It's not furry if it's Veeky Forums related user

archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53181753/#53251446
>It's not furry if it's Veeky Forums related user
>Things like beastmen, gnolls, kobolds, werewolves, ect are a thing with a long history of being Veeky Forums related, why are you bitching about them now?
Why did you lie?

Attached: lie.png (871x114, 6K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53181753/#53181753
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53294527/#53294527
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53493683/#53493683
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/54774630/#54774630
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/55335138/#55335138
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/56162532/#56162532
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/57431234/#57431234
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/58126770/#58126770
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53257835/#53257835
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53331316/#53331316
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

What does this have to do with _____ threads?

I don't follow.

>Why did you lie?
why don't you allow firearms in fantasy settings?

I do allow them. Now answer my question.
The statement "It's not furry if it's Veeky Forums related" has been proven false. Why did that user make such an obviously false claim?

Because Bajoran helmets

then I din't lied

>proven false
Send me that peer-reviewed study on furriness levels.

Discussing werewolves and gnolls, what society might be formed in and around them and how do they act is Veeky Forums related.

Talking about how much you'd like a big titty werewolf gf with a giant footlong dong to breed with is degenerate furryshit.

Were you the one who said "It's not furry if it's Veeky Forums related"?

Attached: 1495322381005.png (1340x360, 65K)

nope

>Talking about how much you'd like a big titty werewolf gf with a giant footlong dong to breed with is degenerate furryshit.
I fully agree, but then again I’ve never seen such a thing posted on Veeky Forums unless it was meant to be a falseflag intended to derail a beastfolk thread because some weeb got mad someone said monstergirls are shit.

I'm willingly exaggerating, yeah, but a lot of beastfolk threads do degenerate into furryshit/waifufagging. Kind of seen it happen repeatedly, and while I agree that some of these posts might have indeed been some form of falseflagging, I don't think all of them are. The "CYOA" threads (Which are ridiculous) and former quests kind of prove that Veeky Forums has a lot of very sad an dlonely individuals.

This thread was allowed:
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53181753/#53181753

These threads were not allowed:
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53294527/#53294527
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53493683/#53493683
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/54774630/#54774630
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/55335138/#55335138
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/56162532/#56162532
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/57431234/#57431234
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/58126770/#58126770

These threads, with a different image and different text, so you can't say they were "exactly the same thread", were not allowed:
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53257835/#53257835
archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53331316/#53331316

In what way was the first thread OP "Discussing werewolves and gnolls, what society might be formed in and around them and how do they act" that all the other thread OPs were not?

you do know that crying about other threads that were allowed and threads that weren't won't solve a thing?
Also spamming threads will just make the mods more trigger happy

>archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/53257835/#53257835

Are you autistic, or just fucking retarded? It's pretty clear to me that the first was a slip-up on the part of the mods which either forgot to delete it, or did not notice it, while the other ones were removed as they should.

Why did that user say "It's not furry if it's Veeky Forums related" when in fact mods do not make an exception for Veeky Forums related furry images?

...Wait a minute.

You're just a furfag that's mad you don't get to post furshit pictures at will hre, aren't you?

Holy shit, you people are such cancer. I know this is probably bait but

God fucking damn.

>did not notice it
>Opening post: thursday 11 may 2017
>last reply: monday 15 may 2017
>offsite archives prove there were mods watching the board in that time

>You're just a furfag that's mad you don't get to post furshit pictures at will hre, aren't you?
No, I'm mad that some anons DO get to post fetish bait images all the time.

FUCK OFF MAGNUS YOU ARE NOT WANTED HERE

What's the point of this thread?

Attached: 1494279168266.jpg (1768x2292, 183K)