?
Pattern recognition is one of the key features of human intelligence.

Do she got that booty? SHE DOOO!

I used to wonder how the people of the past developed so many bizarre myths about human biology. Now that I’ve spent a lot of time browsing Veeky Forums, I no longer wonder.

...

Whoo boy...

When I said I had much to learn...

My thoughts exactly, but now it’s pointless

...