Why don’t gunfags just play a setting with guns and let us enjoy not having guns?

Why don’t gunfags just play a setting with guns and let us enjoy not having guns?

Because they want to have revolvers or better in a setting that would at least have matchlocks, while the GM and other players are trying to recapture the feelings of LOTR's pseudo-medieval recreation of Anglo-Saxon and Scandanavian mythos where the world is big and scary, not realizing that he was jerking off to his own language creations instead of trying to write books. Also they want plate and zweihanders, not realizing that matchlocks coexisted with those.

I do all of these things, but at least I realize that.

>positive forums and chans

I do not believe those things exist on the internet.

This.

you're implying anyone on this board plays games in the first place

Play in setting clearly set in the early/high medieval instead of late.

are guns really that big of an issue, in some medieval fantasy settings were there are wizards that shots fire of their fingertips or whatever is really a guy with a revolver so terrible overpowerfull?especially if it just have the same stats as a heavy crosbow or even less

>implying anyone on Veeky Forums actually plays anything

These gun threads have nothing to do with people actually playing games and everything to do with shitposting.

You really think someone would do that? Just go on the internet and post things to get a reaction?